Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(168,202 posts)
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 05:49 PM 7 hrs ago

US troops in Iran racing against the clock before running out of ammo: report

Source: Raw Story

March 1, 2026 3:31PM ET


U.S. troops in Iran are staring down a difficult situation in the wake of strikes that killed Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to a new report.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday that U.S. troops are racing to destroy Iran's ballistic and nuclear missile facilities before they run out of interceptors to defend from Iranian retaliatory strikes. The exact size of the military's ammunition base is classified, but analysts and former officials who spoke to The Journal said the stockpile has been diminished after repeated conflicts in the region.

At the same time, military troops are working to fend off a series of retaliatory strikes from the Iranians. U.S. Central Command said on Saturday that they mounted a "largely successful defense against hundreds of Iranian missile and drone attacks," according to the report.

“One of the challenges is you can deplete these really quickly,” Kelly Grieco, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center, told The Journal. “We’re using them faster than we can replace them.”

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-iran-2675514870/?utm_source=superhead



49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US troops in Iran racing against the clock before running out of ammo: report (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 7 hrs ago OP
The planning phase was skipped UpInArms 7 hrs ago #1
Planning? WHat's that? Amaryllis 6 hrs ago #21
Do you expect me to believe Retrograde 3 hrs ago #44
"Hic!Seth" Skittles 2 hrs ago #45
Gee Donald, maybe you should have thought of that C_U_L8R 7 hrs ago #2
And it never occurred to Kegsbreath... GiqueCee 7 hrs ago #3
Runs out of ammo but never runs out of beer. dem4decades 6 hrs ago #18
When he was confirmed he swore that he wouldn't drink while was Secretary of Defense... SeattleVet 6 hrs ago #24
Let ICE send some. Traildogbob 7 hrs ago #4
Bibi doesn't care how many American GIs get snuffed. Klarkashton 7 hrs ago #5
Trump doesn't either. ananda 7 hrs ago #6
Bibi, like Donald, doesn't care how many lives, johnnyfins 7 hrs ago #7
Fact... sheshe2 7 hrs ago #9
Bibi is ready fight Iran right down to the last American. calguy 5 hrs ago #35
*facepalm* sakabatou 7 hrs ago #8
Sounds like they've adopted Russia's 'No Supply Lines' strategy NeoTrajan 7 hrs ago #10
Terrible lede...U.S. troops are not 'in Iran'. They are shooting at Iran from the Gulf States. pecosbob 7 hrs ago #11
I don't have a sub to the WSJ (for obvious reasons) BumRushDaShow 7 hrs ago #12
I saw this and wasted about ten minutes markodochartaigh 6 hrs ago #19
This debsy 6 hrs ago #20
"US troops in Iran"? DavidDvorkin 6 hrs ago #13
Very sloppy writing from them. They apparently mean our bases in the region. highplainsdem 6 hrs ago #14
That makes much more sense. DavidDvorkin 6 hrs ago #15
They have a link at the bottom of the story for reporting corrections and typos. highplainsdem 6 hrs ago #16
Sloppy, or deliberately misleading? Martin Eden 6 hrs ago #23
Probably not, but it might've been a less experienced journalist using Ai, though there's no note highplainsdem 5 hrs ago #34
Just did some checking, and they do use some AI: highplainsdem 5 hrs ago #37
RawStory tends to like their click baity headlines. progressoid 5 hrs ago #30
They also use AI, as I just discovered. See reply 37. highplainsdem 5 hrs ago #38
WSJ Headline is: "U.S. Races to Accomplish Iran Mission Before Munitions Run Out" IronLionZion 6 hrs ago #17
Nice to let eveyone know.....Donald said this would be a 4-5 day operation Historic NY 2 hrs ago #47
'You go into an illegal war with the ammo you have, not the amount of ammo you actually need'. - Rummy nt Exp 6 hrs ago #22
This whole thing is giving me a fright hibbing 5 hrs ago #39
I second that facepalm. Dave Bowman 6 hrs ago #25
what does "IN IRAN" mean? We have boots on the ground there??? LymphocyteLover 5 hrs ago #26
Was someone using the ammo jet to go to a hockey game? Just checking. twodogsbarking 5 hrs ago #27
Wish it was that simple. paleotn 5 hrs ago #29
Well, that answers my question from yesterday morning... paleotn 5 hrs ago #28
Fucking unacceptable that we are THAT short on important weapons this quickly. Callie1979 5 hrs ago #31
Issue on ships is that SM2 anti air missile system can not be reloaded at sea. Not a total inventory issue.... dutch777 5 hrs ago #32
MAGA make america grenades again !! CountAllVotes 5 hrs ago #33
As an old veteran, I will never let anyone talk about slightlv 5 hrs ago #36
In his first term, Trump loudly claimed that the military was low on ammunition. Norrrm 5 hrs ago #40
i can donate a shovel or a bucket with a hole Tetrachloride 5 hrs ago #41
Never mind Sun Tzu, BidenRocks 4 hrs ago #42
As an ex military NCO MaineNative 4 hrs ago #43
WTF planned this Epic Fuckup Historic NY 2 hrs ago #46
So now we are going down the same path Figarosmom 1 hr ago #48
I used to go back and forth - BlueSpot 1 hr ago #49

UpInArms

(54,655 posts)
1. The planning phase was skipped
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 05:53 PM
7 hrs ago

The afterplan was never made and …

The boys will be schoolbombing boys until they run out of bombs and bullets

Retrograde

(11,406 posts)
44. Do you expect me to believe
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 10:09 PM
3 hrs ago

that our stellar Secretary of "War" forgot about a little thing called logistics planning? That thing that successful generals such as Eisenhower have historically spent most of their time and energies worrying about? That thing that seems boring and detail-oriented that can make or break a military operation? Yea, I'll buy that: Hic!Seth has spent the past year firing everyone with experience or common sense, abolishing attempts to keep the military diverse and inclusive, cutting ties with major universities, and spending more time on photo ops than on doing his job. Everything's just a game or a photo-op with this cabinet.

C_U_L8R

(49,233 posts)
2. Gee Donald, maybe you should have thought of that
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 05:54 PM
7 hrs ago

before you went and made a mess of things.

GiqueCee

(3,823 posts)
3. And it never occurred to Kegsbreath...
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 05:55 PM
7 hrs ago

... to replenish the ammo supply before commencing this fiasco in the making? As that wise old philosopher, Ron White, so sagely observed, "Ya can't fix stupid."

SeattleVet

(5,872 posts)
24. When he was confirmed he swore that he wouldn't drink while was Secretary of Defense...
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 07:32 PM
6 hrs ago

is that maybe one of the reasons why they changed his title to Secretary of War? Did that change of office title release him from his pledge?

Traildogbob

(12,890 posts)
4. Let ICE send some.
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 06:02 PM
7 hrs ago

They have an unlimited budget.
Remember Iraq, Rumsfeld would not send ammo of body armor and vehicle armor plates. And he said ya go to war with what you have. Families of soldiers were shipping gear.
This is the fucking republicans. Fuck all you anti war Trump voters. Boot up assholes. Take Barron with you. Booberts son has lots of time on his hands.

johnnyfins

(3,685 posts)
7. Bibi, like Donald, doesn't care how many lives,
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 06:08 PM
7 hrs ago

ON EITHER SIDE, are lost. Both of these guys are in it for themselves and that is IT. Period, FULL STOP.

NeoTrajan

(60 posts)
10. Sounds like they've adopted Russia's 'No Supply Lines' strategy
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 06:24 PM
7 hrs ago

Hegseth isn't worthy of trust with a national military

A drunken, Fox News flunky who is compensating for his tiny soul with adolescent bravado

pecosbob

(8,363 posts)
11. Terrible lede...U.S. troops are not 'in Iran'. They are shooting at Iran from the Gulf States.
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 06:26 PM
7 hrs ago

Not aimed at the OP...just sayin'.

BumRushDaShow

(168,202 posts)
12. I don't have a sub to the WSJ (for obvious reasons)
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 06:32 PM
7 hrs ago

so if anything, Raw Story at least summarizes articles from many of the news sites that require subs (I sub to quite a few myself including Barron's & MarketWatch, but not the WSJ add-on).

markodochartaigh

(5,353 posts)
19. I saw this and wasted about ten minutes
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 07:02 PM
6 hrs ago

trying to find out if I had missed something and US troops were on the ground in Iran.
I'm canceling my Raw Story daily email. This is more than carelessness, this is incompetence.

Martin Eden

(15,519 posts)
23. Sloppy, or deliberately misleading?
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 07:27 PM
6 hrs ago

No responsible journalist would be that sloppy, or that mileading.

highplainsdem

(61,335 posts)
34. Probably not, but it might've been a less experienced journalist using Ai, though there's no note
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 08:08 PM
5 hrs ago

about AI use.

progressoid

(53,000 posts)
30. RawStory tends to like their click baity headlines.
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 07:46 PM
5 hrs ago

They basically "borrow" from other news sites and juice it up a little to get more traffic.

IronLionZion

(51,088 posts)
17. WSJ Headline is: "U.S. Races to Accomplish Iran Mission Before Munitions Run Out"
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 06:53 PM
6 hrs ago

under their headline: "Trump says the Iran campaign might last a week or longer, but dwindling stockpiles could limit his options"

Raw Story bungled their headline

Archive link to WSJ article: https://archive.ph/t4DK4

Exp

(878 posts)
22. 'You go into an illegal war with the ammo you have, not the amount of ammo you actually need'. - Rummy nt
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 07:23 PM
6 hrs ago

hibbing

(10,566 posts)
39. This whole thing is giving me a fright
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 08:19 PM
5 hrs ago

That whole Bush cabal is what drew me to find DU. Another war of choice, based on a lie. I was a much younger man then, it hits a lot harder now.

Peace

paleotn

(22,003 posts)
29. Wish it was that simple.
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 07:44 PM
5 hrs ago

We're running into the same problem we had supplying Ukraine. Interceptor missiles are complex, expensive and time consuming to produce. We don't have the industrial infrastructure to support this. When they're gone, it's going to be a while getting new ones. That's been a bugaboo with DoD for some time. If we get into a protracted war, we ain't got the stockpiles.

paleotn

(22,003 posts)
28. Well, that answers my question from yesterday morning...
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 07:42 PM
5 hrs ago

Do we and Israel have more interceptor missiles than Iran has ballistic missiles and drones? Perhaps not. THAT is a huge problem. Drones can be downed by aircraft, but that's difficult operationally. Against ballistic missiles, there's no other defense.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=21055185

Callie1979

(1,262 posts)
31. Fucking unacceptable that we are THAT short on important weapons this quickly.
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 07:52 PM
5 hrs ago

And I dont care Who or HOW MANY people dropped the ball on this; it MUST be fixed.
We need to have multiple suppliers again like we USED to have.

dutch777

(5,019 posts)
32. Issue on ships is that SM2 anti air missile system can not be reloaded at sea. Not a total inventory issue....
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 07:56 PM
5 hrs ago

...immediately, rather they need heavy lift support at a port to restock the launch tubes. I think both we and Israel have been lucky that, while the Iranians, Hezbollah and maybe others have/had thousands and thousands of missiles, their ability to get a critical number at a coordinated time on target to overwhelm the radar and missile systems like the SM2 and Iron Dome has been lacking. My theory is that they have/had plenty of missiles but not enough launchers, trained crews and coordinated command and control to take strategic advantage of their stock. If we go against the 600 ship Chinese navy, we may see what the down side of this reality looks like when against a near peer adversary not the rag tag wannabes.

slightlv

(7,688 posts)
36. As an old veteran, I will never let anyone talk about
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 08:12 PM
5 hrs ago

republicans supporting the military any more, no matter where I see or hear it. They will get an earful from me (tho I doubt it'd make much difference to that level of denialism). Rumsfeld, Bush, and Cheney were among the first to short our troops on what they need to fight a war they wouldn't fight, but demanded be fought by the youth of our country. trump and miller and kegsbreath have taken it to a whole new level.

What if Russians and Americans walked off the battlefield and refused to fight someone else's money wars? I'm reminded of that old saying "What if they gave a war and nobody came?"...

Norrrm

(4,668 posts)
40. In his first term, Trump loudly claimed that the military was low on ammunition.
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 08:26 PM
5 hrs ago

In his first term, Trump loudly claimed that the military was low on ammunition.
Told by top generals (who didn't have names).
Has he been wasting this first year ignoring the need for ammo and supplies?

After all, Donald 'knows more than the generals.'

BidenRocks

(3,088 posts)
42. Never mind Sun Tzu,
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 08:45 PM
4 hrs ago

these geniuses haven't studied Ukraine and Russia's use of IRANIAN drones!

Production was already ramped up!

MaineNative

(89 posts)
43. As an ex military NCO
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 09:29 PM
4 hrs ago

this is just mind numbing. I expect the Ds to take action asap, but it seems like Schumer and Jeffries might run interference. I never thought we would be here. The Ds should have called an emergency meeting.

Figarosmom

(11,268 posts)
48. So now we are going down the same path
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 12:13 AM
1 hr ago

That Russia did in Ukraine. Running out of ammo and bad planning.

It's all about who's at tbe top.

BlueSpot

(1,288 posts)
49. I used to go back and forth -
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 12:31 AM
1 hr ago

Is the administration as stupid as it looks or are they really crazy like a fox? I had my bias but never felt certain. Now they've gone to war without counting their bullets first. I'm feeling pretty confident now saying it's the former.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US troops in Iran racing ...