Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(168,516 posts)
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 08:33 AM 18 hrs ago

U.S. payrolls unexpectedly fell by 92,000 in February; unemployment rate rises to 4.4%

Source: CNBC

Published Fri, Mar 6 2026 8:31 AM EST Updated 3 Min Ago


The U.S. economy lost jobs in February, a month marred by severe winter weather and a strike at a major health care provider, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 for the month, compared to the estimate for 50,000 and below the downwardly revised January total of 126,000. February marked the third time in the past five months that payrolls declined, following a sharp revision showing a drop of 17,000 in December.



At the same time, the unemployment rate edged higher to 4.4% as jobs declined across key areas. A broader measure of unemployment that includes discouraged workers and those holding part-time positions for economic reasons moved lower, at 7.9% or 0.2 percentage point below the January level.



Health care, the primary growth driver in payrolls, saw a loss of 28,000 due largely to a strike at Kaiser Permanente that sidelined more than 30,000 workers in Hawaii and California. Though the strike has since been resolved, it occurred during the BLS survey week so it subtracted from the jobs total.




Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/06/february-2026-jobs-report.html



From the source -




BLS-Labor Statistics
@BLS_gov
Payroll employment edges down 92,000 in February; unemployment rate changes little at 4.4% https://bls.gov/news.release/e
mpsit.nr0.htm
#JobsReport #BLSdata
8:31 AM � Mar 6, 2026





It's that Friday again. Stay tuned for the DU economy analysts for their deep dives.

Article updated.

Previous articles -

Published Fri, Mar 6 2026 8:31 AM EST Updated 3 Min Ago


The U.S. economy lost jobs in February, a month marred by severe winter weather and a strike at a major health care provider, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 for the month, compared to the estimate for 50,000 and below the downwardly revised January total of 126,000. February marked the third time in the past five months that payrolls declined, following a sharp revision showing a drop of 17,000 in December.

At the same time, the unemployment rate edged higher to 4.4% as jobs declined across key areas. A broader measure of unemployment that includes discouraged workers and those holding part-time positions for economic reasons moved lower, at 7.9% or 0.2 percentage point below the January level.

Health care, the primary growth driver in payrolls, saw a loss of 28,000 due largely to a strike at Kaiser Permanente that sidelined more than 30,000 workers in Hawaii and California. Though the strike has since been resolved, it occurred during the BLS survey week so it subtracted from the jobs total.


Published Fri, Mar 6 2026 8:31 AM EST Updated 2 Min Ago


The U.S. economy lost jobs in February, a month marred by severe winter weather and a strike at a major health care provider, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 for the month, compared to the estimate for 50,000 and below the downwardly revised January total of 126,000. February marked the third time in the past five months that payrolls declined, following a sharp revision showing a drop of 17,000 in December. At the same time, the unemployment rate edged higher to 4.4% as jobs declined across key areas.

Health care, the primary growth driver in payrolls, saw a loss of 28,000 due largely to a strike at Kaiser Permanente that sidelined more than 30,000 workers in Hawaii and California. Though the strike has since been resolved, it occurred during the BLS survey week so it subtracted from the jobs total.


This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.


Original article -

Published Fri, Mar 6 2026 8:31 AM EST


Nonfarm payrolls were expected to increase 50,000 in February while the unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, according to Dow Jones consensus estimates.

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Johnny2X2X

(24,041 posts)
1. Complete disaster
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 09:01 AM
18 hrs ago

I don't think people get how bad Trump has been on jobs. Even in his first term job creation was below average even before Covid. To add only 120,000 jobs in all of 2025 is dropping off a cliff. To lose 92,000 in February is a total disaster.

Javaman

(65,595 posts)
3. "unexpectedly fell".
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 09:47 AM
17 hrs ago

given the history of the orange pedo's room full of dopes cooking the books, I don' think any of this is "unexpected"

what would be "unexpected" would be actual job creation to match need.

BumRushDaShow

(168,516 posts)
7. "Unexpected" in that the business analysts and media
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 09:55 AM
17 hrs ago

"expected" an INCREASE of something along the line of the ADP numbers reported earlier this week, which were around the "60,000" range (although that only surveys "private sector" jobs). But...

BumRushDaShow

(168,516 posts)
8. Since the image has a little NBC logo
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 09:57 AM
17 hrs ago

am thinking it was something used either during Fallon's show, Seth Meyer's show, or maybe SNL.

Ray Bruns

(6,227 posts)
5. I want to see a show of hands of who thought Trumps second term wasn't going to be a total disaster.
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 09:50 AM
17 hrs ago

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Fry?

eppur_se_muova

(41,672 posts)
6. Unexpected by whom ? I mean, besides the clowns supposedly running this country ?
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 09:51 AM
17 hrs ago

For the rest of us, all bad news -- particularly that due to incompetence or sheer malice -- is to be considered "expected".

progree

(12,890 posts)
9. Actually This is a MINUS 161k report: Minus 92k for Feb. and previous 2 months revised down by combined 69k: -161k Tot
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 10:49 AM
16 hrs ago

And no, I'm not double-counting or anything like that.

In January's report, which came out 2/11/26, there were 158,627,000 non-farm payroll jobs [1]

In February's report (today's), there were 158,466,000 non-farm payroll jobs [2]

Difference: -161,000

[1] January report news summary, see Table B-1 in: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02112026.htm

[2] February report news summary, see Table B-1 in: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_03062026.htm

From the 2nd link,

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for December was revised down by 65,000, from
+48,000 to -17,000, and the change for January was revised down by 4,000, from +130,000 to
+126,000. With these revisions, employment in December and January combined is 69,000 lower
than previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional reports received from
businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the
recalculation of seasonal factors.)


================================================

Another issue --
PRIVATE sector job growth in February was -86,000 jobs, also Table B-1 -- this is the number to compare to ADP's report Wednesday
which was: +63,000 private sector
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143626323

Not too far off in magnitude, but wrong sign.

progree

(12,890 posts)
10. Black unemployment rate: Feb'25: 6.0%, Jan'26: 7.3%, Feb'26:7.7%
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 11:09 AM
15 hrs ago

Black unemployment rate:
Feb 2025: 6.0%,
Jan 2026: 7.3%,
Feb 2026: 7.7%

The corresponding white unemployment rates are 3.8%, 3.7%, and 3.7%

Summary table A. in https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_03062026.htm

mathematic

(1,609 posts)
11. The labor force was basically flat last year (+42k since feb '25), due to kicking immigrants out.
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 11:25 AM
15 hrs ago

People occasionally post things like "We need 150k jobs a month to break even due to population growth." I don't think that's been true since the 90s and the actual number for this past year is 3.5k jobs per month.

It's predictable: you kick out immigrants when we have full employment and you got no job growth and actual job losses for people who's jobs depended on the work those immigrants were doing. And that's before you get into the harmful effect of tariffs damaging business creation and expansion.

Tumbulu

(6,630 posts)
12. who was not expecting this?
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 01:57 PM
13 hrs ago

I am just baffled by the lack of recognition of the multidimensional disaster that we are living within.

Most smaller businesses cannot survive all of these crazy jolts. I have no idea how the big guys are doing. It is absolutely bizarre to me that the writers of the article chose the word "unexpectedly" .

LetMyPeopleVote

(178,495 posts)
13. MaddowBlog-U.S. economy lost 92,000 jobs in February as Trump-era job market continues to suffer
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 02:30 PM
12 hrs ago

The more the president insists the economy is amazing, the more we’re confronted with evidence to the contrary.

Job growth over 14 months of Trump’s second term: 150,000 jobs
The previous 14 months: 1.74 million jobs

Under Biden: 0 months of job losses
Trump’s second term: losses in two of the last three months, three of the last five months, and five of the last nine months.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-03-06T14:04:46.620Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/u-s-economy-lost-92000-jobs-in-february-as-trump-era-job-market-continues-to-suffer

Expectations heading into this week showed projections of about 50,000 new jobs being created in the United States in February. As it turns out, according to the new report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the totals fell far short of those expectations. CNBC reported:

Nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 for the month, compared to the estimate for 50,000 and below the downwardly revised January total of 126,000. February marked the third time in the past five months that payrolls declined, following a sharp revision showing a drop of 17,000 in December.

At the same time, the unemployment rate edged higher to 4.4% as jobs declined across key areas.


There is no good news here. In fact, during Joe Biden’s four years in the White House, there wasn’t a single month in which the U.S. economy actually lost jobs. It’s become far more common lately: The economy not only shed jobs in February, it also lost jobs in two of the last three months, three of the last five months and five of the last nine months.

All told, Donald Trump has been in the White House for 14 months, and during that time the cumulative total is 150,000 jobs. Over the 14 months preceding the Republican president’s return to power, the American economy added 1.74 million jobs.....

To contextualize the data, I put together this chart to show month-to-month totals since the 2020 election. The blue columns point to Biden’s presidency, while the red columns point to Trump’s.



It remains to be seen whether the president responds to the developments by firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (again).

The question for the White House remains simple: If Trump has created the greatest economy in history, why has American job growth slowed to its lowest pace since the Great Recession?

progree

(12,890 posts)
14. Yes, we all knew that after COOKING THE BOOKS and REPORTING 130,000 jobs gained in January, they'd follow the next month
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 07:45 PM
7 hrs ago

by REPORTING a 92,000 job loss (161,000 loss including prior 2 months' downward revisions). It was inevitable, we ALL expected the BLS book-cookers would report big losses like this, I guess.

Particularly after non-government payroll processor ADP reported, just 2 days ago, that private sector jobs increased by 63,000 in February.

Here's the January thread where the KK! Brigade and our other SPITR types were out in full force pointing out that they cooked the books
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143614651

(KK! Brigade - the Krasnov Krasnov! Brigade
SPITR types - Smartest People In The Room types)

On this thread, we're not seeing the KK! Brigade, and instead the SPITR types are all proclaiming that they expected the BLS to report an essentially six-figure job loss all along. "Who didn't expect this?"

I didn't see any predictions like that at all prior to the release of this report, but maybe somebody could point me to all of them, or maybe just one or two. I only saw a prediction that they'd report even larger job gains than in January.

SamuelAdams

(5 posts)
15. Why are there always excuses for Republicans?
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 09:31 PM
5 hrs ago

February usually has winter weather and there are many strikes. The jobs numbers have been awful under him because of his tariffs.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. payrolls unexpectedl...