U.S. payrolls unexpectedly fell by 92,000 in February; unemployment rate rises to 4.4%
Source: CNBC
Published Fri, Mar 6 2026 8:31 AM EST Updated 3 Min Ago
The U.S. economy lost jobs in February, a month marred by severe winter weather and a strike at a major health care provider, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.
Nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 for the month, compared to the estimate for 50,000 and below the downwardly revised January total of 126,000. February marked the third time in the past five months that payrolls declined, following a sharp revision showing a drop of 17,000 in December.

At the same time, the unemployment rate edged higher to 4.4% as jobs declined across key areas. A broader measure of unemployment that includes discouraged workers and those holding part-time positions for economic reasons moved lower, at 7.9% or 0.2 percentage point below the January level.

Health care, the primary growth driver in payrolls, saw a loss of 28,000 due largely to a strike at Kaiser Permanente that sidelined more than 30,000 workers in Hawaii and California. Though the strike has since been resolved, it occurred during the BLS survey week so it subtracted from the jobs total.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/06/february-2026-jobs-report.html
From the source -
Link to tweet
@BLS_gov
Payroll employment edges down 92,000 in February; unemployment rate changes little at 4.4% https://bls.gov/news.release/e
mpsit.nr0.htm
#JobsReport #BLSdata
8:31 AM � Mar 6, 2026

It's that Friday again. Stay tuned for the DU economy analysts for their deep dives.
Article updated.
Previous articles -
The U.S. economy lost jobs in February, a month marred by severe winter weather and a strike at a major health care provider, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.
Nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 for the month, compared to the estimate for 50,000 and below the downwardly revised January total of 126,000. February marked the third time in the past five months that payrolls declined, following a sharp revision showing a drop of 17,000 in December.
At the same time, the unemployment rate edged higher to 4.4% as jobs declined across key areas. A broader measure of unemployment that includes discouraged workers and those holding part-time positions for economic reasons moved lower, at 7.9% or 0.2 percentage point below the January level.
Health care, the primary growth driver in payrolls, saw a loss of 28,000 due largely to a strike at Kaiser Permanente that sidelined more than 30,000 workers in Hawaii and California. Though the strike has since been resolved, it occurred during the BLS survey week so it subtracted from the jobs total.
The U.S. economy lost jobs in February, a month marred by severe winter weather and a strike at a major health care provider, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.
Nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 for the month, compared to the estimate for 50,000 and below the downwardly revised January total of 126,000. February marked the third time in the past five months that payrolls declined, following a sharp revision showing a drop of 17,000 in December. At the same time, the unemployment rate edged higher to 4.4% as jobs declined across key areas.
Health care, the primary growth driver in payrolls, saw a loss of 28,000 due largely to a strike at Kaiser Permanente that sidelined more than 30,000 workers in Hawaii and California. Though the strike has since been resolved, it occurred during the BLS survey week so it subtracted from the jobs total.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
Original article -
Nonfarm payrolls were expected to increase 50,000 in February while the unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, according to Dow Jones consensus estimates.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
Johnny2X2X
(24,041 posts)I don't think people get how bad Trump has been on jobs. Even in his first term job creation was below average even before Covid. To add only 120,000 jobs in all of 2025 is dropping off a cliff. To lose 92,000 in February is a total disaster.
Hugin
(37,770 posts)Its no surprise.
Javaman
(65,595 posts)given the history of the orange pedo's room full of dopes cooking the books, I don' think any of this is "unexpected"
what would be "unexpected" would be actual job creation to match need.
BumRushDaShow
(168,516 posts)"expected" an INCREASE of something along the line of the ADP numbers reported earlier this week, which were around the "60,000" range (although that only surveys "private sector" jobs). But...
Ray Bruns
(6,227 posts)BumRushDaShow
(168,516 posts)am thinking it was something used either during Fallon's show, Seth Meyer's show, or maybe SNL.
Ray Bruns
(6,227 posts)Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Fry?
eppur_se_muova
(41,672 posts)For the rest of us, all bad news -- particularly that due to incompetence or sheer malice -- is to be considered "expected".
progree
(12,890 posts)And no, I'm not double-counting or anything like that.
In January's report, which came out 2/11/26, there were 158,627,000 non-farm payroll jobs [1]
In February's report (today's), there were 158,466,000 non-farm payroll jobs [2]
Difference: -161,000
[1] January report news summary, see Table B-1 in: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02112026.htm
[2] February report news summary, see Table B-1 in: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_03062026.htm
From the 2nd link,
+48,000 to -17,000, and the change for January was revised down by 4,000, from +130,000 to
+126,000. With these revisions, employment in December and January combined is 69,000 lower
than previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional reports received from
businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the
recalculation of seasonal factors.)
================================================
Another issue --
PRIVATE sector job growth in February was -86,000 jobs, also Table B-1 -- this is the number to compare to ADP's report Wednesday
which was: +63,000 private sector
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143626323
Not too far off in magnitude, but wrong sign.
progree
(12,890 posts)Black unemployment rate:
Feb 2025: 6.0%,
Jan 2026: 7.3%,
Feb 2026: 7.7%
The corresponding white unemployment rates are 3.8%, 3.7%, and 3.7%
Summary table A. in https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_03062026.htm
mathematic
(1,609 posts)People occasionally post things like "We need 150k jobs a month to break even due to population growth." I don't think that's been true since the 90s and the actual number for this past year is 3.5k jobs per month.
It's predictable: you kick out immigrants when we have full employment and you got no job growth and actual job losses for people who's jobs depended on the work those immigrants were doing. And that's before you get into the harmful effect of tariffs damaging business creation and expansion.
Tumbulu
(6,630 posts)I am just baffled by the lack of recognition of the multidimensional disaster that we are living within.
Most smaller businesses cannot survive all of these crazy jolts. I have no idea how the big guys are doing. It is absolutely bizarre to me that the writers of the article chose the word "unexpectedly" .
LetMyPeopleVote
(178,495 posts)The more the president insists the economy is amazing, the more were confronted with evidence to the contrary.
Job growth over 14 months of Trumpâs second term: 150,000 jobs
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-03-06T14:04:46.620Z
The previous 14 months: 1.74 million jobs
Under Biden: 0 months of job losses
Trumpâs second term: losses in two of the last three months, three of the last five months, and five of the last nine months.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/u-s-economy-lost-92000-jobs-in-february-as-trump-era-job-market-continues-to-suffer
Nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 for the month, compared to the estimate for 50,000 and below the downwardly revised January total of 126,000. February marked the third time in the past five months that payrolls declined, following a sharp revision showing a drop of 17,000 in December.
At the same time, the unemployment rate edged higher to 4.4% as jobs declined across key areas.
There is no good news here. In fact, during Joe Bidens four years in the White House, there wasnt a single month in which the U.S. economy actually lost jobs. Its become far more common lately: The economy not only shed jobs in February, it also lost jobs in two of the last three months, three of the last five months and five of the last nine months.
All told, Donald Trump has been in the White House for 14 months, and during that time the cumulative total is 150,000 jobs. Over the 14 months preceding the Republican presidents return to power, the American economy added 1.74 million jobs.....
To contextualize the data, I put together this chart to show month-to-month totals since the 2020 election. The blue columns point to Bidens presidency, while the red columns point to Trumps.

It remains to be seen whether the president responds to the developments by firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (again).
The question for the White House remains simple: If Trump has created the greatest economy in history, why has American job growth slowed to its lowest pace since the Great Recession?
progree
(12,890 posts)by REPORTING a 92,000 job loss (161,000 loss including prior 2 months' downward revisions). It was inevitable, we ALL expected the BLS book-cookers would report big losses like this, I guess.
Particularly after non-government payroll processor ADP reported, just 2 days ago, that private sector jobs increased by 63,000 in February.
Here's the January thread where the KK! Brigade and our other SPITR types were out in full force pointing out that they cooked the books
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143614651
(KK! Brigade - the Krasnov Krasnov! Brigade
SPITR types - Smartest People In The Room types)
On this thread, we're not seeing the KK! Brigade, and instead the SPITR types are all proclaiming that they expected the BLS to report an essentially six-figure job loss all along. "Who didn't expect this?"
I didn't see any predictions like that at all prior to the release of this report, but maybe somebody could point me to all of them, or maybe just one or two. I only saw a prediction that they'd report even larger job gains than in January.
SamuelAdams
(5 posts)February usually has winter weather and there are many strikes. The jobs numbers have been awful under him because of his tariffs.