US customs agency says it cannot comply with tariff refund order
Source: Financial Times, via Reuters
US customs agency says it cannot comply with tariff refund order
By Reuters
March 6, 2026 10:37 AM EST Updated 23 mins ago
WILMINGTON, Del., March 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency is unable to comply with a court order directing it to refund tariffs that the Supreme Court has ruled illegal, the agency said in a court filing with the U.S. Court for International Trade on Friday.
Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; writing by Ryan Patrick Jones in Toronto; editing by Susan Heavey
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/business/us-customs-agency-says-it-cannot-comply-with-tariff-refund-order-2026-03-06/
That's the whole story at Reuters right now.
The FT is subscription-only. I think this is the link:
https://www.ft.com/content/0315349e-763e-4faa-a5b1-c02ce7801cbd
My suggestion: put a lien on the 747 that Qatar so generously gave to the United States. Auction it off to the highest bidder and use the proceeds to start paying off what's owed.
Hat tip, Kevin M. Kruse
Pretty sure when they started imposing this idiocy they assured a bunch of judges that they would be able to refund the money with no problem if it ever came to that.
— Kevin M. Kruse (@kevinmkruse.bsky.social) 2026-03-06T15:53:07.808Z
*******
Kevin M. Kruse
@kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Pretty sure when they started imposing this idiocy they assured a bunch of judges that they would be able to refund the money with no problem if it ever came to that.
FinTwitter
@fintwitter.bsky.social
� 40m
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER DIRECTING TARIFF REFUNDS -COURT FILING
10:53 AM � Mar 6, 2026
*******
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER DIRECTING TARIFF REFUNDS -COURT FILING
— FinTwitter (@fintwitter.bsky.social) 2026-03-06T15:25:20.194081+00:00
*******
FinTwitter
@fintwitter.bsky.social
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER DIRECTING TARIFF REFUNDS -COURT FILING
10:25 AM � Mar 6, 2026
*******
Apparently, the original source is the Financial Times:
— Jeffrey Brown (@texasgeologist.bsky.social) 2026-03-06T15:43:50.979Z
www.reuters.com/business/us-...
*******
Jeffrey Brown
@texasgeologist.bsky.social
Apparently, the original source is the Financial Times:
https://www.reuters.com/business/us-companies-are-being-denied-refunds-trumps-illegal-tariffs-ft-reports-2026-03-06/
US companies denied refunds on Trump's illegal tariffs, FT reports
The U.S. government has declined to refund tariffs the Supreme Court ruled illegal last month, the Financial Times reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter.
www.reuters.com
10:43 AM � Mar 6, 2026
*******
cutroot
(1,026 posts)dweller
(28,191 posts)Pocket of the fat pisswigged grifter in chief
✌🏻
Baitball Blogger
(52,152 posts)quakerboy
(14,828 posts)Good at losing money. Not sure he can be called good at laundering it.
2naSalit
(102,001 posts)the Treasury account, it's all been distributed into -45's accounts and he has no intent in paying any of it to anyone.
Ocelot II
(130,187 posts)But wouldn't the refunds come directly from the Treasury Department, since that's where the tariffs are paid in the first place?
sinkingfeeling
(57,698 posts)bucolic_frolic
(54,812 posts)Expect foot dragging and stonewalling on everything
moonshinegnomie
(3,993 posts)Klarkashton
(5,205 posts)No thought given to anything but a rush to comply with a stupid trump proclamation.
mahatmakanejeeves
(69,199 posts)By Reuters
March 6, 2026 5:14 AM EST Updated 3 hours ago
March 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. government has declined to refund tariffs the Supreme Court ruled illegal last month, the Financial Times reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. ... The customs officials are denying companies' requests to recover duties imposed under emergency powers invoked by U.S. President Donald Trump, leaving businesses uncertain and driving more disputes into court, the FT said.
The U.S. government collected more than $130 billion in illegal tariff payments, which were central to Trump's trade policy. The Supreme Court did not provide guidance for issuing refunds, creating confusion over how importers would be reimbursed.
On Wednesday, a U.S. trade court judge ordered the government to begin paying potentially billions of dollars in refunds to importers who paid tariffs. ... Many companies have rushed to submit Post Summary Corrections to remove International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariff codes from shipment entries and seek refunds, but U.S. Customs and Border Protection has been rejecting those submissions and suspending protests filed over repayments of IEEPA tariffs that had already been liquidated, the FT said.
Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House and CBP did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
Reporting by Devika Nair in Bengaluru Editing by Tomasz Janowski
bluestarone
(21,998 posts)They will say fuck the courts, fuck congress. There thoughts will be "What are you gonna do about it?" That's where we are at.
ananda
(34,876 posts)Well, to be fair, an illegal war is very costly.
But then, so is moving money into Trump's
shitlined pockets.
displacedvermoter
(4,212 posts)could just write a check. That is what he said he would do when asked about paying Trump for his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS? No problem, right?
EarthFirst
(4,074 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(22,854 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(69,199 posts)@financialtimes.com
US companies denied refunds on Trumps illegal tariffs
ft.trib.al/niHJonr
Translate
US companies denied refunds on Trumps illegal tariffs
Customs officials are rejecting attempts to reclaim duties that were struck down by the Supreme Court
ft.trib.al
11:19 AM · Mar 6, 2026
US companies denied refunds on Trumpâs illegal tariffs ft.trib.al/niHJonr
— Financial Times (@financialtimes.com) 2026-03-06T16:19:39.586920Z
mahatmakanejeeves
(69,199 posts)@jnavas.com
US Judge to Meet Parties on Trump-Tariff Refunds in Closed-Door 'Settlement Conference' @reuters.com 🍿
Government says millions of records may need manual review 🙄
Around 2,000 refund lawsuits filed by US importers 😮
Conference scheduled for 10:30 a.m. ET
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-judge-meet-parties-trump-tariff-refunds-closed-door-settlement-conference-2026-03-06/
Exclusive: US judge to meet parties on Trump-tariff refunds in closed-door 'settlement conference'
A U.S. judge will meet behind closed doors with government lawyers on Friday seeking to hammer out a process to refund up to $175 billion in illegally collected tariffs, a meeting a court official de...
www.reuters.com
10:54 AM · Mar 6, 2026
US Judge to Meet Parties on Trump-Tariff Refunds in Closed-Door 'Settlement Conference' @reuters.com ð¿
— John Navas âµð (@jnavas.com) 2026-03-06T15:54:21.719Z
⢠Government says millions of records may need manual review ð
⢠Around 2,000 refund lawsuits filed by US importers ð®
⢠Conference scheduled for 10:30 a.m. ET
www.reuters.com/world/us-jud...
By Tom Hals
March 6, 2026 12:19 AM EST Updated 49 mins ago
Summary
* Government says unable to comply with court order
* Around 2,000 refund lawsuits filed by US importers on illegal tariffs
March 6 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge will meet behind closed doors with government lawyers on Friday seeking to hammer out a process to refund up to $166 billion in illegally collected tariffs, a meeting a court official described as a "settlement conference."
Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade will meet with lawyers representing the customs agency responsible for reimbursing more than 300,000 importers that paid the tariffs, which were struck down last month as unconstitutional.
Just as the meeting was scheduled to start, a top customs official informed the court that his agency was unable to comply with the judge's directive earlier this week to use its existing system to generate automatic tariff refunds. Businesses have raised concerns about what they expect to be a months- or years-long process to get refunds.
U.S. courts are presumed to be open to the public, although judges will sometimes hold private meetings with parties to discuss scheduling or how to handle sensitive information.
{snip}
Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Noeleen Walder, Dan Burns, William Mallard and David Gaffen
mathematic
(1,609 posts)It's plainly obvious that they should have stopped the implementation of these tariffs until they were found to be legal.
It's plainly obvious that they must stop the replacement tariffs immediately until they are found to be legal. (They aren't.)
Bayard
(29,349 posts)And we aren't getting our tariff dividends. My goodness--where has all that money gone?
The Supremes will have to order him to return the money. They should have done it while they decided they were illegal. Companies will wait years for that money, or until Dems are back in power. We will have to clean up another trump mess that we will probably get blamed for.
quakerboy
(14,828 posts)Has to come from somewhere. Then ice had to be expanded to control future elections. Plus now theres a war to fund
Mysterian
(6,349 posts)Now comply with giving the money back.
Old Crank
(6,870 posts)until they find the records of collection.
They should have records of what they charged people.
quakerboy
(14,828 posts)What legal basis do they have to decline to obey a court order?
I read the whole thread, and didnt see one assertion addressing why.