Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(168,533 posts)
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 11:13 AM 22 hrs ago

Best way forward for Iran would be negotiated settlement, says Starmer

Source: The Guardian

Thu 5 Mar 2026 12.28 EST
Last modified on Thu 5 Mar 2026 23.55 EST


Keir Starmer has said the conflict engulfing the Middle East could continue “for some time” as he insisted the best way forward in the longer term was a negotiated settlement with Iran.

The prime minister said the UK was doing “everything we can” to de-escalate the situation, a clear contrast to the US president, who is focused on regime change and has said it was “too late” for Tehran to negotiate. He defended his decision to block initial offensive strikes by the US and Israel at the weekend, saying he stood by his judgment and denying it had damaged the special relationship.

Starmer has faced some criticism from Gulf states and Cyprus for not doing enough to protect regional allies and British citizens there from Iranian strikes. He has also been subject to personal attacks from Trump, including that he was “not Winston Churchill”.

But the prime minister has urged the US president to de-escalate the conflict and negotiate with Iran to abandon its nuclear programme. Trump, meanwhile, has said he needs to be personally involved in selecting Iran’s next leader.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/mar/05/best-way-forward-for-iran-would-be-negotiated-settlement-says-starmer

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Hugin

(37,774 posts)
2. Negotiations with whom?
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 11:23 AM
21 hrs ago

That’s why knocking out a supreme leader in the first strike is a very bad idea.

William Seger

(12,382 posts)
7. It's like they WANTED to create thousands of new jihadists who will gladly die trying to kill us
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 11:45 AM
21 hrs ago

... to replace an 86-year-old, soon to die anyway, leader with someone younger and meaner, just to satisfy Netyanyahu's vindictiveness.

William Seger

(12,382 posts)
3. They're delusional to think Iran will go for that when they know their advantage
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 11:27 AM
21 hrs ago

Tens of thousands of cheap drones, and we don't have enough very expensive missiles to stop all of them.

JBTaurus83

(1,139 posts)
5. Why?
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 11:33 AM
21 hrs ago

The USA has gone back on every negotiation. Israel doesn’t want negotiation anyhow, they want a failed state.

Bayard

(29,349 posts)
8. The, "settlement," in Gaza has gone so well
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 12:18 PM
21 hrs ago


Bibi has trump doing most of his dirty work this time. The Palestinians didn't have any weapons, but Iran will go down fighting, in their homeland and abroad.

Ray Bruns

(6,227 posts)
9. Why should they negotiate? That's what they were doing and Israel and the US started dropping bombs.
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 12:34 PM
20 hrs ago

Why should they trust us?

Martin68

(27,515 posts)
10. How could any country rely on an agreement with the Trump administration? They aren't worth the paper they are
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 12:35 PM
20 hrs ago

printed on.

BaronChocula

(4,418 posts)
11. Well trump said total surrender was the only solution
Fri Mar 6, 2026, 04:57 PM
16 hrs ago

So Rear Starmer either knows something or knows nothing.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Best way forward for Iran...