Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:12 PM Jan 2012

BP must cover some Transocean liabilities for oil spill

Source: BBC

26 January 2012 Last updated at 23:44 GMT

BP must cover some Transocean liabilities for oil spill

BP must cover some but not all of oil rig owner Transocean's liabilities for the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, a US judge has ruled.

US District Judge Carl Barbier said that Transocean was shielded by its contract with BP from having to pay many pollution claims.

But Transocean must cover its own legal fees and is not exempt from paying punitive damages and civil penalties.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16753061

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BP must cover some Transocean liabilities for oil spill (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2012 OP
throughout the American media the focus has been on the judge clearing some damages. alp227 Jan 2012 #1
Reuters didn't dipsydoodle Jan 2012 #2

alp227

(32,034 posts)
1. throughout the American media the focus has been on the judge clearing some damages.
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:16 AM
Jan 2012

CNN: "Judge clears Transocean of some damages in Deepwater Horizon spill"
Wall Street Journal: "Rig Owner Spared Some Spill Costs" (didn't provide a link, google the title for full WSJ articles)
New York Times: "Ruling Favors Owner of Rig in Gulf Spill"
New Orleans Times-Picayune: "Judge says Transocean will be shielded from paying pollution claims"
Associated Press: "Judge: BP contract shields rig owner Transocean from some Gulf spill claims"

vs. the British media:
The Guardian: "Gulf of Mexico oil spill: BP loses bid to make others pay compensation"
The Telegraph: "BP contract shields Transocean from some Gulf spill claims, judge rules" (the title of this article is more like the American titles)
Financial Times: "BP blow in legal fight over gulf spill" (http://liveweb.archive.org/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/42702470-486a-11e1-941c-00144feabdc0.html)

So basically by reading the American news you'd think BP got off the hook, but by reading the British media (including your BBC link) you'd cheer because BP would still be held accountable.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
2. Reuters didn't
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:28 AM
Jan 2012

BP must cover some Transocean oil spill damages.

(Reuters) - A federal judge on Thursday said BP Plc must indemnify Transocean Ltd for some compensatory damage claims over the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier, who oversees multistate litigation over the spill, agreed with Transocean that the Swiss driller was not responsible for compensatory damage claims raised by third parties for oil spilled below the ocean surface.

He also ruled, however, that London-based BP need not indemnify Transocean for punitive damages, or civil penalties imposed by the U.S. government under the federal Clean Water Act.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/27/us-bp-transocean-idUSTRE80Q00E20120127

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BP must cover some Transo...