Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomWilm

(1,960 posts)
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 11:44 AM 2 hrs ago

Denmark considered destroying Greenland runways amid fears of US attack

Source: Euractiv / DR National Danish public-service

Denmark is reported to have quietly prepared to blow up its own runways in Greenland – as European allies rushed troops north – amid fears that the United States might attempt to seize the Arctic territory by force in January.

According to reporting by Danish national broadcaster DR, citing multiple senior sources in Copenhagen and across Europe, Danish forces deployed to Greenland in January 2026 carried explosives intended to destroy key airstrips in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq, in order to deny access to any incoming US military aircraft in a worst-case scenario.

The episode suggests the extent to which Denmark and its European allies appear to have considered – and prepared for – a potential military confrontation with the United States, highlighting strains in transatlantic relations and adding momentum to Europe’s push for greater strategic autonomy.

... The deployments were reportedly not merely symbolic. Aircraft are said to have transported blood supplies from Danish hospitals, indicating preparations for potential combat casualties. Danish F-35 fighter jets were reportedly armed and repositioned, while French naval assets and multinational troops were sent toward the Arctic. Several other European countries also hastily sent soldiers to Greenland at the height of the crisis ...

The US military operation in Venezuela on 3 January 2026 was a turning point. For European officials, the move demonstrated that President Donald Trump was willing to use force – elevating concerns that his repeated statements about “taking” Greenland might translate into action. ...

Read more: https://www.euractiv.com/news/denmark-considered-destroying-greenland-runways-amid-fears-of-us-attack/



My comment

The US bully methods require a reaction, but the Danish prime minister's investment in NATO and military hardware is a devastating mistake that does not create peace. Greenlanders, Danes and other helpers should instead prepare to defend Greenland completely without the use of weapons.

It is completely hopeless for tiny Denmark to defend with weapons against such a military giant. Therefore, stop the military fantasies about a "stumbling block", i.e. setting up one's own soldiers up for a quick defeat, as a sign that military resistance was tried and defeated.

That an active non-violent defense stands strongest against Trump's invasion forces can be seen in another of Trump's battlegrounds – namely on the streets of Minnesota and the other attacked cities in the USA. Here, ordinary citizens have successfully dampened the pressure from Trump's militia with such force that the active opposition of civil society actually forced Trump to retreat.

These completely fresh experiences are nicely in line with decades of research into how best to fight oppression, dictatorship and invasions. The chance of a lasting success in the fight for peace has been shown to be significantly higher when it is a broad part of the population that protests by peaceful means.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Denmark considered destroying Greenland runways amid fears of US attack (Original Post) TomWilm 2 hrs ago OP
I heartily disagree. Denmark very reasonably concluded that involving troops from France Ocelot II 2 hrs ago #1
Danish or EU troops would make absolutely no difference .. TomWilm 2 hrs ago #2
So what should Greenland and Denmark do? Ocelot II 2 hrs ago #4
I struggled to write a response, thanks for doing so displacedvermoter 2 hrs ago #3
What a load of codswallop. Spazito 2 hrs ago #5
Not to mention horsefeathers, balderdash and malarkey. Ocelot II 2 hrs ago #6
Exactly, well said! Spazito 1 hr ago #7
Aren't we all just so proud bagimin 1 hr ago #8

Ocelot II

(130,355 posts)
1. I heartily disagree. Denmark very reasonably concluded that involving troops from France
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 11:55 AM
2 hrs ago

and the other Nordics would be a strong deterrent. And so far it has been. You can't compare this situation to ICE in Minneapolis; there were more people in a single Minneapolis demonstration than the entire population of Greenland, and the goal of ICE was not the seizure of sovereign territory (although sometimes it felt that way). Denmark reacting nonviolently to a US invasion would result in complete capitulation and the forfeiture of Greenland, but the presence of other European allies responding to the attempted taking of sovereign territory would set up a situation (NATO vs. NATO) that would be so politically toxic that even Trump would avoid it. He cares about politics, not harm to humans, and he's starting to seeing that play out wrt Iran. Greenland and Minneapolis aren't apples and oranges; they're apples and pipe wrenches. Not even close.

TomWilm

(1,960 posts)
2. Danish or EU troops would make absolutely no difference ..
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 12:10 PM
2 hrs ago

... this would be a NATO country attacking another member any way it went down. Maybe the US would get some dead soldiers, which Trump then could brag about - evidence of the hostile Danes. Such meaningless resistance is just stupid!

Ocelot II

(130,355 posts)
4. So what should Greenland and Denmark do?
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 12:19 PM
2 hrs ago

Nonviolence worked against ICE in Minneapolis because ICE wasn't the US Army trying to take over the state by force; they were a bunch of goons sent to kidnap and disappear immigrants. We dealt with them nonviolently and effectively by following them, recording them, notifying the neighborhood that they were present, protesting everywhere, and making it very difficult for them to function. This is a metropolitan area of more than 3 million people while Greenland's population is about 50,000. What are those people supposed to do if Trump sends US troops? Hold demonstrations and wave homemade cardboard signs? Record them on their phones? Blow whistles? Throw dildos at them? How do you think Denmark should resist? Or should they just capitulate and give up Greenland, effectively telling the rest of the world that they can't fight back if Trump comes for their territory as well?

displacedvermoter

(4,327 posts)
3. I struggled to write a response, thanks for doing so
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 12:10 PM
2 hrs ago

for me.

Denmark was occupied by another fascist power not so many years ago, and I believe they are a proud people not willing to stand
for an assault from a so-called ally. And after what happened in Venezuela, I don't believe "building peace" was on their minds.

Good for Denmark, and her NATO allies.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Denmark considered destro...