ActBlue May Have Misled Congress on Vetting Foreign Donations, Its Lawyers Warned
Source: New York Times
ActBlue May Have Misled Congress on Vetting Foreign Donations, Its Lawyers Warned
The Democratic fund-raising group is facing investigations from the Justice Department and congressional Republicans ahead of the midterm elections.
Listen · 16:48 min
Regina Wallace-Jones, the chief executive of the liberal fund-raising organization ActBlue, at the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. A 2023 letter from her to Congress later played a role in internal turmoil at ActBlue. Todd Heisler/The New York Times
By Reid J. Epstein and Shane Goldmacher
This article is based on internal legal memos, emails, resignation letters, Slack messages and interviews with current and former ActBlue employees.
April 2, 2026, 5:02 a.m. ET
In early 2025, a law firm working for ActBlue, the Democratic fund-raising behemoth, delivered the organization a startling warning. ... The firm concluded that ActBlue's chief executive had given a potentially misleading response to congressional Republican investigators in a 2023 letter explaining how the organization vetted donations to ensure that they were not illegally coming from foreign citizens.
The letter from the chief executive, Regina Wallace-Jones, said ActBlue carried out "multilayered" screenings of contributions that helped "root out" those from overseas. In fact, the law firm found, some of the steps she had described were not always followed.
"This presents a substantial risk for ActBlue," the law firm, Covington & Burling, wrote in one of two memos expressing legal concerns. One memo raised the specter of a criminal investigation if prosecutors believed that ActBlue had tried to conceal facts about its efforts to prevent foreign contributions.
Federal election law prohibits foreign citizens or people who are not permanent residents from donating directly to federal candidates or political action committees. Lying to or obstructing Congress is a crime. ... The memos instigated a meltdown at the highest levels of ActBlue, one of the Democratic Party's most vital financial organs. ... A series of top officials resigned in quick succession. The New York Times revealed those departures last year, but a key cause of the tumult at ActBlue -- the legal warnings about potentially misleading Congress over vetting foreign donations -- is being reported here for the first time.
{snip}
Reid J. Epstein is a Times reporter covering campaigns and elections from Washington.
https://www.nytimes.com/by/reid-j-epstein
Shane Goldmacher is a Times national political correspondent.
https://www.nytimes.com/by/shane-goldmacher
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/02/us/politics/actblue-democrat-fundraising-foreign-donations.html
= new reply since forum marked as read
I don’t care. I’ve read the details and am comfortable with whatever. Will an investigation uncover the Epstein files?
I may or may not be interested in potential wrongdoing memos from forensic accounting based on legal advice that caused ActBlue great concern.
That’s what ethical organizations should do. Always. Test for compliance and act on the results.
Again, are the Epstein files involved?
They will, of course, be checking for such 'illegal donations' from anywhere, right?
Especially this entire administration, as they should be the gold standard in being above such things, yes?
Especially family members who are being paid for shit from foreign entities that surely have no designs against the US, correct?
Or, is every accusation and confession... AGAIN...?
