U.S. payrolls rose by 178,000 in March, more than expected; unemployment at 4.3%
Source: CNBC
Published Fri, Apr 3 2026 8:30 AM EDT Updated 5 Min Ago
The U.S. labor market bounced back in March, with job creation much stronger than expected though the broader picture of a slow-growth labor market held intact.
Nonfarm payrolls rose a seasonally adjusted 178,000 during the month, a reversal from the 133,000 decline in February and better than the Dow Jones consensus estimate for 59,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday. Februarys number was revised down by 41,000 while January was revised up by 34,000 to 160,000, putting the three-month average around 68,000.
The unemployment rate edged lower to 4.3%, though that was largely from a sharp reduction in the labor force.

The bottom line is March was somewhat encouraging, but its been a rocky year for the labor market with almost no hiring since last April, said Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union. The March data will keep the Federal Reserve on hold, but no one is declaring victory yet. Its likely to be a tough spring for job seekers.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/03/jobs-report-march-2026-.html
From the source -
Link to tweet
@BLS_gov
Payroll employment increases by 178,000 in March; unemployment rate changes little at 4.3% https://bls.gov/news.release/e
mpsit.nr0.htm
#JobsReport #BLSdata
8:31 AM · Apr 3, 2026
Stay tuned for DU's dogged analysts for the deep dives and TGIF!
Article updated.
Previous article -
The U.S. labor market bounced back in March, with job creation much stronger than expected though the broader picture of a slow-growth labor market held intact.
Nonfarm payrolls rose a seasonally adjusted 178,000 during the month, a reversal from the 133,000 decline in February and better than the Dow Jones consensus estimate for 59,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday. February's number was revised down by 41,000 while January was revised up by 34,000 to 160,000, putting the three-month average around 68,000.
With job creation higher, the unemployment rate edged lower to 4.3%.
As has been the case, health care was responsible for much of the growth, with the sector adding 76,000. A strike at health-care provider Kaiser Permanente in February took 31,000 off that month's total and has since been settled.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
Original article -
Nonfarm payrolls were expected to increase by 59,000 in March, with the unemployment rate holding at 4.4%, according to the Dow Jones consensus estimate.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
NoMoreRepugs
(12,088 posts)Johnny2X2X
(24,217 posts)This is the devastation of the working class. Weve had a year of no jobs growth. This was nothing more than an average report. But thats welcome considering the jobs disaster that has been happening for the last year.
NoMoreRepugs
(12,088 posts)progree
(12,993 posts)# Nonfarm Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
2024 175 206 228 64 78 87 53 9 155 33 134 237
2025 -48 42 67 108 13 -20 64 -70 76 -140 41 -17
2026 160 -133 178
Johnny2X2X
(24,217 posts)125,000 total jobs added in all of 2025.
progree
(12,993 posts)unless you know of a mistake in their latest numbers.
116k in all of 2025.
Where did you get your number?
ETA OOPS,, I just now noticed you were responding to nomorerepugs, not me, sorry. I changed the subject line too.
But 125k for all of 2025 is not the latest.
NoMoreRepugs
(12,088 posts)progree
(12,993 posts)lapfog_1
(31,906 posts)Trump has replaced people there with his toadies.
Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)They have shed jobs since Trump came in. They have not added people.
wolfie001
(7,688 posts)
https://www.vpm.org/npr-news/npr-news/2025-09-08/former-head-of-the-bureau-of-labor-statistics-discusses-future-of-u-s-labor-data
Interesting discussion with a former head of the BLS. She stated she has fears the data might be altered in the future. This conversation was in September.
Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)Full disclosure: I am a former career statistician who worked very closely with BLS for 33 years at the state level. I remain acutely aware of what is going on at BLS.
wolfie001
(7,688 posts)OrlandoDem2
(3,235 posts)sunflowerseed
(517 posts)newdeal2
(5,440 posts)This whole administration is rigged to not tell the truth.
bucolic_frolic
(55,179 posts)Plus these are the early-AI hires. Once they're on board, 5 times as many can be fired by August - the non-AI employees.
johnnyplankton
(637 posts)My guess is that there's a pretty wide gap from the real numbers...
twodogsbarking
(18,809 posts)Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)twodogsbarking
(18,809 posts)Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)twodogsbarking
(18,809 posts)Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)twodogsbarking
(18,809 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,876 posts)There are 23 companies listed plus one added that is restructuring.
ETA - the msn version has each company's data accessible via clicking on the image of the company in the image viewer and a recap of layoffs will appear below that viewer embed.
Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)Most are global announcements and cover planned layoffs for the entire year 2026. (Many are pretty small too). Those big numbers should be reflected in the BLS data when the layoffs actually happen.
ultralite001
(2,555 posts)"Oracle cutting thousands in latest layoff round as company continues to ramp AI spending"... (30k globally)
"Cutting 20,000 to 30,000 employees could lead to $8 billion to $10 billion in incremental free cash flow, TD Cowen analysts wrote in a January note.
Executives have said its AI investment will pay off, over time."
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/31/oracle-layoffs-ai-spending.html
newdeal2
(5,440 posts)I'm sure Amazon and Meta will be doing more too.
Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)so they wouldn't show up before April at the earliest. Add in that we don't know how many were in the US vs. internationally plus they didn't make clear if all the layoffs were even immediate, or if some won't happen until later.
Most major layoff announcements are for future months. They rarely happen all at once and some end up never happening.
newdeal2
(5,440 posts)I work in tech and follow the employee-led forums and yes there are massive layoffs happening all over.
Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)twodogsbarking
(18,809 posts)Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(5,188 posts)DOW cut 4,500
Morgan Stanley 2,500
Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)on if layoffs already occurred. Amazon laid off 16,000 in January, which would have shown up in February data which currently show a 133,000 drop in jobs nationally - so the Amazon layoffs would seem to be accounted for in the numbers. Dow and Morgan Stanley layoff announcements were of global staff, so we have no idea how many are in the US. Plus Dow layoffs were not announced to be immediate but planned over the course of the year.
Henry203
(931 posts)AllyCat
(18,854 posts)Reports of companies shedding 10s of thousands of jobs. This cannot be true.
choie
(6,908 posts)And would that the media underscore the obvious, that the administration cant be trusted to provide the real numbers. The media is still operating with a pre- trump mindset.
Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)show a drop of 133,000 jobs in February? And February's number was even revised downward significantly. If you thought about it for even 2 seconds, you'd realize your claims make no sense. The data from BLS continue to be legit (for now). It will be obvious if/when that stops being the case.
That doesn't mean the data are 100% accurate. They are based on a sample and are subject to statistical errors. We'll have a better idea of the accuracy after 1st quarter QCEW data is released in August or early September.
Bengus81
(10,173 posts)and the major fertilizing companies hire and hire. That's $hit load of people all over the US.
progree
(12,993 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 3, 2026, 02:09 PM - Edit history (1)
They don't account for unusual deviations, like February being colder than usual for February in much of the country, so that likely affects the January to February and February to March changes, even after seasonal adjustment.
BumRushDaShow
(169,876 posts)From this for January (https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143614651)

to this for February, with about a 4,000 downward revision of January (https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143627754)

to now for March (with a 40,000+ downward revision of Feb. but a 30,000+ upward 2nd revision of Jan.) -

Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)+126,000 to +160,000, and the change for February was revised down by 41,000, from -92,000 to
-133,000.
By the way, the labels on those graphs are incorrect. They say "all employees on private nonfarm payrolls", but the numbers actually represent "total nonfarm payrolls" which includes government. (I understand they are coming from CNBC, but they are mislabeling them).
progree
(12,993 posts)I also don't know why CNBC references FRED. The data series are available from the source of the numbers (BLS)
BELOW are monthly changes in THOUSANDS
# Nonfarm Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
2024 175 206 228 64 78 87 53 9 155 33 134 237
2025 -48 42 67 108 13 -20 64 -70 76 -140 41 -17
2026 160 -133 178
# Nonfarm PRIVATE Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth
2024 126 135 143 63 45 78 -8 -27 142 -4 116 212 < --PRIVATE
2025 -76 40 67 99 20 -45 65 -20 68 13 72 -7 < --PRIVATE
2026 180 -129 186 < --PRIVATE
The last 2 months of both data series are preliminary
Last 3 months:
all non-farm payroll: +68.3k/mo average,
private non-farm payroll: +79.0k/mo average
ADP private non-farm payroll: 46.3k/mo average (see below for the ADP source)
Not that I doubt that FRED echoed the BLS numbers correctly, though I don't have the FRED data series for this (I haven't looked yet, I have screaming tax deadlines)
As for alternate sources of similar information, I only know of the ADP report from the private payroll processor ADP:
# ADP PRIVATE Payrolls: Monthly, Seasonally Adjusted: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ADPMNUSNERSA
Last 6 months in THOUSANDS: +20, +74, +37, +11, +66, +62 < --PRIVATE
Yes, I'm using FRED numbers for the ADP ones because I don't know where to find the ones from ADP itself except for the last month,
The ADP processes payrolls for about 20% of the private sector workforce and estimate the other 80%.
Response to Wiz Imp (Reply #12)
Skittles This message was self-deleted by its author.
ruet
(10,300 posts)
TBF
(36,696 posts)Meta has been terminating large amounts also. It is bad. They are using AI as a cover, but I think it's mostly because the economy is so terrible.
Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)We don't know how many will be in the US. Regardless, they should show up in future months numbers since the only significant layoff I can find prior to the MArch reference period was 16,000 by Amazon in January, which seems to be reflected in the February numbers.
TBF
(36,696 posts)Walleye
(44,862 posts)Wiz Imp
(10,023 posts)If the administration were faking the numbers, they wouldn't be showing a huge drop of 133,000 jobs in February.
Walleye
(44,862 posts)Scott Alan Swaggerty
(335 posts)Not interested in that kind of economy. Pass.
twodogsbarking
(18,809 posts)are willing to kill people you don't know.
progree
(12,993 posts)Meaning that one can have an employment drop and still have a steady or even decreasing unemployment rate.
Note that Household Survey numbers, where all of the below links (except the ADP one) comes from, are highly volatile on a month-to-month basis.
Some data series while I'm at it:
# Labor Force http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000?output_view=net_1mth
# Employed http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth
Last 3 months in THOUSANDS: -895, -185, -64
As usual they widely deviate from the headline non-farm payroll jobs numbers that come from the separate Establishment Survey
# Unemployed http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13000000?output_view=net_1mth
# Unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
# LFPR (Labor Force Participation rate) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
# LFPR Prime age (25-54): SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060
# U-6 unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13327709
# ADP PRIVATE Payrolls: Monthly, Seasonally Adjusted: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ADPMNUSNERSA
Rebl2
(17,750 posts)revised down probably in a few months
progree
(12,993 posts)And then there is an annual benchmark revision of the previous April thru March -- they announce a preliminary one in September and a final one in February (as part of the January report).
They revised a lot more than that -- 2022 was revised down by 29,000, 2023 down by 79,000, 2024 down by 553,000, and 2025 by 403,000.
Details in:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3615236
I don't know if they do a multi-year like that every time or not, I thought it would be just April 2024 thru March 2025.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,949 posts)On the whole, the job market is all but frozen, with little in the way of hiring or turnover. And for recent college graduates, its even worse.
The April jobs report looks good â but thereâs rot underneath.
— TheBlackPage (Woke, DEI forever against fascism) (@theblackpage.bsky.social) 2026-04-03T17:16:38.915Z
On the whole, the job market is all but frozen, with little in the way of hiring or turnover. And for recent college graduates, itâs even worse.
www.ms.now/opinion/jobs...
https://www.ms.now/opinion/jobs-report-reaction
?resize=560,695
Overall, the job market is all but frozen, with little in the way of hiring or turnover. And for recent college graduates, its even worse, which might help explain Trumps faltering support among this cohort. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, more than 40 percent of college graduates between the ages of 22 and 27 hold jobs that typically dont require a college degree. That high a share is usually seen only during economic downturns and their immediate aftermath, and is comparable to rates seen in the aftermath of the Great Recession.....
Economists are increasingly predicting stagflation a period of low growth and high inflation for the U.S. No surprise, consumer sentiment is all but in the toilet, with the University of Michigans consumer sentiment survey at near-record lows and huge numbers of Americans say they believe the country is heading in the wrong direction.....
At the same time, the extreme corruption of the Trump administration is also giving companies a license to raise prices and otherwise treat their customers like chumps without a choice. The gutting of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has left Americans with nowhere to turn when a credit card issuer or bank does them wrong. The de facto refusal to enforce antitrust statutes will almost certainly raise costs for Americans as well.
As Ive pointed out before, Trumps economy in many ways resembles to a multi-level marketing scheme. The only people making out here are the wealthiest of the wealthy, who are benefitting from tax cuts, while Trump performs his lifelong serial con bait and switch on the rest of us. This months job numbers are almost certainly offering more of the same they look good on first glance, but dig beneath the surface, and the rot quickly becomes apparent.
progree
(12,993 posts)1. "Yes, the April jobs report released Friday "
It was the March jobs report. (Yes, a trivial error)
2. The graph is labelled "on private nonfarm payrolls"
No, that graph and that 178,000 jobs number is all nonfarm payrolls, not private nonfarm payrolls --
see https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143643223#post47 above for the numbers and links. Where CNBC made the same mistake (first pointed out by Wiz Imp) Yes, it's not a big difference.
3. "But over the last six months, job growth has averaged just 89,000 per month weak sauce by any measure. "
It's not an average 89,000 jobs per month, it's 89,000 total over the 6 months, which is 14,833/month average. Again #47 above has the numbers and the links
4. "And a large part of the reason the overall unemployment rate fell to 4.3% is because 400,000 people exited the workforce entirely."
That's true. I just want to mention here is what's even worse is that the labor force fell by 1,408,000 over the past 3 months -- yes an astonishing 1.4 million over 3 months. I mention that in https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143643223#post47 above
Skittles
(171,729 posts)look closer and you'll see the rot