Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,876 posts)
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 08:31 AM 11 hrs ago

U.S. payrolls rose by 178,000 in March, more than expected; unemployment at 4.3%

Source: CNBC

Published Fri, Apr 3 2026 8:30 AM EDT Updated 5 Min Ago


The U.S. labor market bounced back in March, with job creation much stronger than expected though the broader picture of a slow-growth labor market held intact.

Nonfarm payrolls rose a seasonally adjusted 178,000 during the month, a reversal from the 133,000 decline in February and better than the Dow Jones consensus estimate for 59,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday. February’s number was revised down by 41,000 while January was revised up by 34,000 to 160,000, putting the three-month average around 68,000.

The unemployment rate edged lower to 4.3%, though that was largely from a sharp reduction in the labor force.



“The bottom line is March was somewhat encouraging, but it’s been a rocky year for the labor market with almost no hiring since last April,” said Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union. “The March data will keep the Federal Reserve on hold, but no one is declaring victory yet. It’s likely to be a tough spring for job seekers.”

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/03/jobs-report-march-2026-.html



From the source -




BLS-Labor Statistics
@BLS_gov
Payroll employment increases by 178,000 in March; unemployment rate changes little at 4.3% https://bls.gov/news.release/e
mpsit.nr0.htm
#JobsReport #BLSdata
8:31 AM · Apr 3, 2026



Stay tuned for DU's dogged analysts for the deep dives and TGIF!


Article updated.

Previous article -

Published Fri, Apr 3 2026 8:30 AM EDT Updated 1 Min Ago


The U.S. labor market bounced back in March, with job creation much stronger than expected though the broader picture of a slow-growth labor market held intact.

Nonfarm payrolls rose a seasonally adjusted 178,000 during the month, a reversal from the 133,000 decline in February and better than the Dow Jones consensus estimate for 59,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday. February's number was revised down by 41,000 while January was revised up by 34,000 to 160,000, putting the three-month average around 68,000.

With job creation higher, the unemployment rate edged lower to 4.3%.

As has been the case, health care was responsible for much of the growth, with the sector adding 76,000. A strike at health-care provider Kaiser Permanente in February took 31,000 off that month's total and has since been settled.


This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.



Original article -

Published Fri, Apr 3 2026 8:30 AM EDT


Nonfarm payrolls were expected to increase by 59,000 in March, with the unemployment rate holding at 4.4%, according to the Dow Jones consensus estimate.

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. payrolls rose by 178,000 in March, more than expected; unemployment at 4.3% (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago OP
The revisions coming for this number will hopefully reflect some sort of reality. NoMoreRepugs 11 hrs ago #1
I'm not hoping for bad jobs reports. Johnny2X2X 6 hrs ago #44
The entire 2025 year had 180k+- I find this number to be ludicrous. NoMoreRepugs 3 hrs ago #50
Actually, 116k total in 2025 (9.7k/mo average), thanks to downward revisions progree 59 min ago #56
That was revised down. Johnny2X2X 45 min ago #57
(revised title) It was revised down, yes, but to 116k - which is their very latest progree 34 min ago #60
116, 125, 180k - ANEMIC numbers that kept getting revised down. NoMoreRepugs 15 min ago #61
Yes, they are all catastrophically horrible numbers, being that they are totals for AN ENTIRE YEAR. /nt progree 11 min ago #62
do not trust anything from the BLS lapfog_1 10 hrs ago #2
100% false. BLS is comprised of career civil servants. Wiz Imp 10 hrs ago #10
I don't believe these "statistics" at all. tRUMP has polluted their data wolfie001 9 hrs ago #32
And you would be wrong. See post 12 Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #40
You read what the former head of the BLS said? She didn't seem to be so gung-ho wolfie001 1 hr ago #53
I don't believe these numbers at all. OrlandoDem2 10 hrs ago #3
Lies! For fools to believe. sunflowerseed 10 hrs ago #4
Yeah f'ing right newdeal2 10 hrs ago #5
Rebound from cold February 50% of the country freezeout bucolic_frolic 10 hrs ago #6
I wonder how these numbers jibe with independent assessments johnnyplankton 10 hrs ago #7
Most any day in the "news" they report lay-offs in the tens-of-thousands. Hmmm. twodogsbarking 10 hrs ago #8
Would you care to share those reports of layoffs in the tens of thousands? Wiz Imp 10 hrs ago #13
Perhaps I exagerated. twodogsbarking 10 hrs ago #14
Unfortunately, there's a paywall on that article. Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #20
Business Insider. No paywall for me. twodogsbarking 9 hrs ago #24
I get this message: This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #26
I can bypass many. My son added something to my computer. twodogsbarking 9 hrs ago #30
Here's the msn no-paywall republication of it (at least part of it, omitting the actual breakdown of companies) - BumRushDaShow 9 hrs ago #36
Thanks. As expected, these layoff announcements are not inconsistent with the BLS data. Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #41
Let's add Oracle... ultralite001 5 hrs ago #49
Oracle just did a massive one globally newdeal2 10 hrs ago #15
Keep in mind that Oracle's layoffs occurred after the reference period in March Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #19
You asked to name some and I did newdeal2 9 hrs ago #27
And I explained how the jobs data just released are not inconsistent with those layoff announcements. Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #28
Congrats on 10k posts. twodogsbarking 10 hrs ago #16
Thank you! Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #17
UPS, Amazon are 10,000+ ForgoTheConsequence 9 hrs ago #18
UPS announced layoffs planned for the entire year. I could not find any numbers Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #23
Oracle- 30,000. Henry203 9 hrs ago #39
Almost no one is hiring. AllyCat 10 hrs ago #9
I call bullshit choie 10 hrs ago #11
For those who are so sure these numbers are fake, then why would the administration Wiz Imp 10 hrs ago #12
Most seem to forget that with warmer temps lawn care, landscaping companies Bengus81 9 hrs ago #22
The numbers are seasonally adjusted, so they account and adjust for normal seasonal fluctuations progree 7 hrs ago #43
"a drop of 133,000 jobs in February? And February's number was even revised downward significantly." BumRushDaShow 9 hrs ago #29
From BLS news release Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #34
I had never noticed the mislabeling of the CNBC graphs before, OMG! Here's both sets of numbers, and ADP progree 6 hrs ago #47
This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles 1 hr ago #54
... ruet 9 hrs ago #21
Oracle fired 30K by email a couple days ago - TBF 9 hrs ago #25
Keep in mind, that most of these layoff announcements are global numbers. Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #31
Good point, ty. nt TBF 9 hrs ago #38
How are we supposed to believe any numbers coming out of this administration, give wrong numbers and you get fired. Walleye 9 hrs ago #33
Total BS. The career statisticians who produce the numbers at BLS have not been fired. Not a single one of them. Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #35
I still don't believe anything they say in this administration Walleye 9 hrs ago #37
🙄🤯 Wiz Imp 8 hrs ago #42
Let me guess... the heavy lifter here is "healthcare", hmm? Nursing homes and the like, right? Scott Alan Swaggerty 6 hrs ago #45
There are government jobs available. You must be willing to work nights and week-ends and twodogsbarking 6 hrs ago #46
Labor Force dropped 396,000 in March, and 1,408,000 in the last 3 months. progree 5 hrs ago #48
Will be Rebl2 2 hrs ago #51
Every month they revise the previous 2 months progree 43 min ago #58
MS NOW-The April jobs report looks good -- but there's rot underneath LetMyPeopleVote 2 hrs ago #52
Quite a few mistakes in this media opinion piece as often happens, though one key number was a LOT worse than it said: progree 1 hr ago #55
that's true with any "good news" coming from Trump.2 Skittles 35 min ago #59

Johnny2X2X

(24,217 posts)
44. I'm not hoping for bad jobs reports.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 12:42 PM
6 hrs ago

This is the devastation of the working class. We’ve had a year of no jobs growth. This was nothing more than an average report. But that’s welcome considering the jobs disaster that has been happening for the last year.

progree

(12,993 posts)
56. Actually, 116k total in 2025 (9.7k/mo average), thanks to downward revisions
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 06:38 PM
59 min ago

# Nonfarm Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
2024 175 206 228 64 78 87 53 9 155 33 134 237
2025 -48 42 67 108 13 -20 64 -70 76 -140 41 -17
2026 160 -133 178

progree

(12,993 posts)
60. (revised title) It was revised down, yes, but to 116k - which is their very latest
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:04 PM
34 min ago
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth

unless you know of a mistake in their latest numbers.

116k in all of 2025.

Where did you get your number?

ETA OOPS,, I just now noticed you were responding to nomorerepugs, not me, sorry. I changed the subject line too.

But 125k for all of 2025 is not the latest.



progree

(12,993 posts)
62. Yes, they are all catastrophically horrible numbers, being that they are totals for AN ENTIRE YEAR. /nt
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:27 PM
11 min ago

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
10. 100% false. BLS is comprised of career civil servants.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:23 AM
10 hrs ago

They have shed jobs since Trump came in. They have not added people.

wolfie001

(7,688 posts)
32. I don't believe these "statistics" at all. tRUMP has polluted their data
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:14 AM
9 hrs ago

https://www.vpm.org/npr-news/npr-news/2025-09-08/former-head-of-the-bureau-of-labor-statistics-discusses-future-of-u-s-labor-data
Interesting discussion with a former head of the BLS. She stated she has fears the data might be altered in the future. This conversation was in September.

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
40. And you would be wrong. See post 12
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:29 AM
9 hrs ago

Full disclosure: I am a former career statistician who worked very closely with BLS for 33 years at the state level. I remain acutely aware of what is going on at BLS.

wolfie001

(7,688 posts)
53. You read what the former head of the BLS said? She didn't seem to be so gung-ho
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 06:06 PM
1 hr ago
I guess we'll find out when and if they can amend these numbers down the road. I predict lies and obfuscation.

bucolic_frolic

(55,179 posts)
6. Rebound from cold February 50% of the country freezeout
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:05 AM
10 hrs ago

Plus these are the early-AI hires. Once they're on board, 5 times as many can be fired by August - the non-AI employees.

johnnyplankton

(637 posts)
7. I wonder how these numbers jibe with independent assessments
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:05 AM
10 hrs ago

My guess is that there's a pretty wide gap from the real numbers...

BumRushDaShow

(169,876 posts)
36. Here's the msn no-paywall republication of it (at least part of it, omitting the actual breakdown of companies) -
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:25 AM
9 hrs ago
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/companies-laying-off-staff-this-year-include-meta-amazon-and-oracle-see-the-list/ss-AA1TSFar

There are 23 companies listed plus one added that is restructuring.

ETA - the msn version has each company's data accessible via clicking on the image of the company in the image viewer and a recap of layoffs will appear below that viewer embed.

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
41. Thanks. As expected, these layoff announcements are not inconsistent with the BLS data.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:38 AM
9 hrs ago

Most are global announcements and cover planned layoffs for the entire year 2026. (Many are pretty small too). Those big numbers should be reflected in the BLS data when the layoffs actually happen.

ultralite001

(2,555 posts)
49. Let's add Oracle...
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 02:20 PM
5 hrs ago

"Oracle cutting thousands in latest layoff round as company continues to ramp AI spending"... (30k globally)

"Cutting 20,000 to 30,000 employees could lead to $8 billion to $10 billion in incremental free cash flow, TD Cowen analysts wrote in a January note.

Executives have said its AI investment will pay off, over time."

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/31/oracle-layoffs-ai-spending.html

newdeal2

(5,440 posts)
15. Oracle just did a massive one globally
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:37 AM
10 hrs ago

I'm sure Amazon and Meta will be doing more too.

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
19. Keep in mind that Oracle's layoffs occurred after the reference period in March
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:44 AM
9 hrs ago

so they wouldn't show up before April at the earliest. Add in that we don't know how many were in the US vs. internationally plus they didn't make clear if all the layoffs were even immediate, or if some won't happen until later.

Most major layoff announcements are for future months. They rarely happen all at once and some end up never happening.

newdeal2

(5,440 posts)
27. You asked to name some and I did
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:01 AM
9 hrs ago

I work in tech and follow the employee-led forums and yes there are massive layoffs happening all over.

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
28. And I explained how the jobs data just released are not inconsistent with those layoff announcements.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:03 AM
9 hrs ago

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
23. UPS announced layoffs planned for the entire year. I could not find any numbers
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:54 AM
9 hrs ago

on if layoffs already occurred. Amazon laid off 16,000 in January, which would have shown up in February data which currently show a 133,000 drop in jobs nationally - so the Amazon layoffs would seem to be accounted for in the numbers. Dow and Morgan Stanley layoff announcements were of global staff, so we have no idea how many are in the US. Plus Dow layoffs were not announced to be immediate but planned over the course of the year.

AllyCat

(18,854 posts)
9. Almost no one is hiring.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:21 AM
10 hrs ago

Reports of companies shedding 10s of thousands of jobs. This cannot be true.

choie

(6,908 posts)
11. I call bullshit
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:25 AM
10 hrs ago

And would that the media underscore the obvious, that the administration can’t be trusted to provide the real numbers. The media is still operating with a pre- trump mindset.

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
12. For those who are so sure these numbers are fake, then why would the administration
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:29 AM
10 hrs ago

show a drop of 133,000 jobs in February? And February's number was even revised downward significantly. If you thought about it for even 2 seconds, you'd realize your claims make no sense. The data from BLS continue to be legit (for now). It will be obvious if/when that stops being the case.

That doesn't mean the data are 100% accurate. They are based on a sample and are subject to statistical errors. We'll have a better idea of the accuracy after 1st quarter QCEW data is released in August or early September.

Bengus81

(10,173 posts)
22. Most seem to forget that with warmer temps lawn care, landscaping companies
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:48 AM
9 hrs ago

and the major fertilizing companies hire and hire. That's $hit load of people all over the US.

progree

(12,993 posts)
43. The numbers are seasonally adjusted, so they account and adjust for normal seasonal fluctuations
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 12:36 PM
7 hrs ago

Last edited Fri Apr 3, 2026, 02:09 PM - Edit history (1)

They don't account for unusual deviations, like February being colder than usual for February in much of the country, so that likely affects the January to February and February to March changes, even after seasonal adjustment.

BumRushDaShow

(169,876 posts)
29. "a drop of 133,000 jobs in February? And February's number was even revised downward significantly."
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:05 AM
9 hrs ago

From this for January (https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143614651)



to this for February, with about a 4,000 downward revision of January (https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143627754)



to now for March (with a 40,000+ downward revision of Feb. but a 30,000+ upward 2nd revision of Jan.) -

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
34. From BLS news release
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:22 AM
9 hrs ago
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for January was revised up by 34,000, from
+126,000 to +160,000, and the change for February was revised down by 41,000, from -92,000 to
-133,000.


By the way, the labels on those graphs are incorrect. They say "all employees on private nonfarm payrolls", but the numbers actually represent "total nonfarm payrolls" which includes government. (I understand they are coming from CNBC, but they are mislabeling them).

progree

(12,993 posts)
47. I had never noticed the mislabeling of the CNBC graphs before, OMG! Here's both sets of numbers, and ADP
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 01:30 PM
6 hrs ago

I also don't know why CNBC references FRED. The data series are available from the source of the numbers (BLS)

BELOW are monthly changes in THOUSANDS

# Nonfarm Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
2024 175 206 228 64 78 87 53 9 155 33 134 237
2025 -48 42 67 108 13 -20 64 -70 76 -140 41 -17
2026 160 -133 178

# Nonfarm PRIVATE Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth
2024 126 135 143 63 45 78 -8 -27 142 -4 116 212 < --PRIVATE
2025 -76 40 67 99 20 -45 65 -20 68 13 72 -7 < --PRIVATE
2026 180 -129 186 < --PRIVATE

The last 2 months of both data series are preliminary

Last 3 months:

all non-farm payroll: +68.3k/mo average,
private non-farm payroll: +79.0k/mo average
ADP private non-farm payroll: 46.3k/mo average (see below for the ADP source)


Not that I doubt that FRED echoed the BLS numbers correctly, though I don't have the FRED data series for this (I haven't looked yet, I have screaming tax deadlines)

As for alternate sources of similar information, I only know of the ADP report from the private payroll processor ADP:
# ADP PRIVATE Payrolls: Monthly, Seasonally Adjusted: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ADPMNUSNERSA
Last 6 months in THOUSANDS: +20, +74, +37, +11, +66, +62 < --PRIVATE

Yes, I'm using FRED numbers for the ADP ones because I don't know where to find the ones from ADP itself except for the last month,

The ADP processes payrolls for about 20% of the private sector workforce and estimate the other 80%.

Response to Wiz Imp (Reply #12)

TBF

(36,696 posts)
25. Oracle fired 30K by email a couple days ago -
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 09:57 AM
9 hrs ago

Meta has been terminating large amounts also. It is bad. They are using AI as a cover, but I think it's mostly because the economy is so terrible.

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
31. Keep in mind, that most of these layoff announcements are global numbers.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:10 AM
9 hrs ago

We don't know how many will be in the US. Regardless, they should show up in future months numbers since the only significant layoff I can find prior to the MArch reference period was 16,000 by Amazon in January, which seems to be reflected in the February numbers.

Walleye

(44,862 posts)
33. How are we supposed to believe any numbers coming out of this administration, give wrong numbers and you get fired.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:16 AM
9 hrs ago

Wiz Imp

(10,023 posts)
35. Total BS. The career statisticians who produce the numbers at BLS have not been fired. Not a single one of them.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 10:25 AM
9 hrs ago

If the administration were faking the numbers, they wouldn't be showing a huge drop of 133,000 jobs in February.

45. Let me guess... the heavy lifter here is "healthcare", hmm? Nursing homes and the like, right?
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 01:15 PM
6 hrs ago

Not interested in that kind of economy. Pass.

twodogsbarking

(18,809 posts)
46. There are government jobs available. You must be willing to work nights and week-ends and
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 01:21 PM
6 hrs ago

are willing to kill people you don't know.

progree

(12,993 posts)
48. Labor Force dropped 396,000 in March, and 1,408,000 in the last 3 months.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 02:07 PM
5 hrs ago

Meaning that one can have an employment drop and still have a steady or even decreasing unemployment rate.

Note that Household Survey numbers, where all of the below links (except the ADP one) comes from, are highly volatile on a month-to-month basis.

Some data series while I'm at it:


# Labor Force http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000?output_view=net_1mth

# Employed http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth

Last 3 months in THOUSANDS: -895, -185, -64
As usual they widely deviate from the headline non-farm payroll jobs numbers that come from the separate Establishment Survey

# Unemployed http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13000000?output_view=net_1mth

# Unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

# LFPR (Labor Force Participation rate) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

# LFPR Prime age (25-54): SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060

# U-6 unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13327709

# ADP PRIVATE Payrolls: Monthly, Seasonally Adjusted: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ADPMNUSNERSA

progree

(12,993 posts)
58. Every month they revise the previous 2 months
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 06:55 PM
43 min ago

And then there is an annual benchmark revision of the previous April thru March -- they announce a preliminary one in September and a final one in February (as part of the January report).

They revised a lot more than that -- 2022 was revised down by 29,000, 2023 down by 79,000, 2024 down by 553,000, and 2025 by 403,000.

Details in:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3615236

I don't know if they do a multi-year like that every time or not, I thought it would be just April 2024 thru March 2025.

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,949 posts)
52. MS NOW-The April jobs report looks good -- but there's rot underneath
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 05:20 PM
2 hrs ago

On the whole, the job market is all but frozen, with little in the way of hiring or turnover. And for recent college graduates, it’s even worse.

The April jobs report looks good — but there’s rot underneath.

On the whole, the job market is all but frozen, with little in the way of hiring or turnover. And for recent college graduates, it’s even worse.

www.ms.now/opinion/jobs...

TheBlackPage (Woke, DEI forever against fascism) (@theblackpage.bsky.social) 2026-04-03T17:16:38.915Z

https://www.ms.now/opinion/jobs-report-reaction

Yes, the April jobs report released Friday showed that the U.S. added 178,000 jobs last month, well above expectations. But over the last six months, job growth has averaged just 89,000 per month – weak sauce by any measure. As usual during Trump 2.0, the health care industry led the way with 76,000 jobs added (thanks in part to the resolution of a strike at Kaiser Permanente). Other industries lagged: while manufacturing employment grew 12,000, there are still 82,000 fewer such jobs than when Trump returned to the White House, And a large part of the reason the overall unemployment rate fell to 4.3% is because 400,000 people exited the workforce entirely.
?resize=560,695

Overall, the job market is all but frozen, with little in the way of hiring or turnover. And for recent college graduates, it’s even worse, which might help explain Trump’s faltering support among this cohort. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, more than 40 percent of college graduates between the ages of 22 and 27 hold jobs that typically don’t require a college degree. That high a share is usually seen only during economic downturns and their immediate aftermath, and is comparable to rates seen in the aftermath of the Great Recession.....

Economists are increasingly predicting stagflation – a period of low growth and high inflation – for the U.S. No surprise, consumer sentiment is all but in the toilet, with the University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment survey at near-record lows and huge numbers of Americans say they believe the country is heading in the wrong direction.....

At the same time, the extreme corruption of the Trump administration is also giving companies a license to raise prices and otherwise treat their customers like chumps without a choice. The gutting of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has left Americans with nowhere to turn when a credit card issuer or bank does them wrong. The de facto refusal to enforce antitrust statutes will almost certainly raise costs for Americans as well.

As I’ve pointed out before, Trump’s economy in many ways resembles to a multi-level marketing scheme. The only people making out here are the wealthiest of the wealthy, who are benefitting from tax cuts, while Trump performs his lifelong serial con bait and switch on the rest of us. This month’s job numbers are almost certainly offering more of the same – they look good on first glance, but dig beneath the surface, and the rot quickly becomes apparent.

progree

(12,993 posts)
55. Quite a few mistakes in this media opinion piece as often happens, though one key number was a LOT worse than it said:
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 06:32 PM
1 hr ago

1. "Yes, the April jobs report released Friday "

It was the March jobs report. (Yes, a trivial error)

2. The graph is labelled "on private nonfarm payrolls"

No, that graph and that 178,000 jobs number is all nonfarm payrolls, not private nonfarm payrolls --
see https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143643223#post47 above for the numbers and links. Where CNBC made the same mistake (first pointed out by Wiz Imp) Yes, it's not a big difference.

3. "But over the last six months, job growth has averaged just 89,000 per month – weak sauce by any measure. "

It's not an average 89,000 jobs per month, it's 89,000 total over the 6 months, which is 14,833/month average. Again #47 above has the numbers and the links

4. "And a large part of the reason the overall unemployment rate fell to 4.3% is because 400,000 people exited the workforce entirely."

That's true. I just want to mention here is what's even worse is that the labor force fell by 1,408,000 over the past 3 months -- yes an astonishing 1.4 million over 3 months. I mention that in https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143643223#post47 above

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. payrolls rose by 178...