Supreme Court strikes down Hawaii's 'vampire rule' for gun owners
Source: NBC News
June 25, 2026, 10:09 AM EDT / Updated June 25, 2026, 10:41 AM EDT
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a Hawaii gun restriction that limits when people can carry firearms on certain private properties open to the public, saying it infringes on the right to bear arms.
On a 6-3 vote, the court invalidated the measure that requires people with concealed carry permits to seek permission from a property owner before entering. It has been dubbed the "vampire rule" because, as in the classic novel "Dracula" and related tales, vampires can only enter someone's home if they are invited in.
The court, often supportive of gun rights, concluded that the provision violates the Constitution's Second Amendment. The courts conservatives were in the majority, while the three liberals dissented. The effect of this new rule is to impose severe restrictions on the daily activities of residents who have satisfied the states rigorous requirements for the issuance of a carry permit, conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the court.
This regime hobbles what the Second Amendment protects: the right of Americans to carry arms for self-defense as they go about their daily lives, he added. In dissent, liberal Justice Elena Kagan said she would have upheld the law because it is a modern-day analogue of colonial and founding era laws that similarly prohibited carrying firearms onto private property without the owners affirmative consent.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-strikes-hawaiis-vampire-rule-gun-owners-rcna261385
Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1046_nmio.pdf
Mme. Defarge
(9,122 posts)DEAD SCHOOL CHILDREN?!?
WTAF?!?
ret5hd
(22,707 posts)walkingman
(11,294 posts)that it has become a liability for citizens. On this 250th anniversary of our nation - instead of shooting off fireworks we need to re-examine what we really want to stand for.
The Grand Illuminist
(2,107 posts)nt
DrFunkenstein
(8,913 posts)The founders wanted the citizens to have access to muskets in case another British invasion came to our airports.
Who are we to argue the finer points of their timeless wisdom?
Bayard
(30,648 posts)And the way the Constitution has been warped into enablement.
Snackshack
(2,606 posts)...as if they are hairs, then there appears to be no reason that 'certain private property owners' cannot demand that people on their property carrying a firearm identify themselves as the potential threat are.
I thought about getting a CCW... once, until a firearms instructor told me this- "#1 if you need to hide the firearm you carry, you probably should not be carrying one in the 1st place and #2 by carrying a firearm you have increased your odds of being in a firefight by 100%."