Belgium Government Confirmed to Take Legal Action Against FIFA Suspending Falorin Balogun's Ban
Source: Yahoo! Sports
Sun, July 5, 2026 at 11:15 PM EDT·
Controversy around Falorin Baloguns revoked suspension is far from over. While the USMNT will now get Balogun against their historic round 16 match against Belgium, the European side has already launched a formal protest against Baloguns reinstatement. However, as per the recent updates, Belgium may not stop with a formal statement. Theyre planning to take the legal route against FIFA.
REPORT: Belgium has lawyered up to fight back against FIFAs decision to reinstate Balogun, according to a local reporter for the team, Brent Scher shared via X.
The controversy arose after FIFA reportedly applied its Article 27 rule that allows it to revoke a red card suspension if the case is not about match-fixing. Cristiano Ronaldo was helped when he played in the 2026 World Cups opening games following his red card against Ireland. FIFA applied the same to Balogun.
However, the controversy took a wrong turn after reports came out that Donald Trump called the FIFA head, and, later, Baloguns suspension was revoked. While its still a mystery about why FIFA revoked Folarin Baloguns suspension, Trump went on to thank FIFA for the same.
Read more: https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/belgium-government-confirmed-legal-action-031554834.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
Link to tweet
@BrentScher
·
Follow
REPORT: Belgium has lawyered up to fight back against FIFAs decision to reinstate Balogun, according to a local reporter for the team.
6:36 PM · Jul 5, 2026
REFERENCES
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143690170
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143690242
rampartd
(5,705 posts)a class action from all gamblers who bet against usa should have standing.
hlthe2b
(115,352 posts)that red card should have occurred to begin with, given it was well after the fact and based on still shots? Really?
But, now that Trump has corrupted the process, I'm on Belgium's side.
rampartd
(5,705 posts)from trump? my bullshit detector is set to "11".
Old Crank
(7,463 posts)There should have been some punishment for treading on an ankle with cleats.
After the fact is from VAR. Which is always after the fact.
The VAR official is supposed to view actions and then let the center know.
Where were the VAR officials for the match with France v Paraguay?
Where was the center for that match also. HAveing been a referee for over 20 years I;m at loath to comment too harshly on decisions made in real time from an angle you don;t see on TV and many cameras and the ability to have slow motion.
mcar
(46,658 posts)which is, apparently, quite unusual (generally they're shown several different views/angles).
The ref didn't even call a foul on the play. Perhaps you know, with your experience, but I'd also read that it was unusual for VAR to even weigh in on that kind of play.
Given the ridiculous officiating during France-Paraguay, it seems that FIFA has a real refereeing issue.
no_hypocrisy
(55,835 posts)Infantino is hardly impartial. He created out of air an otherwise non-existent FIFA "Peace Prize" just for Trump.
chicoescuela
(3,380 posts)Chasstev365
(8,445 posts)Raven123
(8,075 posts)I know nothing about soccer. Have heard many commentators disagree with the red card. Just cant trust the process with these guys.
Ponietz
(4,709 posts)But to blame the team and players is idiocy.
republianmushroom
(22,955 posts)maxsolomon
(39,500 posts)FIFA laughs.
spinbaby
(15,411 posts)Nepal was suspended for government interference just last week.
https://kathmandupost.com/football/2026/07/05/how-fifa-s-suspension-is-pushing-nepali-football-towards-a-lost-generation
riversedge
(82,407 posts)they might settle>>>>???? especially if MONEY is involved.
I really have no idea but to see Trump publicly in a law suit would be delightful IMHO.