Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

meegbear

(25,438 posts)
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 05:31 PM Jan 2013

Utah business owner fires two who backed Obama

Source: Sltrib.com

First, the owner of a smoothie bar in Vernal is charging liberals more for a cup of juice. Now, a Cedar City business owner who let two workers go because of Obamacare costs said he picked the pair in large part because of their support for President Obama. Terry Lee, owner of Terry Lee Forensics, showed his support for the Vernal smoothie bar’s practice of trying to recoup the costs it says are incurred because of liberal policies by posting in the comments section of a story about it in Thursday’s Salt Lake Tribune.

"Love it. We had to let two employees go to cover new Obongocare (sic) costs and increased taxes," Lee wrote. "Found two Obongo supporters and gave them the news yesterday. They wanted the idiot in the Whitehouse (sic), they reap the benefits."

Contacted by The Tribune Thursday, Lee said he picked the two employees in large part on the basis of their politics. "They were Obama supporters. We just knew they were," Lee said. "I implied that sort of tongue and cheek (in the comments section) but there were other issues, too. They were not top performers."

"Is your political affiliation protected?" he added, explaining that he thought what he did was not illegal. "I don’t believe it is, but I don’t know."

Read more: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/55650985-79/lee-utah-employees-costs.html.csp

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Utah business owner fires two who backed Obama (Original Post) meegbear Jan 2013 OP
is 'obongo' a misprint? Garion_55 Jan 2013 #1
No, it's not a misprint. It's a racist insult. kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #5
twice? i doubt it. arely staircase Jan 2013 #53
Not rare at all. malibea Jan 2013 #61
"cause" can be anything. American workers are not protected from legalized discrimination. patrice Jan 2013 #2
Is Utah a right to work state? TxDemChem Jan 2013 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author savebigbird Jan 2013 #51
If its a privately owned business they have a right to fire anyone for the politics. Somehow I southernyankeebelle Jan 2013 #57
Paging Gloria Allred. Scuba Jan 2013 #3
"Obongocare". secondvariety Jan 2013 #4
No he didn't google it. R Merm Jan 2013 #14
this man is a racist asshole Skittles Jan 2013 #6
But it's Utah Scootaloo Jan 2013 #33
Stupid isn't the word! malibea Jan 2013 #62
This just infuriates me Liberalagogo Jan 2013 #7
Perfectly legal Great Caesars Ghost Jan 2013 #54
Sweetheart Liberalagogo Jan 2013 #63
Then why say this????? Great Caesars Ghost Jan 2013 #66
Because it's true Liberalagogo Jan 2013 #67
Utah is a "right to work" state. U4ikLefty Jan 2013 #8
You mean "right to fire" state. defacto7 Jan 2013 #16
he can replace the two with a couple of his sister wives. Tutonic Jan 2013 #25
But aren't there laws prohibiting child labor? KansDem Jan 2013 #36
Just realized I scrolled too fast and missed this TxDemChem Jan 2013 #35
you mean an "at will" state melm00se Jan 2013 #43
"Right to Work" 1983law Jan 2013 #45
Right-to-work is a different issue. All states operate on an "at will" basis except contract workers Selatius Jan 2013 #70
They're probably not missing out ck4829 Jan 2013 #9
Somewhere in the resulting lawsuit lobodons Jan 2013 #10
There is no legal basis for a lawsuit. former9thward Jan 2013 #12
Texas Why Syzygy Jan 2013 #20
Good he must like paying for unemployment, guess this is better. Thinkingabout Jan 2013 #23
might depend on how he "just knew" they supported Obama Orangepeel Jan 2013 #41
and services as well Great Caesars Ghost Jan 2013 #56
THis is from the article savalez Jan 2013 #15
Mississippi????? dixiegrrrrl Jan 2013 #19
Thats why I left Cali for Oregon Great Caesars Ghost Jan 2013 #58
To each his own. savalez Jan 2013 #64
Don't get me wrong, CA is an awesome state. Great Caesars Ghost Jan 2013 #65
You just wanna fire people because of how they vote? savalez Jan 2013 #71
Precisely how does an employee's voting record interfere with how you run your business? LanternWaste Jan 2013 #73
Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #11
I know exactly what you mean.. DLine Jan 2013 #30
What a dumb ass because by his talking he is now open to a ... Botany Jan 2013 #13
They can sue, but they will not win. What do you think the cause of action would be? nt DeschutesRiver Jan 2013 #42
a violation of their employees' civil rights or privacy ..... Botany Jan 2013 #47
I didn't see any support in the facts so far for violations of civil rights or privacy - can you DeschutesRiver Jan 2013 #48
moot point Botany Jan 2013 #49
Well..... JoeyT Jan 2013 #69
Can they sue? Indyfan53 Jan 2013 #17
If this story is true at all, I suspect that the workers he fired are African American. yardwork Jan 2013 #18
I can't imagine him hiring Jacoby365 Jan 2013 #26
+1 same thought here lunasun Jan 2013 #27
It would be interesting to know the ex-employees' race(s). intheflow Jan 2013 #28
It's Utah. They almost certainly weren't black. They were probably *gasp* NOT GOOD MORMONS. LeftyMom Jan 2013 #37
These people Why Syzygy Jan 2013 #21
Their bullshit is out of control nt MrScorpio Jan 2013 #22
Does anybody else read these loonies quotes in the voice of some WV moonshiner? Socal31 Jan 2013 #24
Two contract employees.. Historic NY Jan 2013 #29
I read many of the comments on the article. UtahLib Jan 2013 #31
Karma, in.... ReRe Jan 2013 #32
if this can happen in Utah, next it will happen in the United States. olddad56 Jan 2013 #38
Will people learn from this event that stultusporcos Jan 2013 #39
+1000000000000000032 Great Caesars Ghost Jan 2013 #60
I'm not so sure that what he did is legal. Nine Jan 2013 #40
I am more surprised by folks who think that this is illegal or.......... socialist_n_TN Jan 2013 #44
this looks to be a faux story, for what reason I can't imagine cali Jan 2013 #46
Meaningless jberryhill Jan 2013 #55
There's a full own mormon revolt Politicub Jan 2013 #50
This piece of shit. liberalmuse Jan 2013 #52
Here is the honest truth Great Caesars Ghost Jan 2013 #59
I think someone is getting sued in the very bear futur..nt and-justice-for-all Jan 2013 #68
It may not be illegal for him to fire them, but it's also not illegal to drive his business into the Katorama Jan 2013 #72

malibea

(179 posts)
61. Not rare at all.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 10:17 PM
Jan 2013

This is par for the course for these assholes! There is nothing else these dirt bag bastards can do about the President being re-elected so they take it out on someone else-who can't do anything about it! What cowards and low-life these cretans are; I won't call them human beings!

Response to TxDemChem (Reply #34)

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
57. If its a privately owned business they have a right to fire anyone for the politics. Somehow I
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:42 PM
Jan 2013

think if your a democrat you lost that freedom of speech at work. Pretty sad. How sad they are afraid of free thought.

Skittles

(153,174 posts)
6. this man is a racist asshole
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 05:47 PM
Jan 2013

Last edited Fri Jan 18, 2013, 06:30 PM - Edit history (1)

who is probably too stupid to realize he just outed his racism

malibea

(179 posts)
62. Stupid isn't the word!
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 10:23 PM
Jan 2013

This idiot is beyond stupid; the word for him hasn't been invented yet! Let's just say shun him because he is definitely a fool! I think he feels bad, sad and desperately lost: GOOD!

 

Liberalagogo

(1,770 posts)
7. This just infuriates me
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 05:50 PM
Jan 2013

What if a left-leaning employer had done this during the Bush years or unimaginably, a Romney Presidency, to his right-wing employees? What would have been the reaction of the public and media?

This person's business should sued into the ground and the earth salted.

 

Liberalagogo

(1,770 posts)
63. Sweetheart
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 01:49 PM
Jan 2013

Did I say they were? Why not try responding to what I actually said, instead of something completely useless.

 

Liberalagogo

(1,770 posts)
67. Because it's true
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 06:34 PM
Jan 2013

If that gets your precious little nose out of joint, please whine elsewhere.

Welcome to ignore.

 

1983law

(213 posts)
45. "Right to Work"
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 03:33 PM
Jan 2013

Is a union-related matter and has little if nothing to do with the basis for terminating an employee.

Selatius

(20,441 posts)
70. Right-to-work is a different issue. All states operate on an "at will" basis except contract workers
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 08:40 AM
Jan 2013

"At will" applies to any situation where a worker who is working for an employer isn't in a union contract or isn't some contract worker.

All states in the Union operate on an "at will" basis to some degree. Differences in detail depend upon state codes.

"Right to work" laws are geared specifically to deal with labor unions. They're designed to create a freeloader problem on labor unions and thus to break them once freeloaders in a union shop outnumber union members.

ck4829

(35,079 posts)
9. They're probably not missing out
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 05:52 PM
Jan 2013

He gets caught committing some white collar crime or some gross error with the forensic work if that is what they actually do, I'll bet he'll try to pass the buck on down.

 

lobodons

(1,290 posts)
10. Somewhere in the resulting lawsuit
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 06:03 PM
Jan 2013

Somewhere in the resulting lawsuit filed by fired workers, I'd like to see listed the specifics of said losses which necessitated the firings.

former9thward

(32,064 posts)
12. There is no legal basis for a lawsuit.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 06:37 PM
Jan 2013

If you are not protected by a contracted you are an 'at will' employee and can be fired for any reason not legally protected. Your politics are not legally protected for employment.

Why Syzygy

(18,928 posts)
20. Texas
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:01 PM
Jan 2013

is a right to work state. You can be fired without cause, but his unemployment insurance will go up.
Their claims cannot be denied either.

Orangepeel

(13,933 posts)
41. might depend on how he "just knew" they supported Obama
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 12:44 PM
Jan 2013

I wonder how he "just knew" they supported Obama. Did they say so? Or do they look like someone who would support Obama?

savalez

(3,517 posts)
15. THis is from the article
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 07:04 PM
Jan 2013

But he readily acknowledged that the part-timers' political views weighed heavily in the decision. "Is your political affiliation protected?" he asked the Tribune rhetorically. "I don't believe it is, but I don't know."

Sadly, it isn't: According to AOL Jobs, only five states currently protect employees from being fired on the basis of their political beliefs — California, New York, Connecticut, Colorado and Mississippi.

However, the employees could potentially file a civil lawsuit against Lee for wrongful termination.

savalez

(3,517 posts)
71. You just wanna fire people because of how they vote?
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 05:59 PM
Jan 2013

I'm not sure what biz you are in but plenty of businesses are doing just fine here.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
73. Precisely how does an employee's voting record interfere with how you run your business?
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 06:54 PM
Jan 2013

Precisely how does an employee's voting record interfere with how you run your business?

Precisely how does a state law protecting employees from being fired for a political affiliation interfere with you running a business?

Response to meegbear (Original post)

DLine

(397 posts)
30. I know exactly what you mean..
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 12:57 AM
Jan 2013

The more absurd their claims, the more ignorant they are of politics. There are people I would actually call "friends" who thought as recently as the election that Obama was a muslim and born in kenya. It blows their mind. They usually stop arguing, but who knows if they actually believe me. Im just brainwashed by the "liberal media".

Botany

(70,552 posts)
13. What a dumb ass because by his talking he is now open to a ...
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 06:40 PM
Jan 2013

... real nice lawsuit. This little stunt will cost him $50,000 at
a minimum in bad p.r., legal fees, and God knows what else.

The ACLU will take this case and even if it (the firings) are upheld
in a local court they will appeal on up the food chain.

Botany

(70,552 posts)
47. a violation of their employees' civil rights or privacy .....
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 07:02 PM
Jan 2013

.... or maybe a just show cause suit. Depends on what court it winds up
in ...... a smart lawyer for the company might tell his client to just
settle up pdq because of court and legal fees along w/ the company will
get $$$$$$$ worth of bad p.r. too.

But then again i might be wrong on everything.

DeschutesRiver

(2,354 posts)
48. I didn't see any support in the facts so far for violations of civil rights or privacy - can you
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 07:28 PM
Jan 2013

point me to that information? I am on dialup, so I may have missed those facts.

Unless you've seen something I missed, the facts at present don't support anything other than a dismissal of such a lawsuit. In which case, if I were that company's attorney, I wouldn't have any basis for suggesting a settlement. And from what I'm seeing recently in that state, I don't think this will get them much local bad p.r. - there seem to be elements there that are okay with this kind of thinking.

I'm hoping not a majority, as I plan to visit the national parks in Utah this year, and am hoping that my mouth won't get me into any trouble if I run into this kind of thinking.

I don't like it either, but just because something ticks me off doesn't mean there is a legal remedy. Of course, it is still early in the game, and more facts may still come to light that would give rise to an actual reason why the fired employees could prevail in a lawsuit. I would hope so, because I'd like to see this employer in deep trouble. But just because I wish it so, doesn't make it so.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
69. Well.....
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 01:18 AM
Jan 2013
"They were Obama supporters. We just knew they were," Lee said.


He pretty much just admitted he fired someone because they either weren't white, they were a woman, or they were LGBT.

yardwork

(61,690 posts)
18. If this story is true at all, I suspect that the workers he fired are African American.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 07:53 PM
Jan 2013
"They were Obama supporters. We just knew they were," Lee said.

How did he "just know they were" Obama supporters? I suspect it's because they are black. The business owner already revealed his racism with the word he used instead of Obamacare.

intheflow

(28,494 posts)
28. It would be interesting to know the ex-employees' race(s).
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 12:35 AM
Jan 2013

I hadn't thought of that, it being Utah and all, but it certainly wouldn't surprise me if they weren't people of color and/or possibly women.

Socal31

(2,484 posts)
24. Does anybody else read these loonies quotes in the voice of some WV moonshiner?
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:35 PM
Jan 2013

What year do they think this is?

Although there is more than one town in rural Utah that you want to make sure you never drive through, and if you have to, make sure you have enough gas that you don't have to stop. A quick google on "The Lost Boys" will show you just how back wards they can be, to the point where local law enforcement is involved.

UtahLib

(3,179 posts)
31. I read many of the comments on the article.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 01:24 AM
Jan 2013

Thankfully, Terry Lee is being delivered a pretty good smack down. His business works with local law enforcement and attorneys to retrieve digital data from encrypted computer hard drives. One comment I found interesting is that if the agencies he works with are, directly or indirecty, receiving federal dollars, they may be prohibited from contracting with his business. Can't think of a better outcome for such a blatant and disgusting racist. Guess he won't be so proud of himself then.

 

stultusporcos

(327 posts)
39. Will people learn from this event that
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 06:38 AM
Jan 2013

Last edited Sat Jan 19, 2013, 07:13 AM - Edit history (1)

If Workers are not in Unions they are employed at the mercy of their employer

All Republicans and their supporters are vile and disgusting

This is soon going to spread all across the United States mainly in Red States and the GOP base will cheer

Will people finally figure out that the real enemy of America and freedom is the Republican party, their supporters and backers and start acting and treating them accordingly? No this is not a call for physical violence but for people to stop dealing with ALL Pubs on all levels mainly economically, they need to be punished for lack of a better for word by taking away what they worship most, money. Stop doing ALL business with red states, stop doing business with Pubs or those sympathetic to them, cut off ALL relationships with them at all levels of your life including those in your family, treat them like the scum they ALL truly are without exception.



Nine

(1,741 posts)
40. I'm not so sure that what he did is legal.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 12:33 PM
Jan 2013

Maybe there's no direct protection for political leanings (which, alone, shocks me), but aren't things protected which coincide or correlate with protected classes? I mean height may not be directly protected but you couldn't use it as a hiring/firing/promoting factor when it favors men of women and probably the non-disabled over some disabled people. Right? Political leanings are very correlated to race and, to a lesser extent, gender. I'm not a lawyer but I'd like to hear some DU lawyers weigh in on this.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
44. I am more surprised by folks who think that this is illegal or..........
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 01:31 PM
Jan 2013

somehow actionable in court. THIS IS A PROTECTED BEHAVIOR IN THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM! Anybody can sue anybody for anything, but they won't win.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
46. this looks to be a faux story, for what reason I can't imagine
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:07 PM
Jan 2013

there is no company by that name listed with the Utah Tax dept. evidently and the Facebook page says the business was established in January 2013.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Terry-Lee-Forensics/138194809586369

looks like the writer was punked.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
55. Meaningless
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:40 PM
Jan 2013

Why do you assume it was an incorporated entity, instead of a sole proprietorship?

The absence of a listing of such a "company" is insufficient evidence on which to draw a conclusion.

But, here's a really weird thing... it seems a car dealer's site in Indiana had, at one point, pages designed to give the impression that such a business exists:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UGQNMFhbxmQJ:terrylee.com/recovery.php+&cd=46&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

Yep... fake story:

http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?s=abfd8b8f9814c26525a0a054c6ef510d&p=1705082#post1705082

 
59. Here is the honest truth
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:51 PM
Jan 2013

In a "what goes around, comes around" dept., there are plenty of liberal progressives that do the very same thing. This is a form of seggregation. I admit, I do it too. As I stated in another post, when a person fills out forms for repair consideration, listing political affiliation is manditory. Keep em Seperated!

 

Katorama

(48 posts)
72. It may not be illegal for him to fire them, but it's also not illegal to drive his business into the
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 06:07 PM
Jan 2013

ground.

Same asshole who charged liberals more for their f***ng smoothies.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/55642295-79/burnett-liberals-smoothie-vernal.html.csp


He has a facebook page too.

http://www.ilovedrilling.com/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Utah business owner fires...