New Report Warns That Drones Could Be Used for Stalking, Voyeurism
Source: Slate
The sight of a drone in flight is likely to become a regular occurrence in the United States within the next few years. But the rise of unmanned technology could lead to new crimes like drone stalking and drone trespassing, lawmakers are being told.
A Congressional Research Service report published Wednesday, Integration of Drones Into Domestic Airspace: Selected Legal Issues, sets out the many contentious areas around unmanned aircraft. It cautions that in the future, as drones become more easily available to private citizens, we may see the technology used to commit various offences. This could mean neighbors using drones to infiltrate one anothers gardens as a means of harassment, or a voyeur using one strapped with a camera and microphone to photograph women and listen in on peoples conversations.
Traditional crimes such as stalking, harassment, voyeurism, and wiretapping may all be committed through the operation of a drone, the report says. As drones are further introduced into the national airspace, courts will have to work this new form of technology into their jurisprudence, and legislatures might amend these various statutes to expressly include crimes committed with a drone.
.......
These issues may seem hypothetical nowbut they are likely to come to the fore relatively soon. Last year, Congress tasked the FAA with safely integrating drones into the national airspace system by September 2015. Border security agencies are already using military-style drones like the Predator to conduct surveillance of border areas, and some law enforcement departments have used them, tooin one case, even to help arrest a farmer in North Dakota. Federal, state, and local agencies must obtain authorization from the FAA to fly large Predator-style drones, which can be used in designated airspace zones only. But regulations around small model-plane-size aircraft are more relaxed, and as they become more popular and affordable, legal conflicts seem inevitable.
Read more: http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/02/01/drones_could_be_used_for_stalking_voyeurism_says_congressional_research.html
KG
(28,751 posts)Cynicus Emeritus
(172 posts)for security.
*tyrants and others
KG
(28,751 posts)Cynicus Emeritus
(172 posts)Our fellow citizens are saying it and it is sad. The PTB are pushing Patriot Acts 1,2,3 etc while convincing the masses there is no need to fear an erosion of liberties, except by those who are doing something wrong like peacefully demonstrating.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Bedrooms will need to be enlarged to accommodate take off and landings.
Cynicus Emeritus
(172 posts)on your nude sunbathing daughter or wife does an armed citizen have the right to shoot them down or should they not? It might be from Google Streets.
That's the question that we all need answered. If a drone is trespassing do we have right to depose of such inanimate intruders who violate our right of privacy? Drones probably don't have an ID or do they knock on the door and then ID themselves.
I might buy an AR15 with a 100 round drum and dedicate it to that purpose. Am I wrong?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Though jamming will be quite effective too and you might get some resale out of the parts
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Maybe get a bunch of lead residue in the house for your childen to absorb.
Get more children innoculated to the sound of gunfire. Teach them to shoot at whatever is bothering them.
Teach them that guns solve problems, all kinds of problems.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)except you usually are serious.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)I tend not to use smilies
Ian David
(69,059 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Does Radio Shack take returns without a receipt?
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)is shot down on this NOVA special, Rise of the Drones.
http://video.pbs.org/video/2326108547/
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Current rules require 400ft AGL and continuously in the field of view of the operator. Few if any of the hobby ones can do that.
Jamming the data links (C&C and Video) is also trivial and they are in open bands so FCC support would be very limited if at all. Furthermore documenting it would be almost impossible.
SHARK's trespassing with them over shotgun events seem to get the expected reaction.
Cynicus Emeritus
(172 posts)This technology can be used for good and evil. It is concerning that it has given the PTB a belief that there are no rules. The only rules are the capabilities of the device. No need to declare war by Congress. No need to get warrants. We need to be very concerned where this is all headed when this is directed internally towards we the people. Few in Congress give any priority to protecting our civil rights. Protecting our security has and will be used as a strawman to take our rights.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Deep13
(39,154 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Javaman
(62,530 posts)Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Send a drone to the house first to case it.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)The satellites which can read a license plate can surely photograph nude backyard sunbathers.
Toy airplanes equipped with a camera (sort of drones)... are freely available and are far more affordable to an average stalker than a $5.8 million drone which requires a whole ground station and satellite communication to work properly.
Drones have been extremely effective in breaking Pakistani terror networks without risking American lives and this news is just a lot of drama to make people go against the strategy.
I don't like innocent civilians dying any more than an average person. However, a ground invasion and non-drone warfare kills a lot more innocents than the drones. In Iraq, with very conventional warfare, between 300K to 1 million innocent civilians died (depending upon whom you believe). The drones are no where close to reaching that number.
independentpiney
(1,510 posts)rocktivity
(44,576 posts)The "To Figure This Out, You Had To Do A Freaking STUDY?" Category
And if that wouldn't be enough fun, how would the drone know when it had the right suspect?
rocktivity
Zorro
(15,740 posts)Now that will be an emerging market.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Phoonzang
(2,899 posts)are we supposed to ban the purchase of anything with a propeller now?
randome
(34,845 posts)I swear, it's the word 'drone' that causes so much freaking out. It sounds so sinister, I bet if they were called something else, no one would care.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)...R/C toy out of our hands and make sure they're not there to film the abuses at protests, etc.
wishlist
(2,795 posts)I belong to two model airplane associations with hundreds of highly skilled members but only one member has anything resembling a drone. He practices with it at our flying fields to get more expertise to be able to use it in his forestry surveying work. Seems to me that both the technical expertise and expense to use it effectively would keep most stalkers from using it, but private investigators and paparazzi who are highly paid for photos would be most likely to take advantage of the opportunity.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)It's just a question of who will be stalking and voyeuring at the controls.
If it's our own government ... well ... it's not fascism when WE do it!