Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 03:05 PM Feb 2013

Push to overturn Voting Rights Act tied to GOP voter suppression efforts

Source: MSNBC

The Washington D.C. lawyer representing the Alabama county that wants to strike down the heart of the most effective civil-rights law in history specialize in cases aimed at making voting harder for minorities.

William Consovoy—the lead attorney on the case—also last year argued on behalf of Republican officials in Florida and Ohio, who in both cases were seeking to significantly reduce the days allotted for early voting, which blacks take advantage of more than whites. Consovoy, a former clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas, is a partner at Wiley Rein, a Washington, D.C., law firm that bills itself as the best in the country for election law.

The Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments in Shelby County v. Holder Wednesday. And the involvement of Consovoy and Wiley Rein in the case, which challenges the constitutionality of a key part of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), underlines the extent to which it’s a product of the broader partisan voter suppression campaign pushed by Republicans last year in a failed attempt to defeat President Obama.

In 2012, Ohio’s Republican Secretary of State Jon Husted caused an outcry when he ended early voting in the three days before Election Day for everyone except members of the military. The change would have made it harder for hundreds of thousands of Ohioans—disproportionately African-Americans—to vote. As Rachel Maddow and MSNBC.com noted at the time, Husted brought in Consovoy to defend the move in court, after it was challenged by the Obama campaign. Ultimately, the court required that the early voting days be restored.

Read more: http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/02/25/push-to-overturn-voting-rights-act-tied-to-gop-voter-suppression-efforts

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Push to overturn Voting Rights Act tied to GOP voter suppression efforts (Original Post) onehandle Feb 2013 OP
Just another reason why Republicans are scum sakabatou Feb 2013 #1
+1,000 freshwest Feb 2013 #8
Of course it is. drm604 Feb 2013 #2
They don't quit. They really want to destroy our democracy. The Wielding Truth Feb 2013 #3
If I remember correctly the part of the law they are challenging Drale Feb 2013 #4
I dont think that will help. I believe the SCOTUS will rule that it's unconstitutional rhett o rick Feb 2013 #6
I think that they will kill it because it doesn't apply evenly. annabanana Feb 2013 #7
I would love that to be true, but as best I can read there is nothing in rhett o rick Feb 2013 #15
Unless it's Marijuana Politicalboi Feb 2013 #16
What does MaryJane have to do with voting laws. rhett o rick Feb 2013 #17
So when whites enventually become the minority ...then what? Dumb asses! L0oniX Feb 2013 #5
sssshhhh... Don't remind them. n/t TygrBright Feb 2013 #12
Michigan is being run like a dictatorship and a blue print Iliyah Feb 2013 #9
Democrats cherish the right to vote .... SFnomad Feb 2013 #10
"States rights" is code for "allowing discrimination". Dawson Leery Feb 2013 #11
Jim Crow by any other name . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #13
I AM SHOCKED SHOCKED to find that gambling is going on here. iandhr Feb 2013 #14
"Specialize in cases aimed at making voting harder for minorities." Posteritatis Feb 2013 #18
In other news, water is wet. blkmusclmachine Feb 2013 #19

Drale

(7,932 posts)
4. If I remember correctly the part of the law they are challenging
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 03:49 PM
Feb 2013

says that certain states (I don't remember which ones) have to get any voting changes approved by the Federal Government because of their history of racism. Theres an easy way to fix that if ruled unconstitutional make all states run their election laws by the Feds first.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
6. I dont think that will help. I believe the SCOTUS will rule that it's unconstitutional
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 04:05 PM
Feb 2013

for the federal government to interfere with states voting laws.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
7. I think that they will kill it because it doesn't apply evenly.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 04:07 PM
Feb 2013

I think it would have a better chance if it was applied equally across the country.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
15. I would love that to be true, but as best I can read there is nothing in
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 07:59 PM
Feb 2013

the Constitution that permits the federal government to impose specific voting requirements on states. They have gotten around it so far because the federal government argued that it was necessary for them to put specific laws onto states in order to advance integration. I dont think it was ever challenged to the SCOTUS. I think they will rule 5 -4 against the law.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
17. What does MaryJane have to do with voting laws.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 08:17 PM
Feb 2013

Oh wait. I get it. Is this Cheech Marin? If it is, "Dave's not here"

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
9. Michigan is being run like a dictatorship and a blue print
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 04:17 PM
Feb 2013

for the rest of the country via GOPs. Sound a lot like WW2 huh?

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
13. Jim Crow by any other name . . .
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 07:40 PM
Feb 2013

Jim Crow by any other name is still narrow-minded, racist and fundamentally unconstitutional Jim Crow. The Conservative Movement is signing its own death warrant with this kind of crap. Despite any temporary wins they may achieve with these cowardly efforts to suppress minority voting, they will lose, and lose big, in the end.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
18. "Specialize in cases aimed at making voting harder for minorities."
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 09:29 PM
Feb 2013

Just roll that phrase around in your heads for awhile.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Push to overturn Voting R...