Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 04:21 PM Feb 2013

Sheriff: Suspect in fatal shooting of California police officers had body armor, 3 guns.

Source: Associated Press

Sheriff: Suspect in fatal shooting of California police officers had body armor, 3 guns.
Article by: MARTHA MENDOZA and JASON DEAREN , Associated Press
Updated: February 27, 2013 - 2:10

SANTA CRUZ, Calif. - Sheriff's officials say the suspect in the killing of two California police detectives had body armor and three guns.

Santa Cruz County Sheriff Phil Wowak said Wednesday that the body armor and guns were found on 35-year-old Jeremy Goulet after he was shot and killed by authorities.

Authorities say Goulet shot and killed Sgt. Loran Butch Baker and Detective Elizabeth Butler on Tuesday afternoon at the doorstep of Goulet's home.

The detectives wanted to question him regarding a report that he had made inappropriate sexual advances toward a co-worker.


Read more: http://www.startribune.com/nation/193551391.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sheriff: Suspect in fatal shooting of California police officers had body armor, 3 guns. (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2013 OP
Hey, other than being a convicted Peeping Tom he was a law abiding citizen. bluedigger Feb 2013 #1
if you ignore the 2 years in jail bossy22 Feb 2013 #8
Not the first time I've been told that. bluedigger Feb 2013 #9
Another poster child for gun control voted off the planet. Remmah2 Feb 2013 #2
It's not a moon suit. Think about it. n/t eggplant Feb 2013 #3
Sometimes Remmah2 Feb 2013 #5
This might answer your question RexDart Feb 2013 #6
He stole 2 of the guns and the body armor from the 2 dead police officers. Paul E Ester Feb 2013 #4
Wait ... so it's an actual CRIME to make 'inappropriate sexual advances towards a coworker'? brett_jv Feb 2013 #7
No, it's a crime to commit a "misdemeanor sexual assault". bluedigger Feb 2013 #10
Given the guy's history and the way it escalated octothorpe Feb 2013 #11

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
1. Hey, other than being a convicted Peeping Tom he was a law abiding citizen.
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 04:29 PM
Feb 2013

He needed that stuff to protect his rights.

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
2. Another poster child for gun control voted off the planet.
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 04:55 PM
Feb 2013

If he had body armor how did they shoot him?

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
5. Sometimes
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 07:11 PM
Feb 2013

Sometimes the press reports it as body armor and it's a black cotton vest. LOL stupid media. Moon suit not necessary. Possibly anti-gravity boots.

RexDart

(188 posts)
6. This might answer your question
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 09:03 PM
Feb 2013
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews/ci_22680203/santa-cruz-shootout-caught-video

The correct answer is many, many times. The first 8-10 shots are Goulet's. From that point on it was all law enforcement. It's starting to sound like this was a suicide by cop run. I'm glad they took Goulet down hard, there is a Whole Foods right across the street from this and if he had gone that way in the car, gods know what might have happened. There are more links and info at the Sentinel web site. I'd link more, but I'm out the door to a community meet/memorial at Louden Nelson park.
 

Paul E Ester

(952 posts)
4. He stole 2 of the guns and the body armor from the 2 dead police officers.
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 06:22 PM
Feb 2013

Not only did he legally own guns, he apparently was a licensed pilot. Hard to believe a peeping tom carrying a gun was not convicted of a felony.

In Oregon:

"Goulet was charged with the felony crimes of attempted murder, unlawful use of a weapon and first-degree burglary for allegedly propping the stick into the window. He also faced misdemeanor charges of carrying a gun without a concealed weapons permit and invasion of privacy for peeping.

After a full day of deliberations Friday, the 12-person jury found Goulet not guilty of attempted murder and the other felonies, and guilty of the two misdemeanors.

Some jurors said they wanted to convict him of more but lacked the evidence to do so."

Because Oregon law doesn't consider peeping a sex offense, Goulet won't have to register as a sex offender.

http://blog.oregonlive.com/breakingnews/2008/05/jury_weighs_peeping_tom_case.html

brett_jv

(1,245 posts)
7. Wait ... so it's an actual CRIME to make 'inappropriate sexual advances towards a coworker'?
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 10:37 PM
Feb 2013

I'm not condoning it, I'm just saying I had no idea that the cops could show up at your door for pinching the secretary's bum or whatever.

I always thought it was the kind of thing that companies get sued for, so you could get fired and maybe sued yourself for doing it. No idea it's actually the kind of thing where a reporting of it makes the cops come.

On a related note, I'm glad they took this bastard down. Screw paying for trial and imprisonment and the 10 year wait to execute this f***er.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
10. No, it's a crime to commit a "misdemeanor sexual assault".
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 11:01 PM
Feb 2013

Pinching someone's bum would be battery at the least, I think.

octothorpe

(962 posts)
11. Given the guy's history and the way it escalated
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 02:08 PM
Feb 2013

I'm willing to bet it was more than a simple unwanted come on or comment.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sheriff: Suspect in fatal...