Republicans push to stop automatic U.S. spending cuts
Republicans push to stop automatic U.S. spending cuts
By Donna Smith
WASHINGTON | Thu Feb 2, 2012 1:02am EST
(Reuters) - Wide-ranging U.S. spending cuts set to kick in next year for domestic and military programs would be scrapped by a proposal that some top Republicans plan to outline on Thursday.
Senator John McCain has joined forces with assistant Senate Republican leader Jon Kyl and other party members to introduce legislation that would eliminate the first installment of $1.2 trillion in automatic spending reductions over a decade.
These cuts were at the center of a budget brawl between President Barack Obama and Republicans in Congress last year during a fight to increase the U.S. debt limit.
The new proposal by McCain, Kyl and four other Senate Republicans would spare the military and selected domestic programs of cuts set to go into effect in January 2013. The $127 billion in budget savings would be achieved, instead, by scaling back the federal workforce and freezing its pay.
More:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/02/us-usa-budget-cuts-idUSTRE8110DA20120202?rpc=401&feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&rpc=401
Historic NY
(37,453 posts)it just goes to show you they have no interest in stopping spending
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Let the GOP spend the next eight months fighting spending cuts they agreed to already.
Issue is closed until next session.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)Oh...you don't know this game ?
Kablooie
(18,641 posts)They aren't about balancing the budget.
They just want to kill programs that don't help the wealthy.
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)*Fixed your headline, Reuters.
msongs
(67,441 posts)TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)But Corporate Welfare is a close second, and the military industrial complex is a part of it.
The Wizard
(12,548 posts)How many law makers have off shore accounts getting filled by defense contractors?
Lasher
(27,638 posts)What they want to do is perpetuate our bloated military, on the backs of men and women who work for the federal government. That is corrupt.
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)We will continue our deficit reduction, thank you very much!
TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)Agreeing to automatic, across the board cuts that are proportional to the spending for each department only highlights the fact that the military bureaucracy accounts for more than half the budget, while things like the federal education initiatives you despise cost practically nothing. You give the Department of Education six pennies and you take two of them away, who cares? You give the Department of Defense six hundred billion, and you take away two hundred billion...HAH! NOW we're talking!
It also reminds everyone that Social Security and Medicare have separate funding systems, and remain untouched by this. So...what are you left with to cut from the non-military side? Bloated AGRICULTURE subsidies, for a start, almost exclusively from red states. And sure, you'd like to cut food stamps but you can't, because that's also part of the agribusiness welfare complex.
Big cuts to the bloated military are the other third rail of politics. Neither party would EVER agree to vote big cuts to the military through Congress. It would be political suicide. But now Obama gets to make deep (automatic) cuts to the military, and blame it on the Teahadist insurgents in the House for their inability to compromise. COULDN'T ASK FOR BETTER! Thanks!
cbrer
(1,831 posts)The GOP wants smaller government! Just ask one.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)DCKit
(18,541 posts)So much for being "fiscally conservative", eh?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)The party of fiscal irresponsibility and moral bankruptcy rides again.
sinkingfeeling
(51,474 posts)rocktivity
(44,577 posts)The members of Congresss included?
rocktivity
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tx4obama This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)also reported that Obama promised to veto such a bill. Several responded that they'll believe it when they see it. TX4Obama locked the other thread. Said it was a duplicate. Inasmuch as this thread doesn't even mention the threatened veto, then it is not the same thread.
surrealAmerican
(11,364 posts)... if you're just going to fight against them afterwards?
nanabugg
(2,198 posts)Clinton actually cut the Fed workforce while "putting people first." Bush, Reagan ( especially Reagan) grew the Feds.