Judge won't let Fort Hood suspect plead guilty
Source: AP
FORT HOOD, Texas (AP) A military judge says an Army psychiatrist cannot plead guilty to any charges in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage.
Maj. Nidal Hasan wanted to plead guilty to 13 counts of premeditated murder. But Army rules prohibit a judge from accepting a guilty plea to charges carrying the death penalty.
Hasan's attorneys still had asked the judge, Col. Tara Osborn, to let Hasan plead guilty to lesser charges of unpremeditated murder. He still would have gone to trial in May and faced a possible death sentence if the judge had allowed the plea.
But Osborn said Wednesday that Hasan will not be allowed to plead guilty even to the lesser charges.
Read more: http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/judge-wont-let-fort-hood-suspect-plead-guilty
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Sounds...weird.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)Have to have a trial. Keeps someone from forcing someone else to take the blame directly. At least that's how I read it as a compute guy.
pscot
(21,024 posts)They need the trial. These things have become rituals. It's a public spectacle.
Trunk Monkey
(950 posts)Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)If persons could plead guilty to offenses carrying the DP, then theoretically a person could be abused/threatened into it and the evidence buried with him. Forcing a trial on a not-guilty plea may be weird, but it does force the state to actually make a case before someone faces such a dire penalty.
Consider, for example, what could happen to a Manning-type case. A defendant put in solitary/deprived of contact, maybe charges threatened against friends....
Practically speaking, this measure is a good measure against prisoner and prosecutorial abuse.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Poor Manning....
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)We're going to spend an asinine amount of money to put this guy on trial for a crime he's willing to plead guilty to, just so we can kill him.
TexasTowelie
(112,347 posts)deciding whether Hasan has to shave his beard for the trial.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)well as dealing with nuisance lawsuits about his beard, etc?
reACTIONary
(5,771 posts)...but in civil jurisdictions, a not guilty plea is sometimes required in capital cases to ensure that guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt and with a moral certitude before the ultimate punishment is carried out.
Melon_Lord
(105 posts)Intellectually, he just needs to be taken out back, shot and buried in an unmarked grave.
There is no doubt as to guilt. 0.000000% chance that he did not do this.
Wasteful...
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)The judge has no discretion on the matter
era veteran
(4,069 posts)845. ART. 45. PLEAS OF THE ACCUSED
(a) If an accused after arraignment makes an irregular pleading, or after a plea of guilty sets up matter inconsistent with the plea, or if it appears that he has entered the plea of guilty improvidently or through lack of understanding of its meaning and effect, or if he fails or refuses to plead, a plea of not guilty shall be entered in the record, and the court shall proceed as though he had pleaded not guilty.
(b) A plea of guilty by the accused may not be received to any charge or specification alleging an offense for which the death penalty may be adjudged. With respect to any other charge or specification to which a plea of guilty has been made by the accused and accepted by the military judge or by a court-martial without a military judge, a finding of guilty of the charge or specification may, if permitted by regulations of the Secretary concurrence, be entered immediately whither vote. This finding shall constitute the finding of the court unless the plea of guilty is withdrawn prior to announcement of the sentence, in which event the proceedings shall continue as though the accused had pleaded not guilty.
846. ART. 46. OPPORTUNITY TO OBTAIN WITNESSES AND OTHER EVIDENCE
The trial counsel, the defense counsel, and the court-martial shall have equal opportunity to obtain witnesses and other evidence in accordance with such regulations as the President may prescribe. Process issued in court- martial cases to compel witnesses to appear and testify and to compel the production of other evidence shall be similar to that which courts of the Unites States having criminal jurisdiction may lawfully issue and shall run to any part of the United States, or the Territories, Commonwealths, and possessions.