Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,347 posts)
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 08:02 PM Mar 2013

Judge won't let Fort Hood suspect plead guilty

Source: AP

FORT HOOD, Texas (AP) — A military judge says an Army psychiatrist cannot plead guilty to any charges in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage.

Maj. Nidal Hasan wanted to plead guilty to 13 counts of premeditated murder. But Army rules prohibit a judge from accepting a guilty plea to charges carrying the death penalty.

Hasan's attorneys still had asked the judge, Col. Tara Osborn, to let Hasan plead guilty to lesser charges of unpremeditated murder. He still would have gone to trial in May and faced a possible death sentence if the judge had allowed the plea.

But Osborn said Wednesday that Hasan will not be allowed to plead guilty even to the lesser charges.

Read more: http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/judge-wont-let-fort-hood-suspect-plead-guilty

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge won't let Fort Hood suspect plead guilty (Original Post) TexasTowelie Mar 2013 OP
But if he IS found guilty, then they can kill him? dixiegrrrrl Mar 2013 #1
Can't have "the wrong person" plead guilty and die Paulie Mar 2013 #2
Guilt is not the issue pscot Mar 2013 #4
It's the Army it doesn't have to make sense NT Trunk Monkey Mar 2013 #10
Checks and balances Yo_Mama Mar 2013 #12
Good point..... dixiegrrrrl Mar 2013 #13
A great example of how the death penalty is a waste of money Hippo_Tron Mar 2013 #3
They've already spent an asinine amount of money TexasTowelie Mar 2013 #5
How much would it cost to house him for the rest of his life, as geek tragedy Mar 2013 #11
I'm not sure about a military trial... reACTIONary Mar 2013 #6
Emotionally, I understand the need to go through the dog and pony show... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #7
IIRC its black letter in the UCMJ ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #8
UCMJ, sucks btw era veteran Mar 2013 #9

Paulie

(8,462 posts)
2. Can't have "the wrong person" plead guilty and die
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 08:16 PM
Mar 2013

Have to have a trial. Keeps someone from forcing someone else to take the blame directly. At least that's how I read it as a compute guy.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
4. Guilt is not the issue
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 08:21 PM
Mar 2013

They need the trial. These things have become rituals. It's a public spectacle.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
12. Checks and balances
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 11:35 AM
Mar 2013

If persons could plead guilty to offenses carrying the DP, then theoretically a person could be abused/threatened into it and the evidence buried with him. Forcing a trial on a not-guilty plea may be weird, but it does force the state to actually make a case before someone faces such a dire penalty.

Consider, for example, what could happen to a Manning-type case. A defendant put in solitary/deprived of contact, maybe charges threatened against friends....

Practically speaking, this measure is a good measure against prisoner and prosecutorial abuse.

Hippo_Tron

(25,453 posts)
3. A great example of how the death penalty is a waste of money
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 08:17 PM
Mar 2013

We're going to spend an asinine amount of money to put this guy on trial for a crime he's willing to plead guilty to, just so we can kill him.

TexasTowelie

(112,347 posts)
5. They've already spent an asinine amount of money
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 08:22 PM
Mar 2013

deciding whether Hasan has to shave his beard for the trial.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. How much would it cost to house him for the rest of his life, as
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 01:45 PM
Mar 2013

well as dealing with nuisance lawsuits about his beard, etc?

reACTIONary

(5,771 posts)
6. I'm not sure about a military trial...
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 08:32 PM
Mar 2013

...but in civil jurisdictions, a not guilty plea is sometimes required in capital cases to ensure that guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt and with a moral certitude before the ultimate punishment is carried out.

 

Melon_Lord

(105 posts)
7. Emotionally, I understand the need to go through the dog and pony show...
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 08:42 PM
Mar 2013

Intellectually, he just needs to be taken out back, shot and buried in an unmarked grave.

There is no doubt as to guilt. 0.000000% chance that he did not do this.

Wasteful...

era veteran

(4,069 posts)
9. UCMJ, sucks btw
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 08:28 AM
Mar 2013

845. ART. 45. PLEAS OF THE ACCUSED

(a) If an accused after arraignment makes an irregular pleading, or after a plea of guilty sets up matter inconsistent with the plea, or if it appears that he has entered the plea of guilty improvidently or through lack of understanding of its meaning and effect, or if he fails or refuses to plead, a plea of not guilty shall be entered in the record, and the court shall proceed as though he had pleaded not guilty.

(b) A plea of guilty by the accused may not be received to any charge or specification alleging an offense for which the death penalty may be adjudged. With respect to any other charge or specification to which a plea of guilty has been made by the accused and accepted by the military judge or by a court-martial without a military judge, a finding of guilty of the charge or specification may, if permitted by regulations of the Secretary concurrence, be entered immediately whither vote. This finding shall constitute the finding of the court unless the plea of guilty is withdrawn prior to announcement of the sentence, in which event the proceedings shall continue as though the accused had pleaded not guilty.

846. ART. 46. OPPORTUNITY TO OBTAIN WITNESSES AND OTHER EVIDENCE

The trial counsel, the defense counsel, and the court-martial shall have equal opportunity to obtain witnesses and other evidence in accordance with such regulations as the President may prescribe. Process issued in court- martial cases to compel witnesses to appear and testify and to compel the production of other evidence shall be similar to that which courts of the Unites States having criminal jurisdiction may lawfully issue and shall run to any part of the United States, or the Territories, Commonwealths, and possessions.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge won't let Fort Hood...