Susan G. Komen Foundation Maintains Apparent Partnership With Handgun Seller
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/03/susan-g-komen-planned-parenthood-handgun_n_1252448.htmlSusan G. Komen Foundation Maintains Apparent Partnership With Handgun Seller
WASHINGTON -- The Susan G. Komen Foundation may not want to have anything to do with Planned Parenthood, but it appears to have no problem associating itself with handguns.
Business Insider first reported Thursday that Komen, which has come under fire this week for cutting off its funding for Planned Parenthood in what appears to be a politically motivated move, has apparently maintained a partnership with a gun seller that offers a pink "Hope" handgun.
"Discount Gun Sales is proud to team up with the Susan B. Koman [sic] Foundation to offer the Walther P-22 Hope Edition in recognition of Breast Cancer Awareness Month. A portion of each P-22 Hope Edition will be donated to the Seattle Branch of the Susan G. Komen Foundation," reads the description on the gun seller's website. "The P-22 Hope Edition has an exclusive DuraCoat Pink slide in recognition of Breast Cancer Awareness month. Utilizing the same reliable controls and firing mechanism that has made the Walther P-22 America's top selling handgun, the Hope Edition will be a limited production pistol offered exclusively through Discount Gun Sales."
Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)TBF
(32,067 posts)Please be specific.
Badsam
(180 posts)Their decision against Planned Parenthood was idiotic and politically motivated but why is taking donations from any company bad if it furthers the cause of ending cancer. Guns are legal, and if a adult wants a pink gun that, in the end, helps fight cancer, what is the problem?
and your attitude sucks
That is exactly what I would expect you to say right down to the personal insult. So typical.
Lost-in-FL
(7,093 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 3, 2012, 06:34 PM - Edit history (1)
Bwahahahaha! Why a 'pro-life' organization would want to sell a gun (using the same bogus argument they used for their anti-choice fiasco). But the... I don't think you see the irony.
Beavker
(823 posts)So they picked the right wing to align with. Fine. I'll find another place to donate to help save lives.
I'd like to see more organizations get more involved anyway. SGK is becoming too big to fail if they can decimate woman's services that easily...if you know what I mean.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)The minimal amount of money that Komen might make from the sale of a hand gun is not going to significantly add to the research to fight breast cancer. The damage that the perception that Komen gives their imprimatur to a weapon will likely cost them more money than they might make from it.
Guns don't fight cancer - scientists do.
Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)To point out that selling a perfectly legal product so as to raise money to fight cancer is a good thing.
Any other questions?
Skwid
(86 posts)and effective means to defend themselves and their families against criminals. (I can't explain it, I just know they exist).
iverglas
(38,549 posts)Enjoy!
Skwid
(86 posts)Hang in there, Black Knight.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Next.
Skwid
(86 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)?
Skwid
(86 posts)I was replying to someone who -seemed- to suggest otherwise, in certain cases.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)yardwork
(61,650 posts)iverglas
(38,549 posts)The comment was that perfectly legal doesn't mean good, to which you replied:
Like abortion? Same-sex marriage in Massachusetts, NY, etc?
Interesting how you didn't say:
Like adultery? Slavery in the post-colonial United States?
Get it, folks?
Our new friend is trying to tell us that since legal same-sex marriage is a good thing, a charity devoted to women's well-being partnering with a manufacturer of things widely used to abuse, injure and kill women is a good thing!
Skwid
(86 posts)Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)Whether it's reproductive freedom, or the freedom to defend one's self.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Next.
iverglas
(38,549 posts)exploiting women and women's struggle for reproductive rights in the service of the gun militant agenda, among others. CHOICE!!
Women's reproductive choices really are no one else's business, since they affect no one else.
Access to firearms is a community's and society's business, since, too obviously, it affects everyone.
Acknowledgement of these distinctions is what distinguishes the left from the loonytarian, and people of goodwill from people of self-interest.
Access to firearms also women's business. Firearms homicides of women are committed by their present and former intimate partners more than by anyone else. Women are intimidated into remaining in abusive relationships by men with firearms. Women live in communities wracked by firearms violence. People who genuinely care about women do not get into bed with people whose sole aim is to sell more guns.
The decision of this Komen outfit to partner with a firearms manufacturer is just staggeringly bizarre. Except that it isn't. The right wing in its various outcroppings just tends to pal around with itself.
I've been reading up. (We don't have this Komen outfit in Canada, of course, but apparently there has been a recent partnership "in research, education, advocacy and awareness programs across borders" with our Breast Cancer Foundation.) Its corporate ties and its spending on fundraising and administration do not rank it high among charitable organizations.
TBF
(32,067 posts)It's grand to sell legal products to raise money to fight cancer in rich white republican women.
Is that what you meant to say?
De-funding PP only means the poor women of color (and some who may be white) will die from their breast cancer that will go undetected until it is way too late to save them.
I'm glad that makes you happy.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)and cancer for that matter.
let's not let any of the gun pushers let themselves feel like buying a instrument of killing are actually doing something charitable.
TBF
(32,067 posts)anything to do with endorsing weapons that cause death. Baffles the mind ...
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)maybe not so amazing, especially in light the past week.
now that I know about how they stopped the funding of embryonic cell research along with cutting off planned parenthood I have no use for them.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"selling a perfectly legal product so as to raise money to fight cancer is a good thing...."
"Any other questions?"
Like selling cigarettes to raise money to fight cancer?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...high-heeled shoes.
Firearms don't do that.
carla
(553 posts)a gun named Hope? Shooting is hardly an ally of breast cancer research except for knuckledraggers.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)crazylikafox
(2,758 posts)Kolesar
(31,182 posts)I was hoping this thread would be darker, but you made it fun
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)I know someone who used to work there. She called it a "scam factory."
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)could just shoot the tumors.
Critters2
(30,889 posts)IcyPeas
(21,893 posts)what was it the pro-life crowd were calling that doctor that was murdered? "Tiller the Baby Killer"....... pot calling the kettle black. Wonder if they used a pink gun?
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Ok, that's a song lyric by The The.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Bruce Wayne
(692 posts)But I detest breast cancer more. And the pink ones are really kind of cute.
Nolimit
(142 posts)I'd think the distinction of top selling handgun probably goes to the Glock line. They make Pink everything for breast cancer awareness; my contact lens case is pink. As far as partnerships go, I can't see many people getting worked up about this. Maybe if it was a Pink Mossberg or a Pink AR. A .22 caliber pistol, while not a toy, is just not as scary.
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)Discount Gun Sales is selling a completely legal .22 caliber pistol and donating a portion of the proceeds to the Komen foundation.
http://www.discountgunsales.com/walther-p-22-hope-edition-34-pr-5575.html
Travelman
(708 posts)is that those guns will get up all by themselves and go out and start shooting people. My GOD! They're going to go out all by themselves and start shooting *gasp* children!!!!
[img][/img]
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)I fail to see the problem.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)had to go back and read the whole thing to get the idea. I agree with you about pink. OD green is as fancy as I would get.
carla
(553 posts)their slogan is "Life, Love and Hope'...how does a handgun provide any of these? Happiness is NOT a warm gun...shoot, shoot.
Gun dealers are killers. No denying it. And stop all the BS about self defense...you know more folks die from their own guns than at the hands of robbers. The new Komen slogan should read, "Death, Hate and Despair". Seeing anything yet?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)that is not actually true, but has been a talking point since the 70s.
guns are machines, machines do not provide anything.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)Are you not jaded by such a trite red herring, a rather poor approximation of "Guns don't kill people; people kill people!"? I don't even know why gun advocates continue to trot it out. What's the point?
Clearly, people must choose to use guns murderously. However, you cannot erase the fact that guns--specifically, handguns--are made for the express purpose of killing another human being.
Please, consider that fact the next time you proffer that offensive palliative. Instead, why shouldn't gun advocates encourage safe and responsible gun ownership? This would go a lot further toward a more realistic perspective of guns.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)Including me. And, all but my father range from liberal to very, very liberal. I can tell you that I had a very rigorous class and test to qualify for my CCW, including knowing how to safely use the pistol, making a certain score after shooting 150 rds. in a row, and knowing gun laws and responsibilities. As I said, we also had a written test. This was a 20-hour course, taught by attorneys, LEOs, etal.
Handguns ARE meant to kill people. Some people shouldn't own a gun, because they are idiots with them. I also don't think some people should own ATVs for the same reason. These two groups tend to overlap.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)My dad taught me to respect all guns. He taught me and my two sisters how to handle his 22, and his double barrel shotgun. I had a bruise the size of a cantaloupe on my shoulder after I fired his shotgun, but knocking cans off a fence rail with the 22 was quite exhilarating. And, I was quite clear from a very early age that guns are not toys.
I have a guy friend who's taking me deer hunting when I get back to the Ozarks. He's told me he 'reckons' I'm the only girl he's ever known to express an interest in deer hunting. I'm counting on him to help me acquire a good general purpose rifle. I told him I 'reckon' that if I want my favorite lean protein on my table, I'd best learn how to hunt.
(If I were staying in Houston, I'd consider a CCW. I was 6 points shy of expert with both a pistol and an M-16 in high school ROTC. I don't fear guns, just some of the idiots who wield them...)
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)I was not raised as an animist, and I am not so sure it is a red herring. It is simply a literal statement of fact. Call it concrete thinking if you wish, maybe it is. If you think it is trite, so be it. The best answer to your question would be something like why do gun control advocates string together logical fallacies and emotional ranting to argue for what they define as rational and sane. You may be too young to remember, but some arguments really amounted to the trigger pulling the finger back then.
In general they are designed with that idea, but some specific guns are not.
I did not mean that to be offensive, simply literal thinking. It is an INTP thing, I can't help it. I actually thought we do encourage safe and responsible gun ownership. There are certainly people who should not have guns. We can do a better job of it, but have you seen evidence of not doing so?
Reading some of your other posts leaves me perplexed. I am guessing that you are more offended by what you described as a trite red herring (and an inappropriate color for a gun) than guns in general? I agree with you on pink guns (making them works of art with engraving and inlay is one thing, but making them look like toys is ummm). What is really hideous is the lavender SMG I saw at a local class three dealer. Still there after three years. The guy finally took it off display and leaves it in the vault because too many people mistake it for a paint ball gun.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)Perplexed is an apt description of my reaction to your post. So, in that, we are on the same page.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)A major US breast cancer charity has reversed a decision to cut funding to women's group Planned Parenthood, after the move provoked a furious outcry.
Susan G Komen apologised for its move to withdraw support for the prominent US reproductive health organisation.
Critics said the decision to cut breast-screening grants was prompted by pressure from anti-abortion activists.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-16875958
stockholmer
(3,751 posts)WASHINGTON -- The Susan G. Komen Foundation has responded to reports Friday that it is affiliated with a handgun manufacturer selling a pink gun designed to promote breast cancer awareness, saying that it does not have a partnership with the manufacturer and has not received donations from it
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/03/susan-g-komen-planned-parenthood-handgun_n_1252448.html
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)I've seen pink guns at gun shows displayed with a pink placard and the Komen name. I want a statement from Walther and other manufacturers.
Googling.
stockholmer
(3,751 posts)have pulled the gun from their site. A statement from Walther would be of help, agreed.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)http://www.discountgunsales.com/walther-p-22-hope-edition-34-pr-5575.html
stockholmer
(3,751 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)But in stainless, not in pink, never in pink. Why pink guns exist is rather disgusting to me.*** It is a very nice lttle plinker, and perfect for wearing when I run. I also own another a .9mm pistol and a .20 shotgun. I have a CCW permit. I see nothing wrong with educated, safe, and responsible gun ownership.
However, I find the fact that Komen pulled PP funding over "abortion providing" and $12 million from cancer research because of stem cells usage, yet are still partnered WITH GUNMAKERS, beyond hypocritical and extremely immoral. It is pinkwashing gone mad.
***Handguns are defensive weapons meant to protect you and to KILL someone else, and I despise the whole pink gun thing. Weapons shouldn't be made to look cute or look like toys. They are meant to kill, and it is our duty to never, ever forget that.
Muskypundit
(717 posts)There is nothing cute about a gun. They are meant to kill and cause harm.
primavera
(5,191 posts)That happens so rarely, how refreshing!
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)dballance
(5,756 posts)You have got to be kidding me. The "Hope" edition of a handgun. What are they hoping for? A few more gun deaths? A women's health charity that partners with a hand gun manufacturer because it puts a pink top on the gun? A gun. Really, a gun. Did someone forget that hand guns are really people killing weapons? They are not for hunting, they are for killing people.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)people do hunt with them. Some are designed for that as well as target shooting. When I was a kid, I supplemented my mom's food stamps with small game I hunted with a revolver my oldest brother bought in a Hamburg (then West Germany) gun store.
Think a pink pistol is stupid, wait until you come across a lavender sub-machine gun.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)So it seems.
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)fuck this foundation...give directly to Planned Parenthood!
lanlady
(7,134 posts)And of these, most are handguns.
But statistics be damned. A pink handgun is just sooooo precious.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)If they can raise more money by sponsoring a handgun, more power to them.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)It certainly doesn't serve their core mission, but they probably aren't the only NGO whose associations can be hard to understand, even bizarre.
I have a problem with the SGK foundation for the reasons that have been discussed here over the last few days. That's sufficient reason to mark them off my list, all by itself.
BiggJawn
(23,051 posts)Oh, how silly of me! I forgot that RealLiberals(tm) are allergic to firearms...
I don't think Gun owners are any less interested in seeing an end to Cancer than the Birkenstock crowd.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)and giving a few crumbs to cancer.
it's an ad campaign that benefits the gun seller far more than the Komen foundation.
if you want to give to charity, give to charity. if you want to buy a gun, you aren't giving to charity, you're just buying something.
if it makes you feel generous, you're deluding yourself.
BiggJawn
(23,051 posts)But I don't see any threads where people are upset about pink blenders and cell phones, do you?
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)this is not limited to guns.
if you ventured out of the gun threads, you might learn a little about what else is posted on DU.
but it's your loss.
anyway, sorry to interrupt your decadal train of thought about guns.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)And I think this is beyond hypocritical of them.
From your post, it seems people like me don't even exist in your worldview, and it's all black and white where gun owners are concerned.
Wow. Just wow.
BiggJawn
(23,051 posts)No birkies, but I shoot, have an FFL and a CCW permit. I'll match my RealLiberal bona-fides against anyone else's and I'm an Atheist on top of that.
You exist in my worldview, it's other people around this place who don't think we exist.
I just don't see anything wrong with a pink gun. If Ford can have their "Pink Warrior" campaign to sell SUVs, what's wrong with a gun shop having Walthers dura-coated pink? Nothing, IMO.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)very convincing.
BiggJawn
(23,051 posts)And that's when I'm in a GOOD mood...
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)defending guns and gun promotions.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)BiggJawn
(23,051 posts)So your point is?
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)It's a right-wing republican cheering section. Too bad they're here cheering more republicans. It's better they're left to their own little niche
Paladin
(28,264 posts)The more obscure that niche, the better.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)A large chunk of the players are gun nuts. Maybe next time Plaxico shoots himself in a night club, he can use a pink hand gun. If you look closely at most of these organizations, they are financed, and thus ruled by, far right people and organizations. This should be a surprise to no one. Give your money to PP, and skip the fascist middleman foundation.
Badsam
(180 posts)our money and some people think everybody is perfect.
At least when society collapses, I'll know there are plenty of homes undefended.
See ya soon