Baucus Explains Opposition To Background Checks: ‘Montana’
Source: Talking Points Memo
One of four red state Democrats to vote against a measure that would have expanded background checks for gun buyers, Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) provided a pithy and geographical explanation for his opposition to the proposal that failed in the Senate on Wednesday.
"Montana," Baucus said in explaining his vote, as quoted by the Los Angeles Times.
Along with Baucus, Democratic Sens. Mark Begich (AK), Mark Pryor (AR) and Heidi Heitkamp (ND) also cast votes against the measure. In explaining his vote, Begich argued that it's "dangerous to do any type of policy in an emotional moment."
Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/baucus-explains-opposition-to-background-checks-montana
SunSeeker
(51,571 posts)lark
(23,105 posts)F*ing traitor! I will gladly donate to any Dem brave enough to primary this jerk. Don't have a lot of money, but can't let this pass. Soooooooooo stupid when the vast majority of Americans, and I'd bet it's the same in his state, are pro background checks.
(referencing his total surrender to the gun mfg. lobby)
Montana redneck
(17 posts)And you're wrong about the support of the bill
lark
(23,105 posts)there should be an asterisk for *except Mt? Do you have specific poll #'s for just this fact from Mt? I'm sure they might be against the assault weapons or larger magazine (clips?) ban, but they are strongly against background checks that keep violent felons and people with mental disorders from buying guns? Really?
I'm from redneck No. FL. and background checks are supported here.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)ANY gun control bills are a non-starter there for many independents and pretty much all Republicans.
He likes his job, so he keeps the people who voted for him happy.
Montana redneck
(17 posts)If he intends on keeping his job he'll vote the way his constituents want. I agree Max is a puke and I hoped he'd vote for this so we can get rid of him. He is the poster boy for term limits. No I don't have a poll I live here I know of no family that doesn't have at least one gun. Many many men and women carry. People intend to pass their guns to there kids or sell them if they need money. This bill made both a lot harder. Many provisions in the bill were left to the justice dept. to decide how to implement and nobody trusts Holder. This bill would have been very costly to both govt and gun owners. I guess I do have a poll, went to 3 stores that sell guns ammo etc. The shelves are very bare...
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)Election if he had voted for it, and then we would have been stuck with a Repuke for a Senator. Hopefully our state will evolve in time. I'm from zoo town which is as liberal as it gets. I love my hometown.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)Baucus could get replaced by a "Second Amendment Remedy supporter" rather than a mere "Second Amendment supporter" like himself. I think that's the argument being made anyway.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)there must be an informed and enlightened voting constituency." (paraphrase)
we can do it
(12,189 posts)aquart
(69,014 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)aquart
(69,014 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)In explaining his vote, Begich argued that it's "dangerous to do any type of policy in an emotional moment."
So Begich is telling us that had he been in the Senate in 2001 he would have voted against the Patriot Act and against authorizing the war in Afghanistan because the "emotional moment" of 9/11 would have made such decisions "dangerous"?
I hate it when these guys dissemble ... just tell the truth: voting for background checks would have been politically difficult for my reelection campaign.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)a disproportionate amount of power. You go, Founders.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)WoodyD
(215 posts)We finally got rid of Conrad Burns but we're stuck with this joker.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)unfortunately. Many of us are not happy with his stance, but not surprised. I am actually kind of hoping he gets primaried, but that seems unlikely. People do like their guns here, so I think he's probably just being pragmatic considering that he has an election coming up next year.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)I will not vote for him....If Miller gets his spot so be it....I am starting to believe Government is not the friend it claims to be...
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)but either one would be pretty bad. I may just leave that vote blank or write someone in. Mark is so frustrating -- just when I think I can forgive him for his most recent pander, he goes and does something really stupid like this.
valerief
(53,235 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)"Nice dig!"
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)otohara
(24,135 posts)Fuck you Mark Begich -
bmbmd
(3,088 posts)"America".
ISW
(81 posts)Alamuti Lotus
(3,093 posts)"dangerous to do any type of policy in an emotional moment." -- utter horseshit hypocrisy, emotional manipulation in times of crisis is the bloody bread and butter for these two parties in legislature.
perdita9
(1,144 posts)...don't expect me to care about theirs.
Are the people in other states somehow less human or less American?
Baucus makes me sick.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)Rob H.
(5,351 posts)They moved to Great Falls about five years ago when my dad finally retired--that's where he was born and raised.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)Senator Reid needs to toss these four out of the caucus!
hack89
(39,171 posts)He is not going to punish other Dems from conservative states.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)How about the Resolution that led to the Iraq War? Also very emotional.
And then, some of the surveillance legislation? Overly emotional Congress acting without real deliberation?
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)Send Max to the custodians closet in the third sub-basement.
Daniel537
(1,560 posts)Passing emotion-based laws is dangerous. Just like at our response to 9/11. We need to do things that actually work, but that are also constitutional.
PADemD
(4,482 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)like "Rosebud"???
Response to LiberalElite (Reply #43)
Orsino This message was self-deleted by its author.