Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:49 AM Jun 2013

Sources: Decisions made on San Onofre nuclear plant flawed

Source: ABC 10 News San Diego

Sources tell Team 10 that that Southern California Edison let their desire for more profits outweigh safety concerns at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

So while San Onofre may be shutting down, the story behind the closure is far from over.

With a Department of Justice investigation in the works and millions at stake, SONGS remains a hot spot.

<snip>

We requested a response to our story from Southern California Edison on the issues raised in our report of June 12.

<snip>

Can you tell me who made up the Nuclear Safety Group Review at SCE/SONGS at the time of the companies 10CFR50.59 evaluation for the RSGs? This Safety Group is listed as the author of the internal SCE documents that 10News has acquired. The report is titled "Nuclear Safety Group Review of SONGS. If you can not provide names, please provide the titles of the individuals in the group. Our source says there were four people, a manager, two males and a female with "no experience in replacement steam generator design."

Response from Maureen Brown:

Unable to respond

<snip>

Read more: http://www.10news.com/news/sources-decisions-made-by-sce-for-san-onofre-nuclear-plant-flawed-061213

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sources: Decisions made on San Onofre nuclear plant flawed (Original Post) bananas Jun 2013 OP
Clear reason why company and not ratepayers should bear the cost of shut down on point Jun 2013 #1
The execs knew there was potential for disaster and blatantly lied about it... kristopher Jun 2013 #2

on point

(2,506 posts)
1. Clear reason why company and not ratepayers should bear the cost of shut down
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:54 AM
Jun 2013

And why they should go after the execs at the time and take away their pensions and salary from the time as fraudulent payments

Same for PGE btw for their gas pipelines.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
2. The execs knew there was potential for disaster and blatantly lied about it...
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 11:48 AM
Jun 2013

...to the public and the NRC.
I'm guessing their actions re the NRC were illegal.
Hope they get jail time.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sources: Decisions made o...