Decision to arm Syrian rebels was reached weeks ago, U.S. officials say
Source: Washington Post
President Obama’s decision to begin arming the Syrian rebels followed more than a year of internal debate over whether it was worth the dual risks of involving the United States in another war and seeing U.S. weapons fall into the hands of extremist groups among the rebels.
The White House said the final push came this week after U.S. intelligence agencies concluded with “high certainty” that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces had used chemical weapons against the rebels.
But U.S. officials said that the determination to send weapons had been made weeks ago and that the chemical weapons finding provided fresh justification to act.
As Syrian government forces, with the help of Hezbollah and Iranian militias, began to turn the war in Assad’s favor after rebel gains during the winter, Obama ordered officials in late April to begin planning what weaponry to send and how to deliver it.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/decision-to-arm-syrian-rebels-was-reached-weeks-ago-us-officials-say/2013/06/14/3cc2d372-d51a-11e2-8cbe-1bcbee06f8f8_singlePage.html
= new reply since forum marked as read
As Syrian government forces, with the help of Hezbollah and Iranian militias, began to turn the war in Assad’s favor after rebel gains during the winter,
Oh, right. It was totally Iran that turned the tide. No other country (*cough*Russia*cough*) could possibly have had anything to do with that.
edit: The risk of some small arms falling into the hands of al-Qaeda is manageable. The risk of "getting involved in another war in the Middle East", which, as it would be on Israel's doorstep, would likely be known as "World War III", is not.
Factoid: There is a Biblical prophecy that reads "Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap".
