Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 04:15 AM Jun 2013

NRC Considers Voiding Key Ruling On San Onofre

Source: KPBS

Federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff want to void a ruling that played a significant role in Southern California Edison’s decision to shut down the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

<snip>

Now, Kendra Ulrich of FOE said NRC staff are preparing to wipe the judges’ ruling from the record. Ulrich said the regulatory agency is too closely allied with the companies they are regulating.

“That’s why they want to vacate this order,” she said. “They want to make sure that this very comfortable relationship that they have established is maintained.“

The NRC did not respond to questions about the motion to vacate the ruling. Voiding the ruling will not change the decision to shut down San Onofre but it could affect communities in other states such as Ohio, which is seeking more transparency from the nuclear industry.

Read more: http://www.kpbs.org/news/2013/jun/14/nrc-considers-voiding-key-ruling-san-onofre/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NRC Considers Voiding Key Ruling On San Onofre (Original Post) bananas Jun 2013 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author graham4anything Jun 2013 #1
. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #2
Fuckers! That is all n/t Bluestar Jun 2013 #3
Good - there is no sane reason to close San Onofre dbackjon Jun 2013 #4
Please explain. antiquie Jun 2013 #5
No, there are no logical reasons dbackjon Jun 2013 #6
Overdue for shutdown antiquie Jun 2013 #7
The CEO of Edison International said the decision to close it was based on financial uncertainties Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #8
Riiiight- so "safe, clean, cheap" that even the owners want it closed wordpix Jun 2013 #9
SONGS is insane? Brother Buzz Jun 2013 #10

Response to bananas (Original post)

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
4. Good - there is no sane reason to close San Onofre
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 09:45 AM
Jun 2013

Ignorance is the only thing forcing it's closure

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
7. Overdue for shutdown
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 11:01 AM
Jun 2013

and huge modeling errors in their attempt to extend SONGS life. Perhaps you could supply details.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
9. Riiiight- so "safe, clean, cheap" that even the owners want it closed
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 11:33 AM
Jun 2013

Good try, go back to your nuke employers and tell them it didn't work. And you/they need to read "Nuclear Roulette: The Case Against the Nuclear Renaissance." It's FREE right here: http://ifg.org/pdf/Nuclear_Roulette_book.pdf

Brother Buzz

(36,440 posts)
10. SONGS is insane?
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 11:55 AM
Jun 2013

There was a simple sane reason to close the plant that any cookie counter could understand: The bottom line

The white elephant was costing to much to repair with no economically viable fix in sight; they pulled the plug after their band-aid repairs did not pass muster with the NRC.

The growing public objection to firing up a questionably safe nuclear reactor was only the catalyst to closing the plant.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NRC Considers Voiding Key...