Carney: Harkin 'willfully ignorant' on ObamaCare delay
Source: The Hill
On the heels of criticism from Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) over the delay in ObamaCare's employer mandate, White House press secretary Jay Carney said on Wednesday that those who suggested delaying the employer mandate in the president's signature healthcare law was unusual were "willfully ignorant about past precedent."
"People who suggest that there's anything unusual about the delaying of a deadline in the implementation of a complex and comprehensive law are, you know, deliberately sticking their heads in the sand or are just willfully ignorant about past precedent," Carney said. "It's just not it's not serious."
Republicans have highlighted comments by Harkin, the chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, in an interview with The New York Times, in which he suggested that delaying the provision requiring large employers to offer healthcare coverage subverted the law.
"This was the law. How can they change the law?" Harkin asked the paper.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/310201-carney-harkin-willfully-ignorant-on-obamacare-delay
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Obama does not delay when it comes to appointing Republicans to top positions in his administration, but when it comes to making this health care program that so many Americans need and are counting on a reality, delay, delay, excuses, excuses.
If employers don't want to do their part, then we need to switch to single payer and simply tax all employers and employees for health care -- all of them.
That's what European countries that I have lived in did. They just took the money out of your paycheck and pursued employers who did not pay for the single payer coverage of their employees.
No ifs, ands, or buts. And everyone gets covered.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)the Obama Administration's ass.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)Republicans are criticizing the delay because they hate the bill and want proof that its not going to work. Harkin is criticizing the delay because he knows that its one of the most important pieces of the puzzle. Harkin voted for the bill and he also supported single payer, he's one of the most liberal/progressive senators and has a great voting record.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)It was the Republicans he took a swipe at.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)That's what someone called this yesterday, "regulatory capture".
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)and they lose all sense of reality?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)but I think they mean "passing a grand, sweeping law for show, then dragging your feet about implementing the regulations".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Heumann#Life
xocet
(3,873 posts)...previously...
For LBN: Use the EXACT TITLE of the article you are posting, without additional comment. If there is no title yet, be descriptive.
It seems that The Hill has a bit of a slant in its imprecise headline and that the OP left "..., critics..." out of the title.
Carney (time index 1:17) to Jonathan Karl: "Jon, you can pretend this is about Tom Harkin, but you know its not."
Here is a similar rebuke of a FOX News reporter:
Here is the New York Times article that contains the Harkin quotation:
By JONATHAN WEISMAN and ROBERT PEAR
Published: July 9, 2013
WASHINGTON House Republican leaders on Tuesday seized on the Obama administrations one-year delay of a mandate for larger employers to offer health insurance or face penalties, demanding the same postponement for the mandate on individual insurance purchases and promising a series of showdowns aimed at dividing Democrats from the White House.
...
Some Democrats were also dismayed by the White Houses actions. Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and an author of the health law, questioned whether Mr. Obama had the authority to unilaterally delay the employer mandate.
This was the law. How can they change the law? he asked.
...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/10/us/politics/house-gop-pushes-delay-on-individual-mandate-in-health-law.html?_r=0
(N.B., The White House does not seem to have this video up yet on their site - otherwise, I would have sourced the video differently.)
NOTE: The Hill seems to be adjusting its article headline: the original headline probably read as in the OP. My apologies to the OP. The article now has a headline of "Carney: GOP critics 'willfully ignorant' on ObamaCare delay":
By Justin Sink - 07/10/13 02:28 PM ET
On the heels of criticism from Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) over the delay in ObamaCare's employer mandate, White House press secretary Jay Carney said on Wednesday that those who suggested delaying the employer mandate in the president's signature healthcare law was unusual were "willfully ignorant about past precedent."
...
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/310201-carney-harkin-willfully-ignorant-on-obamacare-delay#ixzz2Yg3hISgz
became
By Justin Sink - 07/10/13 02:28 PM ET
On the heels of criticism from Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) over the delay in ObamaCare's employer mandate, White House press secretary Jay Carney said on Wednesday that those who suggested delaying the employer mandate in the president's signature healthcare law was unusual were "willfully ignorant about past precedent."
...
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/310201-carney-harkin-willfully-ignorant-on-obamacare-delay#ixzz2Yg2QUIWk
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)That is really stupid IMO - patronizing anti-American terrorists.
xocet
(3,873 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)wpelb
(338 posts)... Jay Carney said on Wednesday that those who suggested delaying the employer mandate in the president's signature healthcare law was unusual were "willfully ignorant about past precedent."
The problem is that if you're running, or have run, on a platform of "hope and change," you can't really appeal to "past precedent" to justify your actions. It would have been smarter for Carney to direct reporters to language in the bill that allows or even requires the administration to delay the implementation, assuming that such exists and isn't couched in so much legalize the layperson can't understand it.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)And what's with the PR sloppiness lately? It's like there's no motivation to make it look polished anymore.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)He said this during a rant about Republicans using this as an excuse for repeal.
When questioned about Harkin, he was very respectful.
Someone at The Hill is trying to make a big stink about nothing.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Please edit your OP subject line to reflect the 'published' headline.
Thanks
xocet
(3,873 posts)What you are seeing is, I believe, either the second or, possibly, third headline that article has had.
Cha
(297,701 posts)You're going against LBN rules here, Freddie.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)i just watched the video of Carney, he resisted the reporter's efforts to make it about Harkin.
Peregrine Took
(7,417 posts)and put him over his knee for a good spanking.