Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,660 posts)
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 06:58 AM Jul 2013

Fla. cities on guard for any post-Zimmerman unrest

Source: AP-Excite

By CURT ANDERSON and MIKE SCHNEIDER

MIAMI (AP) - Police and city leaders in Florida say they have taken precautionary steps for the possibility of mass protests or even civil unrest if George Zimmerman is acquitted in the killing of unarmed teen Trayvon Martin, particularly in African-American neighborhoods where passions run strongest over the case.

For months, officials in Sanford and South Florida have been working with pastors, youth coaches, community activists and summer camp counselors to stress a non-violent approach if Zimmerman walks free. At the same time, police say they have quietly been making plans for dealing with any potential emotional flare-ups that could quickly turn into storefront-smashing, car-burning riots.

"It's all right to be vocal, but we don't want to be violent," said the Rev. Walter T. Richardson, a longtime pastor and chairman of Miami-Dade County's Community Relations Board, which has been holding town hall-style meetings about the case. "We've already lost one soul and we don't want to lose any more."

Martin, from the suburb of Miami Gardens, was 17 when he died. He was in Sanford visiting his father and father's fiancee when Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, fatally shot him during a physical confrontation in a gated community in February 2012.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20130711/DA7F76U83.html





In this July 8, 2013 file photo, George Zimmerman sits in the courtroom during his trial in Seminole Circuit Court, in Sanford, Fla. Police and city leaders in Sanford and South Florida are preparing for the possibility of mass demonstrations and civil unrest if Zimmerman is acquitted in the killing of unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin, particularly in African-American neighborhoods where passions about the case run strongest. (AP Photo /Orlando Sentinel, Joe Burbank, Pool, File)

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fla. cities on guard for any post-Zimmerman unrest (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jul 2013 OP
I'm sure glad John Roberts assured us that racism is over. GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #1
But racism in which direction? I doubt they are doing much preparation for a guilty verdict 7962 Jul 2013 #2
"When's the last time whites rioted after a verdict?" Scootaloo Jul 2013 #11
thank you heaven05 Jul 2013 #23
+ 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #27
Excellent points! n/t adirondacker Jul 2013 #29
Thanks Scootaloo! JustAnotherGen Jul 2013 #31
You obviously dont know the definition of "bigot" if you think my post was bigoted. And "raging"? 7962 Jul 2013 #35
I wasn't talking to you JustAnotherGen Jul 2013 #36
Well, then I apologize. And thanks for the clarification. 7962 Jul 2013 #37
Better than a half dozen ops DonCoquixote Jul 2013 #38
Amen 1000 times. tblue Jul 2013 #39
righteous, Scootaloo Skittles Jul 2013 #42
1st whoisme1 Jul 2013 #44
You do understand that race and ethnicity aren't the same thing, right? cyberswede Jul 2013 #46
First... Scootaloo Jul 2013 #47
Paranoid much are they? hobbit709 Jul 2013 #3
I don't see how Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #8
Using stand your ground as a defense when provoking the incident. hobbit709 Jul 2013 #10
But Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #12
And they've hinting around it ever since hobbit709 Jul 2013 #16
Wow obxhead Jul 2013 #14
See # 16 hobbit709 Jul 2013 #17
??? heaven05 Jul 2013 #22
There are forces at play that want riots Dash87 Jul 2013 #30
Yes. Dr. Strange Jul 2013 #40
it's like an admission of how they KNOW it's not justice Skittles Jul 2013 #43
Sad to say, joshdawg Jul 2013 #4
So I assume they are taking this seriously... Earth_First Jul 2013 #5
Disgusting. KarenS Jul 2013 #6
it is proper planning Niceguy1 Jul 2013 #7
I agree Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #15
They are only being inflammatory FarPoint Jul 2013 #9
Yup. It'll ratchet up the gun and ammo sales. nt BumRushDaShow Jul 2013 #20
guns are now reasonably in stock in all but the newest or high end of modern sport rifles ammo.... ceonupe Jul 2013 #32
Very interesting post tiredtoo Jul 2013 #13
When you got John2 Jul 2013 #18
+1000 heaven05 Jul 2013 #21
I think John2 Jul 2013 #19
+1000 heaven05 Jul 2013 #24
This Is Disgusting DallasNE Jul 2013 #25
Manipulation is being attempted here. They want riots. They want targets. Dash87 Jul 2013 #33
Unite whoisme1 Jul 2013 #45
Another Reason This Is Disgusting DallasNE Jul 2013 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author Malone Jul 2013 #26
Funny, I wasn't aware that Peruvians had been historically subjected to over 300 years of kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #28
most of the indigenous peruvians have for longer than that. hello?? n/t Bacchus4.0 Jul 2013 #34
 

7962

(11,841 posts)
2. But racism in which direction? I doubt they are doing much preparation for a guilty verdict
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:21 AM
Jul 2013

Honestly, when is the last time whites rioted after a verdict? If Zimmerman was black or Martin white, would this case have ever been on the news? The sad thing is, there have already BEEN several "revenge" incidents before the trial even happened. This case reminds me too much of the rodney king trial. The prosecution in that case screwed up by filing attempted murder charges. There was no way a jury using the evidence provided, could find the cops guilty. It was very simple; if they wanted him dead, 15 idiot cops on top of him would have killed him.
In this case, murder will be hard to prove and so far they have failed to do so IMO. Doesnt mean the jury wont come back with a guilty verdict though.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
11. "When's the last time whites rioted after a verdict?"
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:41 AM
Jul 2013

Last edited Thu Jul 11, 2013, 08:21 AM - Edit history (1)

I dunno.

When's the last time a black man gunned down an unarmed 17 year old white kid, and got dusted off and sent home without a peep by black officers?

Did this black gunman chase the kid down after being told to not do so by dispatchers?

Did he have a history of harassing and making phone calls when he saw white people in his neighborhood?

Did this black gunner get to go on Hannity to make his case to the nation without a word of interruption from the cow-eyed host?

Did the gunman receive hundreds of thousands of dollars in his defense from concerned / congratulatory black people?

Was there a company that produced shooting range targets in the likeness of the dead white child?

Did that child wait at the morgue for a few days before the police decided to inform his parents?

Did the major networks spend weeks characterizing the slain white child as "trailer trash" who was probably a drug addict?

Does the defense's case depend on characterizing this child as a peckerwood thug, a racist, trash-talking brute who lies in wait to pounce on and lynch innocent blacks who happen to be chasing him through the neighborhood while armed?

Do the networks cluck and shake their heads about how a white witness for the prosecution speaks with a southern accent, explaining to us watching at home that she's a terrible witness because of her "improper English?"

Do the white communities of Florida have a history of all of these sort of instances targeting them in such fashion?

Do the white citizen of Florida feel that a verdict of "not guilty" will clear trigger-happy black men to murder them with the claim "I wuz skurred!"

You can't compare situations that do not bear comparison.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
31. Thanks Scootaloo!
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:19 PM
Jul 2013

And that's a perfect example of a raging bigot running around Democratic Underground. A perfect example.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
35. You obviously dont know the definition of "bigot" if you think my post was bigoted. And "raging"?
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:13 PM
Jul 2013

Please. Nothing I said was rude or offensive. I merely pointed out one small point. And nothing that followed refuted that point. Hell, you dont even know MY racial makeup! My main point is that if the races were reversed, this doesnt make the news outside of sanford. There have been many threats posted (not here on du) about retribution. There have already been people attacked in martin's name. The reverse has not happened in past crimes as far as I know.
And the defense was NOT allowed to use Martins past as evidence in the case. They tried, but it was not allowed.
I do not think Zimmerman was right in what he did. He's an idiot. He ended one life and probably ruined hos own regardless of the verdict. I think he overstepped what neighborhood watches should do. But if the prosecution doesnt allow for conviction on a lesser charge, they have not proven murder as defined.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
36. I wasn't talking to you
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:16 PM
Jul 2013

And I didn't find what you said rude or offensive.

But it's funny you wasted all that time typing to me!

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
37. Well, then I apologize. And thanks for the clarification.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:37 PM
Jul 2013

But it really didnt take THAT long to type!!

whoisme1

(2 posts)
44. 1st
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 10:59 AM
Jul 2013

White? Come on people have you become so blind and brain washed by the mass media that you see a clearly brown man as white just because they tell you so? I don't think any "white" people who have full Latino features. Obama is also half white but is called black.

Putting the obvious and unimportant facts aside. This issue you have about this injustice shouldn't be about race. This racial stirring done in the media is to make you angry, it is meant to divide and conquer. The government wants us to fight amongst ourselves.

In this day and age we have to unite not segregate if we want to keep our rights and freedoms.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
47. First...
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 05:23 PM
Jul 2013

The poster I was responding to asked "when was the last time whites rioted over a verdict?"

Second, spare me this colorblind bullshit. Race exists. Racism is real. You can argue if it should or not, but the fact is that the way things stand, it does. Noting that reality is not "segregation," and frankly that claim is one of the fucking stupidest things I've seen on this subject - and you're facing some stiff competition there.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
3. Paranoid much are they?
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:21 AM
Jul 2013

They should have thought of those consequences before they came up with laws that basically give carte blanche to kill minorities.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
8. I don't see how
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:38 AM
Jul 2013

The same laws that have governed self defense for decades give "carte blanche" to kill minorities. I say that as a minority female who has had to use force in self defense and had those laws protect her.

Quite frankly if there are riots, part of the blame will be on people making hyperbolic claims like yours all over the media that less informed people will think are grounded in reality.

Lets be real here. Zimmerman probably is a racist. He probably instigated it all. But the problem here isn't the law, it is that this prosecution is doing a HORRIBLE job of presenting the case, and because the initial responders didn't do a very good job. Not because there is some law that says it is ok to shoot minorities.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
12. But
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:47 AM
Jul 2013

Stand your ground is not being used as a defense in this case. The defense elected not to make a SYG claim and it has not come in to play one bit.

 

obxhead

(8,434 posts)
14. Wow
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 08:07 AM
Jul 2013

I strongly suggest you do a tiny bit of research on the case you are commenting on.

Hint, Stand your ground is NOT the defense Zimmerman is using.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
30. There are forces at play that want riots
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:16 PM
Jul 2013

This isn't real concern - it's social engineering.

They're going to get proven wrong despite their baiting. There won't be riots, and they won't be able to take their guns out (which is what they want).

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
7. it is proper planning
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:34 AM
Jul 2013

As unpopular verdicts have resulted in riots in the past......... they wou ld be negligent if they didn't plan.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
15. I agree
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 08:12 AM
Jul 2013

You already have people on social media making threats to riot, and you have historical precedent.

Any agency would be pretty negligent to not plan for the possibility.

That said I am mad as hell at all the morons on twitter talking about how they want to riot- way to feed the stereotypes and give the racists something to parade arouond morons.

FarPoint

(12,409 posts)
9. They are only being inflammatory
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:39 AM
Jul 2013

which ignites the Zimmyites to lock-n-load for the verdict. "All black males be on alert".

This could be ugly as they will refer to the Zimmy defense to justify their actions.

 

ceonupe

(597 posts)
32. guns are now reasonably in stock in all but the newest or high end of modern sport rifles ammo....
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:22 PM
Jul 2013

guns are now reasonably in stock in all but the newest or high end of modern sport rifles ammo not so much.

Ammo is still way below normal stock levels.

tiredtoo

(2,949 posts)
13. Very interesting post
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 08:04 AM
Jul 2013

I had a post hid last week for suggesting the trial was just a farce being held to placate the B*****. My post was hid as being racist. Had I just said the placate the masses it may have gone unflagged. And I still think Zimmerman will walk. I can see unrest in the masses no matter what the results, there are many on both sides ready to react with possible violence included. The radical right has had a fire in their ass since Obama was elected and then re-elected. JMHO

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
18. When you got
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 08:51 AM
Jul 2013

posters on this board continuing to give cover for a non guilty verdict, then it would be easier for the jury to acquit and justify it. I'm going to point it out again contrary to what another poster's claims and they refute the it.

1. The prosecution provided evidence Zimmerman followed Martin. It angers me when someone claims they didn't.
2. The prosecution proved Zimmerman had some animous towards Martin, with language like Aholes, punks, and considering him a suspect. Does someone providing cover want to deny this?
3. The Defense did not provide any evidence Martin jumped this man or circled back. People providing cover for a non guilty verdict is just taking Zimmerman's words as evidence and using his injuries to make that leap.


From the very beginning of this trial people suspected the jury was stacked by the judge favoring the Defense's choices and striking Blacks off the jury. Omara claimed in the Press that he wished Blacks was in the jury, but it was O'Mara that struck them. You see the deviouness in that. It was a pre-empted strike through the media to provide cover for the verdict. Now they are targeting the Black community if they get angry.

Now they are using a pre-empted justification through the media to pacify the emotions of people who will get upset over a trumped up trial. People will have a right to get upset at these five white women and one hispanic. Just because they are women, don't mean they can't be racist.Sanford is 20 percent black,0ver 20 percent Hispanic and only over 40 percent white, yet the jury is 99 percent white and 1percent hispanic.

Anyone claiming this would be a verdict by his peers is a lying, because it does not represent the community. Now you got the Police Chief breaking silence saying the investigation was stolen from them. Is there any doubt they didn't want to bring this to trial now? The bottomline, evidence was shown Zimmerman committed murder, and not self defense. What they did was demonize the victim and tried to make him less human. Zimmerman;s trainer has no dam business giving testimony on the physical capabilities of Trayvon, having never even met the kid in his life. That is how bullshit this trial was. And the prosecution went along with it.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
19. I think
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 09:16 AM
Jul 2013

the Black community will behave just well, but relations between certain people and the black community want remain the same as usual. It just got worse. Right now, I don't have any respect for O'Mara,WEst, Judge Nelson or the police Department of Sanford Florida as a Black person. I now see what the African American community in Sanford have been going through with the Justice System in Sanford Florida and its police Department. If their reputation was damaged locally with african Americans, it is now damaged nationally. Before this trial, I didn't know one thing about the community of Sanford Florida. And if I ever travel through that community as a Black person, I would make sure, I'm armed.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
25. This Is Disgusting
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 11:41 AM
Jul 2013

Why publish an expectation of a riot? That almost sends the message to riot so it makes no sense. It also sends a message of expectations that this jury cannot come to a fair verdict. Law enforcement is even asking this Judge to release a verdict on a weekday. That means that the earliest this sequestered Jury can be released would be next Monday. But the pace this trial is proceeding that may be optimistic anyway.

Bottom line, this is being handled horribly by authorities. I think most people have already concluded that justice is not blind and never has been. And Don West is doing his best to make sure the Judge knows this too.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
33. Manipulation is being attempted here. They want riots. They want targets.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:23 PM
Jul 2013

It's classic social engineering. The police put out a press release saying, "oh please don't riot!" which in turn plants the seed for there to be riots.

The gun nuts want this. I say lets give them nothing - no riot, no attention, just peaceful action.

whoisme1

(2 posts)
45. Unite
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 11:08 AM
Jul 2013

Exactly. They want a race war. The result of which will be more incarcerations and loss of freedoms. All in the name of security and protecting America.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
41. Another Reason This Is Disgusting
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 05:27 PM
Jul 2013

Where is the talk of preparations for a guilty verdict? This is an obvious double standard as there are a lot of cowboys out there with guns that will be very upset with a guilty verdict so that has to be a risk -- that some cowboy will go out looking for trouble, gun in hand and a willingness to use it at the slightest provocation. Not a prediction; just saying.

Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
28. Funny, I wasn't aware that Peruvians had been historically subjected to over 300 years of
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 11:58 AM
Jul 2013

massive, systematic discrimination and oppression and injustice in the US.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fla. cities on guard for ...