U.S. June budget surplus $117 billion: Treasury
Source: MarketWatch
The U.S. federal government ran a budget surplus of $117 billion in June, the Treasury Department reported Thursday, as receipts rose and spending fell compared to the same month a year ago.
Read more: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-june-budget-surplus-117-billion-treasury-2013-07-11-1491013?link=MW_home_latest_news
Improving economy? Sequester?
Both?
msongs
(67,420 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)I know you exist on DU to bash Obama and diminish his achievements at every turn, but damn dude... Sometimes good news is just good news.
msongs
(67,420 posts)goal.
demwing
(16,916 posts)I can reduce my credit card debt through austerity. I'll just stop buying food, paying rent, and paying taxes. My caredit card debt will drop, but I will fucking die.
Just because Austerity can reduce the deficit, doesn't mean austerity is desirable, good, logical, humane, or even the best option available.
Why, after 30k posts at DU, does this need to be explained to you? Did your empathy break?
yodermon
(6,143 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)Because that is the primary reason we're seeing the deficit shrink.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Here's a better article with more details..
"An improving economy and tax hikes enacted earlier in theyear led government receipts to rise to $287 billion, up 10percent from a year earlier.
Also driving the surplus in June, state-backed mortgagecompanies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were bailed out bytaxpayers in the wake of the financial crisis but have sincereturned to profitability, poured billion of dollars into publiccoffers.
Fannie Mae, which said in May it would return $59 billion tothe Treasury in dividends, provided most of the funds."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-posts-117-billion-budget-180018328.html
denverbill
(11,489 posts)Igel
(35,320 posts)Where I worked, this kind of thing wouldn't have been credited as revenue but as negative expenses if it happened in the same year. Heck, even if it happened in different years.
$59 billion of a previous year's deficit was erased. In this case, it's from something like 4 years ago. So that huge, huge deficit wasn't actually (all things considered) as huge as it was on paper. On the other hand, it means that this surplus isn't as huge as it is on paper, either.
It has a levelling effect. Reduces an old, huge deficit; reduces a current, although not so huge, increase in revenues.
TARP had the same kind of effect. It swelled the 2009 deficit by something like $400 billion or $500 billion; then when it was repaid it had the effect of reducing the deficit by the same amount. It makes early years look worse than they turned out to have been; and subsidizes current spending (or revenues) with money that isn't really income.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Not part of austerity is the end to both the payroll tax cut and the new higher bracket for really high earners, higher employment ( increased tax collections), lower unemployment benefits and decreased Medicare costs from Obamacare. The sequester is $85 billion and 1/12 of that is $7.1 billion or about 6%. What this really shows is that you don't need to inflict the pain of sequester type cuts in order to get a favorable outcome -- kind of like happened when Clinton was President. While we are not there yet, for a variety of reasons, doing more would risk stalling out the economy and increasing the deficit.
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)GObama!
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)and senior services and so forth is always going to save money.
What else should we chop? I'll bet if we eliminate WIC, Medicare and welfare entirely we'll save a bundle.
And the stock market just went to a record high.
Oh joy!
Now how does this translate into jobs?
Oh right, it doesn't.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)figure to 200% of poverty, and we want to be happy that we can count our stacks of gold?
Has Uncle Sam been killed off by Scrooge McDuck?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)wasn't hindering growth.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)Lasher
(27,598 posts)Sorry to oppose the prevailing sentiment here, but I think a budget surplus is a good thing.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)"An improving economy and tax hikes enacted earlier in theyear led government receipts to rise to $287 billion, up 10percent from a year earlier.
Also driving the surplus in June, state-backed mortgagecompanies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were bailed out bytaxpayers in the wake of the financial crisis but have sincereturned to profitability, poured billion of dollars into publiccoffers.
Fannie Mae, which said in May it would return $59 billion tothe Treasury in dividends, provided most of the funds."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-posts-117-billion-budget-180018328.html
No doubt the GOP will cry foul.. Obama is cooking the books again! Idiots.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)adieu
(1,009 posts)that austerity only dropped the overall budget by about 4%, but that 4% rested on the backs of the poor and the needy. So the austerity did not have a significant effect on the budget surplus, as opposed to greater revenue.
RussBLib
(9,020 posts)...that means we will have to pass a tax CUT to give that surplus back to the people! After all, it's the people's money!
Do I have the GOP hogwash correct?
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)house gopers voted all many times on a jobs bill? Who wants the sequester? Who doesn't care about the 99%? What party want the 1% to pay their fair share of taxes alongwith the corporations? What party want overall health care and for those who ignore information, some of that surplus is because of Obamacare. What party want to save public education? Which party enjoys seeing government employees get laid off without unemployment insurance and what party enjoys seeing people furlough. Which party cares for 1% than feeding children. What party don't give a eff about students and college loans.
I'm tired of this crap. Guess you guys refer what happened in 2000 thereafter . . .500 -750 thousand people paid off each month. Civil liberties gone especially for women, workers, voters, and the poor - oops that may equal to at 75%.
The man have unprecedented obstruction every where he turns concerning the economy.
ConcernedCanuk
(13,509 posts).
.
.
It's just accountants playing with numbers.
USA owns over 20% of the World debt, 11 trillion+
They can make a "budget" - and say "hey! - we came underneath it"
so can any state
"double speak" I think is the term
For the curious
check the link below
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_debt
CC
Garion_55
(1,915 posts)uh huh
bushisanidiot
(8,064 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Saves us billions in future interest and rebalances the future budget towards the black.
Wolf Frankula
(3,601 posts)Time for another tax cut for rich people. And we can now afford another war! Let's intervene in Syria.
Wolf
DCBob
(24,689 posts)at least for awhile.
Kingofalldems
(38,459 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)and an elitist, Marxist, Maoist, populist.