Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. June budget surplus $117 billion: Treasury (Original Post) Shrek Jul 2013 OP
more proof that austerity works, so let's get even more austerity :-) nt msongs Jul 2013 #1
Would you prefer a massively rising deficit that Republicans always deliver? tridim Jul 2013 #3
austerity policies are slashing the deficit, so more would be better if slashing the defecit is the msongs Jul 2013 #4
At what cost? THINK! demwing Jul 2013 #6
after 30k posts I would expect it's sarcasm n/t yodermon Jul 2013 #27
Do you consider raising taxes on the rich "austerity"? tridim Jul 2013 #17
Its nothing to do with austerity.. its moslty rising tax revenues and Fannie/Freddie improving. DCBob Jul 2013 #8
Which explains why Republicans want to privatize Fannie/Freddie.n/t denverbill Jul 2013 #16
In this case it's reimbursement. Igel Jul 2013 #19
I would call it return on investment. DCBob Jul 2013 #31
Austerity Is A Small Part Of It DallasNE Jul 2013 #22
Blame it on Barry! truthisfreedom Jul 2013 #2
Well sure. Cutting unemployment benefits and food stamps… MrSlayer Jul 2013 #5
50 million people in poverty, near that on food stamps, closes in on 100 million if you just up the jtuck004 Jul 2013 #7
Improving economy. The deficit would fall even faster if the stupid sequester geek tragedy Jul 2013 #9
+1 SunSeeker Jul 2013 #18
Correct. Lasher Jul 2013 #24
Here's a better article explaining the reasons.. DCBob Jul 2013 #10
Thanks, DCBob! eom Kolesar Jul 2013 #26
I think it was already shown adieu Jul 2013 #11
well, you know what THAT means... RussBLib Jul 2013 #12
Here we go again Iliyah Jul 2013 #13
Who are they trying to fool? oh - just everyone . . ConcernedCanuk Jul 2013 #14
and republicans everywhere cheered obama!!! Garion_55 Jul 2013 #15
Thanks, President Obama! bushisanidiot Jul 2013 #20
pay off on the loan principle. That's what Pres. O mentioned last year as use for surplus $ Sunlei Jul 2013 #21
We Have a 117 Billion Surplus Wolf Frankula Jul 2013 #23
The biggest benefit of this is that it takes the debt ceiling weapon away from the Republicans. DCBob Jul 2013 #25
Obama is a communist Kingofalldems Jul 2013 #28
A communist, socialist, Kenyan demwing Jul 2013 #29
That surplus--part of his plan to destroy America. Kingofalldems Jul 2013 #30

tridim

(45,358 posts)
3. Would you prefer a massively rising deficit that Republicans always deliver?
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:16 PM
Jul 2013

I know you exist on DU to bash Obama and diminish his achievements at every turn, but damn dude... Sometimes good news is just good news.

msongs

(67,420 posts)
4. austerity policies are slashing the deficit, so more would be better if slashing the defecit is the
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:23 PM
Jul 2013

goal.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
6. At what cost? THINK!
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:31 PM
Jul 2013

I can reduce my credit card debt through austerity. I'll just stop buying food, paying rent, and paying taxes. My caredit card debt will drop, but I will fucking die.

Just because Austerity can reduce the deficit, doesn't mean austerity is desirable, good, logical, humane, or even the best option available.

Why, after 30k posts at DU, does this need to be explained to you? Did your empathy break?

tridim

(45,358 posts)
17. Do you consider raising taxes on the rich "austerity"?
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 04:09 PM
Jul 2013

Because that is the primary reason we're seeing the deficit shrink.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
8. Its nothing to do with austerity.. its moslty rising tax revenues and Fannie/Freddie improving.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:40 PM
Jul 2013

Here's a better article with more details..

"An improving economy and tax hikes enacted earlier in theyear led government receipts to rise to $287 billion, up 10percent from a year earlier.

Also driving the surplus in June, state-backed mortgagecompanies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were bailed out bytaxpayers in the wake of the financial crisis but have sincereturned to profitability, poured billion of dollars into publiccoffers.

Fannie Mae, which said in May it would return $59 billion tothe Treasury in dividends, provided most of the funds."

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-posts-117-billion-budget-180018328.html

Igel

(35,320 posts)
19. In this case it's reimbursement.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 04:51 PM
Jul 2013

Where I worked, this kind of thing wouldn't have been credited as revenue but as negative expenses if it happened in the same year. Heck, even if it happened in different years.

$59 billion of a previous year's deficit was erased. In this case, it's from something like 4 years ago. So that huge, huge deficit wasn't actually (all things considered) as huge as it was on paper. On the other hand, it means that this surplus isn't as huge as it is on paper, either.

It has a levelling effect. Reduces an old, huge deficit; reduces a current, although not so huge, increase in revenues.

TARP had the same kind of effect. It swelled the 2009 deficit by something like $400 billion or $500 billion; then when it was repaid it had the effect of reducing the deficit by the same amount. It makes early years look worse than they turned out to have been; and subsidizes current spending (or revenues) with money that isn't really income.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
22. Austerity Is A Small Part Of It
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 06:59 PM
Jul 2013

Not part of austerity is the end to both the payroll tax cut and the new higher bracket for really high earners, higher employment ( increased tax collections), lower unemployment benefits and decreased Medicare costs from Obamacare. The sequester is $85 billion and 1/12 of that is $7.1 billion or about 6%. What this really shows is that you don't need to inflict the pain of sequester type cuts in order to get a favorable outcome -- kind of like happened when Clinton was President. While we are not there yet, for a variety of reasons, doing more would risk stalling out the economy and increasing the deficit.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
5. Well sure. Cutting unemployment benefits and food stamps…
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:24 PM
Jul 2013

and senior services and so forth is always going to save money.

What else should we chop? I'll bet if we eliminate WIC, Medicare and welfare entirely we'll save a bundle.

And the stock market just went to a record high.

Oh joy!

Now how does this translate into jobs?

Oh right, it doesn't.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
7. 50 million people in poverty, near that on food stamps, closes in on 100 million if you just up the
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:35 PM
Jul 2013

figure to 200% of poverty, and we want to be happy that we can count our stacks of gold?

Has Uncle Sam been killed off by Scrooge McDuck?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. Improving economy. The deficit would fall even faster if the stupid sequester
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:43 PM
Jul 2013

wasn't hindering growth.

Lasher

(27,598 posts)
24. Correct.
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 07:15 AM
Jul 2013

Sorry to oppose the prevailing sentiment here, but I think a budget surplus is a good thing.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
10. Here's a better article explaining the reasons..
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:43 PM
Jul 2013

"An improving economy and tax hikes enacted earlier in theyear led government receipts to rise to $287 billion, up 10percent from a year earlier.

Also driving the surplus in June, state-backed mortgagecompanies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were bailed out bytaxpayers in the wake of the financial crisis but have sincereturned to profitability, poured billion of dollars into publiccoffers.

Fannie Mae, which said in May it would return $59 billion tothe Treasury in dividends, provided most of the funds."

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-posts-117-billion-budget-180018328.html


No doubt the GOP will cry foul.. Obama is cooking the books again! Idiots.

 

adieu

(1,009 posts)
11. I think it was already shown
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:45 PM
Jul 2013

that austerity only dropped the overall budget by about 4%, but that 4% rested on the backs of the poor and the needy. So the austerity did not have a significant effect on the budget surplus, as opposed to greater revenue.

RussBLib

(9,020 posts)
12. well, you know what THAT means...
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:49 PM
Jul 2013

...that means we will have to pass a tax CUT to give that surplus back to the people! After all, it's the people's money!

Do I have the GOP hogwash correct?

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
13. Here we go again
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:52 PM
Jul 2013

house gopers voted all many times on a jobs bill? Who wants the sequester? Who doesn't care about the 99%? What party want the 1% to pay their fair share of taxes alongwith the corporations? What party want overall health care and for those who ignore information, some of that surplus is because of Obamacare. What party want to save public education? Which party enjoys seeing government employees get laid off without unemployment insurance and what party enjoys seeing people furlough. Which party cares for 1% than feeding children. What party don't give a eff about students and college loans.

I'm tired of this crap. Guess you guys refer what happened in 2000 thereafter . . .500 -750 thousand people paid off each month. Civil liberties gone especially for women, workers, voters, and the poor - oops that may equal to at 75%.

The man have unprecedented obstruction every where he turns concerning the economy.

 

ConcernedCanuk

(13,509 posts)
14. Who are they trying to fool? oh - just everyone . .
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 02:59 PM
Jul 2013

.
.
.

It's just accountants playing with numbers.

USA owns over 20% of the World debt, 11 trillion+

They can make a "budget" - and say "hey! - we came underneath it"

so can any state

"double speak" I think is the term

For the curious

check the link below

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_debt

CC

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
21. pay off on the loan principle. That's what Pres. O mentioned last year as use for surplus $
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 05:33 PM
Jul 2013

Saves us billions in future interest and rebalances the future budget towards the black.

Wolf Frankula

(3,601 posts)
23. We Have a 117 Billion Surplus
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:34 PM
Jul 2013

Time for another tax cut for rich people. And we can now afford another war! Let's intervene in Syria.

Wolf

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
25. The biggest benefit of this is that it takes the debt ceiling weapon away from the Republicans.
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 07:30 AM
Jul 2013

at least for awhile.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. June budget surplus ...