Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ptah

(33,044 posts)
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 07:26 PM Feb 2012

The General Lee, donning the Confederate flag, barred by NASCAR at March race at PIR

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/speed/articles/2012/02/17/20120217general-lee-nascar-bubba-watson-confederate-flag.html

Bubba Watson, a PGA Tour golfer who purchased the famed General Lee car from the 1980's
TV show The Dukes of Hazzard, will not be allowed to drive the vehicle as the pace car prior to
the NASCAR Sprint Cup race at Phoenix International Raceway as previously scheduled because
of NASCAR's concerns with the Confederate flag on the roof of the car.

"NASCAR, International Speedway Corp. and Phoenix International Raceway officials discussed this
and decided it was not in the best interest of our sport,'' NASCAR said in a statement Friday. "The
image of the Confederate flag is not something that should play an official role in our sport as we
continue to reach out to new fans and make NASCAR more inclusive."

-----------------

Sorry, Bubba.
111 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The General Lee, donning the Confederate flag, barred by NASCAR at March race at PIR (Original Post) Ptah Feb 2012 OP
Umm, why? Ter Feb 2012 #1
No.... CherokeeDem Feb 2012 #4
True, many like the sport who are good people Ter Feb 2012 #6
Apparently they want fans who AREN'T redneaks... reACTIONary Feb 2012 #8
nope rum sod Feb 2012 #26
Here's an informal sample group. Overwhelmingly white and conservative. NASCAR = GOP base. leveymg Feb 2012 #34
You can tell political affiliation from a picture? PavePusher Feb 2012 #56
I've been to NASCAR and lots of other types of motorsports events. leveymg Feb 2012 #62
Stereotyping, one of DU's favorite sports. Sigh. n/t PavePusher Feb 2012 #63
How much are tickets? That'll tell you more about who shows up. Bucky Feb 2012 #94
This sounds like something hatched in a think tank Honest Turtle Feb 2012 #72
Exactly center rising Feb 2012 #16
NASCAR's biggest star is no longer Jeff Gordon jmowreader Feb 2012 #28
just wanted to post a photo of Danica.... IamK Feb 2012 #37
Danica isn't NASCAR's biggest star yet... jmowreader Feb 2012 #73
Dale Jr is a horrible driver IamK Feb 2012 #76
I am absolutely convinced after his father's death that NASCAR rigged Cosmocat Feb 2012 #83
I remember... obietiger Feb 2012 #102
Gorden Cosmocat Feb 2012 #104
I agree... obietiger Feb 2012 #105
Dale Jr. is definitely not his daddy... jmowreader Feb 2012 #93
Princess Sparklepony won't last long...her constant whining about 'the car' being terrible... truebrit71 Feb 2012 #108
Well, if you go by championships, it's Richard Petty and Dale Earnhardt!! center rising Feb 2012 #92
You're correct. It's not just a southern sport. Lugnut Feb 2012 #40
LOL, that's like saying people who watch AMRA or USCA events snooper2 Feb 2012 #109
That flag is evil and SHOULD be banned. It represents slavery and treason. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #10
Do you think the Nazi flag is banned? Should the Japanese flag be banned? The Union Jack? onenote Feb 2012 #13
I think a race car with a nazi flag on it would be rather offensive. Warren Stupidity Feb 2012 #80
And I agree that they shouldn't allow it onenote Feb 2012 #87
Displays of the Nazi flag are banned in Germany n/t dflprincess Feb 2012 #88
Doesn't make it something we should aspire to here. onenote Feb 2012 #89
Yup, they sure are. Major Hogwash Feb 2012 #91
And do you know that reason? RZM Feb 2012 #100
No flag should be banned Kelvin Mace Feb 2012 #14
Burning flags tends to create hostility, not a good idea. Just sayin.... Kurmudgeon Feb 2012 #38
It certainly should not be banned Scootaloo Feb 2012 #32
We should create an "acceptable ideas police" who regulate all flags. Bucky Feb 2012 #95
HUGE difference between leftynyc Feb 2012 #98
Take another look at the thread RZM Feb 2012 #101
Yes, but the point is they say they are trying to expand beyond that. NYC Liberal Feb 2012 #12
There are a shitload of NASCAR fans in NH and ME, and they aren't fans of the stars-n-bars. nt MADem Feb 2012 #18
I can give one good reason why. sofa king Feb 2012 #36
Shame on me . . . R. P. McMurphy Feb 2012 #42
R.E. Lee became president of what was to become Art_from_Ark Feb 2012 #103
good points Roy Rolling Feb 2012 #44
I prefer the German approach. (Did I just say that?) sofa king Feb 2012 #45
Well written comment grantcart Feb 2012 #65
You blame Lee for the deaths? Ter Feb 2012 #75
Damned right I do. sofa king Feb 2012 #77
I made some mistakes up there. sofa king Feb 2012 #84
Here is another way of looking at it. sofa king Feb 2012 #85
you know what? catering to people who fly the confederate flag is not necessary CreekDog Feb 2012 #64
i come from deep southern scots-irish stock (mexican too, but that isnt relevant) arely staircase Feb 2012 #71
Lots of NASCAR fans in the Northeast hack89 Feb 2012 #81
NASCAR races in such redneck/Confederate flag strongholds as New Hampshire, Michigan and SoCal KamaAina Feb 2012 #90
What's a redneckTer? Please define one or two for me. Have you ever been to a NASCAR race? Johnson20 Feb 2012 #99
I think the ones you are thinking of have traded their's in for yellow mmonk Feb 2012 #111
in 20 years, people will be afraid to speak or make eye contact in public nt flexnor Feb 2012 #2
Why is that? Major Hogwash Feb 2012 #3
because flexnor Feb 2012 #5
I take that as a verbal equivalent of not meeting eye contact. caseymoz Feb 2012 #20
Is this the domino theory coming back? Like, if we cant stop communism in Viet Nam rhett o rick Feb 2012 #9
I see this news displeases you. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #15
hey neo-Confederates, provis99 Feb 2012 #7
You can't even wave that flag in a confederate "state" that had civil war battles! boppers Feb 2012 #21
The famed General Lee car? Brother Buzz Feb 2012 #11
And you've got to figure a few hundred idiots with the same type vehicle replicated that offensive MADem Feb 2012 #19
Just Google image it and confirm your suspicions. Caution: BARF alert!!! LOL Brother Buzz Feb 2012 #22
My EYES..... MADem Feb 2012 #25
Re: tvs lasting forever - I had Zenith teevees from the early 60s through the mid 70s... GReedDiamond Feb 2012 #23
We had a Zenith "portable" that was made of metal in the late 50s through the 60s MADem Feb 2012 #24
The kids today don't know what they're missing... GReedDiamond Feb 2012 #27
I'll be honest, I was envious of that kind of "high tech" stuff! MADem Feb 2012 #30
I have a Sony that was (according to the back) built in Japan in 1990 TheCruces Feb 2012 #33
Sad to say, but we now don't make any TVs in this country. Beacool Feb 2012 #50
Yeah, I know, tvs - and a lot of everything else, too...nt GReedDiamond Feb 2012 #74
Someone else brings this up farther down.... mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2012 #106
Just two gold ol' boys, never meanin' no harm. n/t Beartracks Feb 2012 #17
They were supposed to be Jewish? Ikonoklast Feb 2012 #35
pfft...it was no match for the Batmobile, anyway Adenoid_Hynkel Feb 2012 #29
Either vehicle in your post would be a better choice! nt MADem Feb 2012 #31
Good luck keeping Granny strapped to her seat while jumping a canyon though.... Kurmudgeon Feb 2012 #39
I don't agree with displaying the Confederate flag, but that car is an icon. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #41
The Flag ? The Flag !! vitoponzini Feb 2012 #43
Are you saying the pit crews should NOT wear KKK robes and masks? JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2012 #46
I'm native American AwareOne Feb 2012 #47
I believe symbols are interpreted LanternWaste Feb 2012 #96
Political correctness overkill. Beacool Feb 2012 #48
Political correctness is meaningless in this context. It's a brand marketing issue. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #78
Cover the roof with a white sheet. greyl Feb 2012 #49
Just as well Mopar151 Feb 2012 #51
That was my question as well... Blue_Tires Feb 2012 #61
Ya think the graphics guy at the TV studio may have seen Richie's car? Mopar151 Feb 2012 #66
Or, if that is too expensive/rare to use: Blue_Tires Feb 2012 #68
Offical pace car is sponsored by mfr., has lights 'n stuff Mopar151 Feb 2012 #70
Wasting massive amounts of fossil fuels raouldukelives Feb 2012 #52
I drive a '92 Crown Vic unionworks Feb 2012 #53
Why'nt cha go hate on somebody else - or kick the rearview mirror out of your car in solidarity. Mopar151 Feb 2012 #58
No disrespect intended Mopar raouldukelives Feb 2012 #59
Your analysys of elephants vs. circus is correct Mopar151 Feb 2012 #67
I imagine that the same may be said of most Americans on an individual level LanternWaste Feb 2012 #97
Absolutely. The average American is painfully unaware raouldukelives Feb 2012 #110
Millions of Americans died, to take down the confederate flag. Let's leave it down, and out. Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #54
R#17 & K for, this topic reminds of "Slowly I turn, step by step, inch by inch..." UTUSN Feb 2012 #55
I agree, I don't like seeing that flag anywhere eyewall Feb 2012 #57
Yeah, that flag - we should all let it sink treestar Feb 2012 #82
yes, not to mention the "grow up" factor. eyewall Feb 2012 #86
So a klan meet without the hoods? Besides that car Dragonbreathp9d Feb 2012 #60
No, not a Klan function Mopar151 Feb 2012 #69
I'm opposed to the promotion of racism. Warren Stupidity Feb 2012 #79
Awesome - however be prepared for the teabaggers to turn this into a holy war Taverner Feb 2012 #107
 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
1. Umm, why?
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 07:34 PM
Feb 2012

I can understand barring it at every other sporting event, but that flag is pretty much NASCAR's base, isn't it? A huge percentage (not all, I know) are rednecks, and I'm sure many NASCAR fans fly it.

CherokeeDem

(3,709 posts)
4. No....
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 07:51 PM
Feb 2012

the Confederate flag is not NASCAR's base, that is simply a convenient sterotype of those who have no understanding of the sport. NASCAR's fans are from all states and all walks of life.

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
6. True, many like the sport who are good people
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 08:25 PM
Feb 2012

But it is more popular with rednecks on average, then say baseball or football fans. Same thing with bigfoot 4x4 monster truck rallies. What I'm trying to say is 30% or 40% or more of baseball and football fans aren't rednecks. At least that are NASCAR fans.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
62. I've been to NASCAR and lots of other types of motorsports events.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 08:21 PM
Feb 2012

NASCAR is almost uniformly white, conservative and that usually means GOP. Don't try to sh-t us about that.

Bucky

(54,087 posts)
94. How much are tickets? That'll tell you more about who shows up.
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 08:06 AM
Feb 2012

I like to watch Nascar racing on TV, but I don't go to the track.

Honest Turtle

(4 posts)
72. This sounds like something hatched in a think tank
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:32 PM
Feb 2012

Nothing pisses off rednecks more than the theme that we are too PC to allow the confederate flag to be flown. This is even better than that because it is not allowing the General Lee a car many a kid grew up to love to be shown, because of the simple reason it has a rebel flag on top. At the time of the show the confederate flag was not almost solely flown/displayed by hate groups and rednecks as it is now. The flag was more represented as pride in the south and a symbol of rebellion. (or maybe that was what I saw growing up in a conservative Irish Catholic family in the South)

So out of no where suddenly the General Lee can't be used as a pace car and it is big press. This could have all been determined on the down low and no one would have known. But no it is big publicity. We may feel vindicated by Nascar, but we do not gain any votes. The Repubs however gain all the pissed off rednecks, who feel like the General Lee that they grew up with should be able to be a pace car. They feel like the rebel flag on top is just part of the car.

Just my thoughts... I hope no one is offended by them.

center rising

(971 posts)
16. Exactly
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:01 AM
Feb 2012

NASCAR is just not a southern sport anymore. Millions of fans away from the south watch NASCAR, and half the tracks are away from the south. In fact, NASCAR's biggest star Jeff Gordon is from California!!

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
28. NASCAR's biggest star is no longer Jeff Gordon
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:54 AM
Feb 2012

Right now, it's Jimmie Johnson (the driver who won the championship five years running, which no one else has ever done), who is also from California. The other "biggest star" is Tony Stewart, from Rushville, Indiana. (Weirdness: I once had to make a run between two points in the Midwest. I had the choice of three basically equal roads; one went through Rushville, so I took that one just for the hell of it. There's no "Home of Tony Stewart" sign on the main road through Rushville; IIRC there's basically no mention of him, and at the time he had two championships to his name.)

NASCAR's "fan favorite," although he can't win a race to save his life, is Dale Jr., who IS from North Carolina. But you're exactly right, NASCAR is far from being a "Southern" sport now.

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
73. Danica isn't NASCAR's biggest star yet...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:55 PM
Feb 2012

and I have no idea in hell how she became the IRL's biggest star because the woman can't win races to save her life...she's only won one in her career. Cute only gets you so far.

 

IamK

(956 posts)
76. Dale Jr is a horrible driver
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 08:09 AM
Feb 2012

and he is likely the sports "biggest star"... He has had 1 win th the last 6 years....it's all about hype, not performance. She will likely win a race before Dale Jr wins another....

Cosmocat

(14,575 posts)
83. I am absolutely convinced after his father's death that NASCAR rigged
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:42 PM
Feb 2012

race to let Jr. win.

He won most of his races on the big super tracks, and being a the simple minded twit he is, I thought it seemed his car had a little more go to it than others during that time frame ...

I always felt they let them calibrate his car differently than anyone else was under the rules during that time.

obietiger

(500 posts)
102. I remember...
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 07:53 PM
Feb 2012

when folks used to say the same about Jeff Gordon. They said they overlooked things with his car so they could have a "northern" driver be popular.

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
93. Dale Jr. is definitely not his daddy...
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 01:24 AM
Feb 2012

then again, his daddy wasn't his daddy for the last four or five years of his life, since his daddy would go out to qualify with his race engine in the car and he'd wind up starting the show from row 16.

I have sometimes wondered, if NASCAR's one-engine rule had been in effect when Dale Earnhardt was alive, how many more races he would have won.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
108. Princess Sparklepony won't last long...her constant whining about 'the car' being terrible...
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 11:43 AM
Feb 2012

...and fellow drivers being idiots, rather than admitting that she ran out of talent right after graduating from Toyota Atlantics (where she didn't manage to win EITHER) will wear out her welcome real quick..I have much more respect for women racers like Katherine Legge, who get respect because they can be competitive rather than having to resort to taking their clothes off...

Lugnut

(9,791 posts)
40. You're correct. It's not just a southern sport.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:23 AM
Feb 2012

In fact there are more drivers from states other than those in the south.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
109. LOL, that's like saying people who watch AMRA or USCA events
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 12:12 PM
Feb 2012

come from all walks of life...

Sure you may have the odd case here and there, but for the most part um- no LOL


I think DU needs a lesson on stereotypes again-

All stereotypes are true, except... I: What are stereotypes?

Stereotypes” have a bad name, and everybody hates stereotypes. But what exactly is a stereotype?

What people call “stereotypes” are what scientists call “empirical generalizations,” and they are the foundation of scientific theory. That’s what scientists do; they make generalizations. Many stereotypes are empirical generalizations with a statistical basis and thus on average tend to be true. If they are not true, they wouldn’t be stereotypes. The only problem with stereotypes and empirical generalizations is that they are not always true for all individual cases. They are generalizations, not invariant laws. There are always individual exceptions to stereotypes and empirical generalizations. The danger lies in applying the empirical generalizations to individual cases, which may or may not be exceptions. But these individual exceptions do not invalidate the generalizations.

An observation, if true, becomes an empirical generalization until someone objects to it, and then it becomes a stereotype. For example, the statement “Men are taller than women” is an empirical generalization. It is in general true, but there are individual exceptions. There are many men who are shorter than the average woman, and there are many women who are taller than the average man, but these exceptions do not make the generalization untrue. Men on average are taller than women in every human society (and, by the way, there are evolutionary psychological explanations for this phenomenon, known as the sexual dimorphism in size, but that’s perhaps for a future post). Everybody knows this, but nobody calls it a stereotype because it is not unkind to anybody. Men in general like being taller than women, and women in general like being shorter than men.

However, as soon as one turns this around and makes a slightly different, yet equally true, observation that “Women are fatter than men,” it becomes a stereotype because nobody, least of all women, wants to be considered fat. But it is true nonetheless; women have a higher percentage of body fat than men throughout the life course (and there are evolutionary reasons for this as well). Once again, there are numerous individual exceptions, but the generalization still holds true at the population level.

more-
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200804/all-stereotypes-are-true-except-i-what-are-stereotypes


Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
10. That flag is evil and SHOULD be banned. It represents slavery and treason.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:38 PM
Feb 2012

It is little different from the Nazi flag.

onenote

(42,779 posts)
13. Do you think the Nazi flag is banned? Should the Japanese flag be banned? The Union Jack?
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 10:17 PM
Feb 2012

One of the things that is best about this country is that we don't generally go around banning flags.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
80. I think a race car with a nazi flag on it would be rather offensive.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:16 PM
Feb 2012

I suspect NASCAR would not allow that either.

onenote

(42,779 posts)
87. And I agree that they shouldn't allow it
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 10:00 PM
Feb 2012

NASCAR deciding not to allow Nazi, Confederate or any other flag is NASCAR's decision. Its a far far different thing than the government banning those flags or any other flag.

onenote

(42,779 posts)
89. Doesn't make it something we should aspire to here.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 10:41 PM
Feb 2012

Certain types of satire also are actionable under German law -- the satirical ad that Hustler ran about Jerry Falwell's "first time" would probably have been actionable in Germany but, thankfully, it was deemed protected by the First Amendment in this country.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
100. And do you know that reason?
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 07:18 PM
Feb 2012

It's because the Allies wanted to make sure the Nazi party had zero chance of ever coming back. That meant not only banning the party, but its symbols as well. It wasn't so much about the legacies of Nazi crimes against humanity (although that played a role), but more about the political future of Germany. And it was the right call. You don't want to have to deal with the same enemy twice.

We did the same thing in Iraq too, BTW. The Ba'ath Party is banned by name in the Iraqi Constitution. In fact, it's banned under any other name too. There's a clause that effectively says nothing resembling the Ba'ath Party can be legal under Iraqi law. Same logic there. It's not because Saddam was a bad guy, it's to prevent his crew from coming back to power.

But that's not how we get down here. We won the civil war and ended the threat to the Union without having to permanently abrogate freedom of speech.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
14. No flag should be banned
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:47 PM
Feb 2012

and any flag should be burned if folks feel like it. As long as they own the flag, that is...

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
32. It certainly should not be banned
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 05:37 AM
Feb 2012

It makes for a VERY useful method of picking dumbfucks out of a crowd. it works like this.

Is there someone in a crowd sporting a confederate flag?
If so, that person is a dumbfuck.

See? Simple! Easy! And it doesn't even cost you $19.95! That's right, our dumbfuck identification system is yours, absolutely free!

Bucky

(54,087 posts)
95. We should create an "acceptable ideas police" who regulate all flags.
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 08:09 AM
Feb 2012

I mean, it's like that snake is daring me to tread on it. It's secretly pro-oppression. We should ban that too.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
98. HUGE difference between
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 04:10 PM
Feb 2012

NASCAR banning a confederate or nazi flag and the government doing it. I don't see anyone here advocating the government banning a flag (even one that represents treason).

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
101. Take another look at the thread
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 07:21 PM
Feb 2012

There are people here arguing it should be banned. Not many, but they are there.

NYC Liberal

(20,137 posts)
12. Yes, but the point is they say they are trying to expand beyond that.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 10:12 PM
Feb 2012

And allowing this wouldn't help.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
18. There are a shitload of NASCAR fans in NH and ME, and they aren't fans of the stars-n-bars. nt
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:43 AM
Feb 2012

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
36. I can give one good reason why.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:02 AM
Feb 2012

While it's certainly true that Robert E. Lee was likely responsible for more American deaths than just about anyone, at the end of the war he gave his word that he would fight no more, would encourage others to do the same, would not permit soldiers under his command to slip off to the Blue Ridge to fight a long and costly guerrilla war, and then devoted the rest of his life to education, rebuilding, and reconciliation.

Thereafter, he never displayed that flag, nor allowed it to be displayed on his campus; never again wore badges of rank and insignia (even though he had only three coats, and one of them was his old general's jacket); never permitted his students to form ranks or perform maneuvers even in joint student-cadet events on the next-door VMI parade ground (and even though most of the students were veterans of the war), and otherwise totally devoted his life to peace and the betterment of the youths whose job it would be to rebuild. Lee's commitment to peace effectively spiked the machinations of a dozen of his subordinate generals in Virginia alone, including a nephew and two sons.

So tacking that person's name to that beautiful, hideous muscle-car and that flag does all of us a disservice, because it deliberately forgets the most important thing Robert E. Lee ever did, which was to surrender that flag, and to use his influence to stop the killing.

The problem is that absolutely nobody remembers or cares about that subtle point. Once again, Americans worship the flag-flying Robert E. Lee, the one whose brilliance led directly to the deaths of some 200,000 Americans on Virginia soil alone.

Keep that up and see where it gets us.

R. P. McMurphy

(837 posts)
42. Shame on me . . .
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:56 AM
Feb 2012

and my ignorance on this subject. I did not know this about Robert E. Lee. Thank you for this informative post.

Roy Rolling

(6,941 posts)
44. good points
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:27 PM
Feb 2012

Very informative. But the issue on how to handle things like this remains. Making the flag into a hate symbol perpetuates the conflict, ignoring it makes it lose its power.

Morons who want to fly the flag to resurrect the conflict are the problem, and that is where the opposition should be directed without hampering the educational value of free speech.

For example, if my neightbor wants to hang a Nazi flag it is his right. But if he wants to recruit others to resurrect what the flag represents then action is appropriate. Society must know how to separate free speech from incitement to violence.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
45. I prefer the German approach. (Did I just say that?)
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:37 PM
Feb 2012

They of course have a similar problem, but they consider the very symbol to be an incitement to violence.

If I had my way, I would treat the battle-flag--and its siblings, all of which have found their way into various state flags and onto bumper stickers--as what it is, a symbol of oppression and an incitement to violence.

And I would remind those who wish to wave it that their own God-on-earth felt the same damned way.

Edit: In spite of what the Dukes of Hazzard would have us believe.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
65. Well written comment
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 09:48 PM
Feb 2012

He knew the war was a mistake. He didn't support slavery or seccession which made his decision to lead the army against the constitutional government all the more difficult to understand.

Lee's life is the ultimate Shakesperean tragedy of misplaced loyalty. If he had only given his ultimate loyalty to his true country and not to the state legislators in Virginia that only reluctantly agreed to seccession, many thinking it would lead to a negotiated settlement.



 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
75. You blame Lee for the deaths?
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 03:28 AM
Feb 2012

Nothing rests on the guy in the WH who did nothing to prevent the war?

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
77. Damned right I do.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 10:58 AM
Feb 2012

Nobody else was offered the general-in-chief position of both armies, Federal and Confederate. So nobody else had the opportunity to choose a side and lend what we can now see was an unequaled talent for command at the top.

When Joseph E. Johnston was wounded at Seven Pines, Federal forces were around ten miles from Richmond and steadily advancing. Robert E. Lee got the job as Johnston's replacement because there was almost nobody else on hand with the seniority, the experience, and the Virginia credentials needed to lead the Confederate forces in Virginia.

After that, Lee commanded in twelve battles that would have filled a football stadium's stands with combatants, and in every one of them more Americans died than at Pearl Harbor. Virtually all of those single battles had more American casualties than our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Gulf War and the Spanish-American war combined.

Five of them killed or wounded twenty thousand Americans in three days or less. This at a time when the population of the United States in 1860 was one-tenth what it is today, so you can add a zero to each of those casualty totals to get an idea of what a comparable disaster would be like today.

By my guess, had Lee lost any one of of the following battles: Second Manassass, Antietam, Chancellorsville, the Wilderness, Spostylvania, Cold Harbor, or the non-battle at Mine Run (well over 100,000 total casualties, by the way), there was a clear and simple way for the United States to go on to win the war in a matter of days or weeks.

Lee's army was the only thing protecting the entire political framework of the Confederacy, about 40% of all the food the Confederacy ate, about 40% of all the salt the Confederacy needed, about 40% of all the black powder made in the Confederacy, virtually all of the heavy weapons manufacturing and most of the rifles, its shipbuilding industry, and a disproportionate percentage of the fledgling nation's railroad mileage. When Lee finally did lose, the war drew to a close within two months.

So hell yeah, I blame Lee. These are just some of the things Lee could have done to save lives and change the course of history:

* He could have sat the war out and not lent his skills to the side that desperately needed him. (The one guy who graduated ahead of Lee at West Point did just that.) Incompetent generals outnumbered good ones in the Confederate army by many times. The chances that a Magruder, Huger, or Whiting would have weaseled his way to the top--and quickly lost the war--were good without Lee in the mix.

* He could have accepted the invitation to prosecute the war against the South, and probably made the war shorter.

* He could have explored the possibility of peace terms upon taking command after Seven Pines.

* He could have been less adept at killing, lost any one of the battles I mentioned above, and concluded the war six months to two and a half years earlier than it did.

* He could have made known his early assessment that the war could not be won--he was kicking it about in his notes in mid-1862, nearly three years before the war ended--and encouraged the Confederates to sue for peace.

So hell yes, that guy has more American blood on his hands than any other figure in history. More than Emperor Hirohito, more than King George III, more than Hitler. His attempt at reconciliation is the most important thing he did.

And what the fuck does it matter now when we've collectively decided to forget that most important part? He's just a killer now.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
84. I made some mistakes up there.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:00 PM
Feb 2012

This sentence is incorrect:

Virtually all of those single battles had more American casualties than our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Gulf War and the Spanish-American war combined.

Forgive me, that's just wrong. What I meant to say was deaths, not casualties, which include killed, wounded, and missing. But even then the 5000 or so Americans who died in those other wars outnumber all but the most sanguine Civil War battles. If one takes into account the fact that the five-year survival rate for a wounded Civil War soldier was very poor, while that of a modern American soldier is quite good, then maybe.

This does not otherwise diminish the scope of the tragedy wrought by the Civil War and brought to its highest pitch by Robert E. Lee in particular.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
85. Here is another way of looking at it.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:47 PM
Feb 2012

On the outskirts of Richmond in June, 1862, Joseph E. Johnston was in the process of getting beat in exactly the same way he was whipped by Sherman in 1864 (Jeff Davis still had no confidence in Johnston's ability to defend a city in 1864, and replaced him with John B. Hood, who promptly lost Atlanta).

McClellan was on the verge of being able to use his superior numbers and firepower to "advance by position," as I believe Lee put it, under the cover of his heavy artillery.

So at that time, going from what we know actually did happen in 1865 when the Union finally did succeed in invading Virginia and taking Richmond, the war was two months away from potentially ending when Johnston was wounded.

Johnston knew his wounding was beneficial to the South: "No sir! The shot that struck me down is the very best that has been fired for the Southern cause yet. For I possess in no degree the confidence of our government, and now they have in my place one who does possess it (R.E. Lee), and who can accomplish what I never could have done--the concentration of our armies for the defence of the capital of the Confederacy." (Freeman, Lee's Lieutenants, v. 1, p. 264)

The political importance of Richmond paled in comparison to the strategic, geographic, and economic importance it carried for the entire Confederacy--that is why the capital was moved there in 1861 (in part to ensure that the legislators would be close enough to the war zone to feel a sense of urgency).

Defending Richmond successfully, as Lee did for three summers running, is what kept the South in the war. No other part of the Confederacy was indispensable, as Johnston and Sherman proved. Only Lee's defense of Virginia allowed that war to continue.

So Lee deserves credit not only for all of the deaths in the bloodiest theater of the war, his own, but he also deserves credit for all of the Civil War deaths which occurred subsequent to his accession to command of the Army of Northern Virginia.

Going from that line of reasoning, about one percent of all Americans alive before the war died because Robert E. Lee was so damned good at what he did.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
64. you know what? catering to people who fly the confederate flag is not necessary
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 08:50 PM
Feb 2012

that shouldn't need to be said, but well, some people leave me thinking that often.


arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
71. i come from deep southern scots-irish stock (mexican too, but that isnt relevant)
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:24 PM
Feb 2012

my great-great grandfather was on the confederate side at vicksburgh. he owned no slaves, but fought for "the cause". whatever happened to him in that dreadfull seige affected him for life. nevertheless, i see that banner at worst as the klan flag and at best the discredited banner of a defeated slaveocracy. no my ancestor owned no slaves - but the poor always do the fighting for the rich. i doubt many american soldiers killed in iraq owned oil wells or stock in halliburton.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
81. Lots of NASCAR fans in the Northeast
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:19 PM
Feb 2012

they hold a big race every year in New Hampshire. My father in law live on Cape Cod his entire life has was a huge fan.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
90. NASCAR races in such redneck/Confederate flag strongholds as New Hampshire, Michigan and SoCal
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:30 PM
Feb 2012


they even have a road race here in the Bay Area, for Pete's sake.
 

Johnson20

(315 posts)
99. What's a redneckTer? Please define one or two for me. Have you ever been to a NASCAR race?
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 05:44 PM
Feb 2012

Personally, I don't like to define people by their color.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
111. I think the ones you are thinking of have traded their's in for yellow
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 06:00 AM
Feb 2012

don't tread on me flags.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
20. I take that as a verbal equivalent of not meeting eye contact.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:58 AM
Feb 2012

Gee, you were right. Just off by twenty years.
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
9. Is this the domino theory coming back? Like, if we cant stop communism in Viet Nam
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:22 PM
Feb 2012

it will take over the world.

Brother Buzz

(36,478 posts)
11. The famed General Lee car?
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:43 PM
Feb 2012

Although the estimated number of General Lees used varies from different sources, according to Ben Jones ("Cooter" in the show), as well as builders involved with the show, 256 General Lees were used to film the series. Others claim about 321 were used in the series. Approximately seventeen still exist in various states of repair.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
19. And you've got to figure a few hundred idiots with the same type vehicle replicated that offensive
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:49 AM
Feb 2012

paint scheme while that program was popular.

I could probably count on the thumb of one hand the number of times I watched that program from start to finish. I do remember the opening credits well, because back then, I would have to haul my tired ass out of the chair and stumble over to the television set to change the channel, if there was no one around who would respond to my "Turn this shit off" request (we didn't get remotes until the mid eighties...we tend to wear out/use shit up, and our old color tvs lasted forever).

MADem

(135,425 posts)
25. My EYES.....
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:36 AM
Feb 2012

A Smart Car in the paint scheme? A lawn mower? A Halloween costume--a wearable vehicle, in essence? And page after page .... gaaaah!

GReedDiamond

(5,317 posts)
23. Re: tvs lasting forever - I had Zenith teevees from the early 60s through the mid 70s...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:21 AM
Feb 2012

...which I got from my stepfather, who was the lead electronics engineer for Zenith from the mid-50s into the mid-70s.

When I was growing up, we had state of the art Zenith tvs in all bedrooms and the living room.

As an eight year old in 1963, I had the Zenith "Space Command" remote control tv set in my room.

None of the Zenith tvs I had, from black & white to color, ever failed.

Wherever they are now, excepting if in the landfill, they probably still work.

"The Quality Goes In Before The Name Goes On"



Oh yeah, regarding the OP, the 1 percenter with one of the too-many-to-document "General Lee" cars should just offer the NASCAR folks an extra million or two, and he'd be able to complete his fantasy.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
24. We had a Zenith "portable" that was made of metal in the late 50s through the 60s
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:31 AM
Feb 2012

It weighed a ton, but it worked like a champ for over a decade--black and white of course, no remote. We had an RCA "console" color TV with a slightly rounded screen; that damn thing didn't die until the mid-eighties! I probably could have fixed it, but I wanted a remote. None of our TVs came with one!

GReedDiamond

(5,317 posts)
27. The kids today don't know what they're missing...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:46 AM
Feb 2012

...the idea of really great, compelling black & white teevee shows is crazy, I tell ya!

So sorry you did not have the "Space Command"


MADem

(135,425 posts)
30. I'll be honest, I was envious of that kind of "high tech" stuff!
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 04:18 AM
Feb 2012

There were a lot of us, though and that kind of luxury was out of our familial financial reach. Owing to the fact that we were international nomads for a while, we spent chunks of time without television at all (or having to rely on the TV of friends while in Europe) and as a consequence, we always glommed onto it when we had the opportunity!

TheCruces

(224 posts)
33. I have a Sony that was (according to the back) built in Japan in 1990
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 06:03 AM
Feb 2012

The thing still works great. It's a 32"...it is heavy as hell. I actually got it because I moved into a third floor apartment and the previous tenant said she wasn't going to attempt moving it downstairs. It was definitely a nightmare getting it out when I moved.

It almost got left behind, but with a bit of redneck ingenuity, a big Coleman cooler on wheels, a jump rope and some bungee cord, we got it down.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,656 posts)
106. Someone else brings this up farther down....
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 10:21 AM
Feb 2012

In the kitchen, I still watch a 10" GE color set from the late 70s or early 80s. It was built in the Hampton Roads area of Virginia. It needs a convergence. Your stepfather would have known what that meant; it's an adjustment of the circuit driving the picture tube. No problem, as there's a copy of the TV's schematic included with the set, in a little box on the inside.

I have a digital converter box attached to it, so it brings in everything I need to see. One knob is for UHF and another for VHF, but it's set for keeps on channel 4 now.

My first TV was a 19" black and white tube-type Zenith, which I bought in the fall of 1969.

Best wishes.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
35. They were supposed to be Jewish?
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 09:56 AM
Feb 2012

Wow, learn sumpin' new every day!


I can just hear their mother now, "When are you two going to stop jumping that facacta car around, finish medical school, meet some nice girls and make me a grandmother?"

"And your cousin always was such a tramp, just like her mother."

 

Adenoid_Hynkel

(14,093 posts)
29. pfft...it was no match for the Batmobile, anyway
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 04:02 AM
Feb 2012

I think even the Beverly Hillbillies' truck could outrun it.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
41. I don't agree with displaying the Confederate flag, but that car is an icon.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:25 AM
Feb 2012

It wouldn't be the General Lee without the flag. How is it different from the two cars from The Munsters or the Back to the Future DeLorean? I actually agree with their concern, but that was one kick ass car, flag or not, and to have the original is pretty awesome - especially if it still runs. And how the hell are you going to make NASCAR more inclusive when the majority of the fans boycott "The Dixie Chicks"???

vitoponzini

(1 post)
43. The Flag ? The Flag !!
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:15 PM
Feb 2012
This battle to display the Confederate flag here or there that brings battle cries from both sides just keeps throwing gasoline on the fire which should as years go by where both sides should draw a line in the sand , duke it out and may the best man win.

Those that have the position to ban the Confederate flag should do a little more investigation of the flags "TRUE" history and also investigate and bring forth to the general public there are other symbols from fraternal groups that have a impact on race relations.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,372 posts)
46. Are you saying the pit crews should NOT wear KKK robes and masks?
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:42 PM
Feb 2012

The "true" history of the flag is no longer relevant. it is now linked to ideas of white supremacy, at least in enough minds that NASCAR wants to avoid it.

On the General Lee, it's nothing that a can of orange paint can't fix.

Edit to add: That "line in the sand" thing, that was done about 150 years ago. And welcome to DU III.






 

AwareOne

(404 posts)
47. I'm native American
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:52 PM
Feb 2012

and I insist that the American flag be banned from all events as it is a symbol of geoncide against my people. Anyone who displays that flag is a hate filled racist bigot.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
96. I believe symbols are interpreted
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 03:48 PM
Feb 2012

I believe symbols are interpreted as such by demographics rather than mere individuals.

"Anyone who displays that flag is a hate filled racist bigot..." And if the time comes in which American demographics dictate that the US flag is indeed racist and bigoted, we may begin that national conversation...

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
48. Political correctness overkill.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:56 PM
Feb 2012

I understand the objection of many people when it comes to flying the Confederate flag in a state's capitol building, but on the General Lee at a NASCAR event????

Please........





"The General Lee" sung by Johnny Cash

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
78. Political correctness is meaningless in this context. It's a brand marketing issue.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:25 AM
Feb 2012

NASCAR is distancing itself from a symbol of the Confederacy probably because its marketing data show that identifying with only that region will inhibit their ability to expand the fan base.

Mopar151

(10,002 posts)
51. Just as well
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:16 PM
Feb 2012

The association of the Confederate flag with this movie/TV car is unfortunate at best - The Stars and Bars is not the reason this car is an icon to kids of all ages, but it's a good reason to de-emphasize the association with NASCAR. It's not just "political correctness", either - there are hundreds of historically significant cars around that would be more suitable as pace cars, especially given the NASCAR Hall of Fame starting up. To a true NASCAR fan, this would be far cooler than an oft-copied and cloned TV/movie car

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
61. That was my question as well...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 06:35 PM
Feb 2012

There are countless examples of REAL, easy-to-obtain historic stock cars that would have been a better idea...

The General Lee has as much to do with NASCAR as Herbie or Christine or K.I.T.T. or ChittyChittyBangBang

Mopar151

(10,002 posts)
66. Ya think the graphics guy at the TV studio may have seen Richie's car?
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 09:55 PM
Feb 2012

Predated the "General Lee" by a decade or so. The "NY Snowplow Orange" #61 is more of an icon to a generation of NASCAR fans than the faked-up TV car.
If it's gotta be an orange Dodge Charger driven by a nail-tough redneck and prepared by a canny wizard - I nominate the #71 K&K Dodge driven by Bobby Issac and massaged by Harry Hyde.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
68. Or, if that is too expensive/rare to use:
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:30 PM
Feb 2012

You can get something pretty close to authentic here dirt cheap, (relatively speaking): http://www.hscrs.com/home.php

Or god forbid GM/Ford/Dodge/Toyota would step up with an offering from their historic collections (or new car showroom)

I also laugh at the reporter calling it "the famed General Lee"...Years ago I read somewhere that on average an episode shoot of Dukes of Hazzard would destroy FOUR Chargers....

The irony is had Watson tried this in Richmond or Martinsville, no one would have batted an eyebrow...Hell, our governor and senate candidates would have asked to ride shotgun...

How have you been, anyway? Been keeping the rubber side down?

Mopar151

(10,002 posts)
70. Offical pace car is sponsored by mfr., has lights 'n stuff
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:19 PM
Feb 2012

Usually driven by an ex-pro, is out for all cautions, etc. "Ceremonial" pace cars make a couple laps, go hide in the trailer again.

Penthouse to outhouse for me, just like usual. Too broke to run my own car, wrenching for my buddies - look in the motorsports group for video.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
52. Wasting massive amounts of fossil fuels
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:21 PM
Feb 2012

Driving in circles. Knowing what we now know. You'd really have to bear a grudge against nature to enjoy an event like that. Either that or be painfully oblivious to the legacy they are leaving to the planet.
Yeah, it's the latter.

 

unionworks

(3,574 posts)
53. I drive a '92 Crown Vic
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:32 PM
Feb 2012

with a police pursuit v-8, frame on construction, union made. Why? Because these were built as fleet vehicles, they last twice the length of the life of an ordinary car, and cost half as much to repair. The trade off is in fuel economy. With the employment situation here in Pa, I can't afford expensive car repairs or having to replace the automotive version of a disposable lighter every few years.

Mopar151

(10,002 posts)
58. Why'nt cha go hate on somebody else - or kick the rearview mirror out of your car in solidarity.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:22 PM
Feb 2012

The rearview mirror was developed to save the weight of a riding mechanic, and was instrumental in winning the 1st Indy 500. Look, much as you would like to make racers and fans out to be some sort of orcs, we're really not - think of this as science fair for car geeks.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
59. No disrespect intended Mopar
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:53 PM
Feb 2012

I may be a certified nut. I feel the same way about most sporting events these days. Loading planes full of people to fly around the country and stick balls in holes or spike them in end zones is great entertainment but at a certain point it becomes unsustainable.
For me it all comes down to if I believe in Climate science or I don't. Since I do I also believe we haven't seen the effects of pollution created from 1970 to our present day. I have a bad feeling about it. I hope it's all rainbows but I have a sickening feeling it's not going to be pretty.
Faced with that knowledge and imho, anything that isn't being done to help the children of tomorrow breathe a breath of fresh air or be able to enjoy a place like Yosemite in something other than a book is an act of cruelty against them and nature.
Believe me I'd much rather live in a world where what we do to it doesn't matter. The world my ancestors lived in where industry for the sake of industry was a blessing. Most people in the world still live that way. So, may be a nut but it's what I believe to be the truth and my moral compass has to point me this way.

Mopar151

(10,002 posts)
67. Your analysys of elephants vs. circus is correct
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:21 PM
Feb 2012

It ain't what the elephants eat, its movin' the circus around that costs. Racing is not a lot better or worse than other sports in this regard, whether on the national stage or at the local participant level - golf and fishing would be good examples.

And racing is where engineers go to get their freak on. Our sport gives back, and has since it's inception. Technology may let us share the circus around with less cost and a smaller live crowd, and we should pursue that. But we can't let perfect be the enemy of better, and folks love to come out and see the lions.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
97. I imagine that the same may be said of most Americans on an individual level
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 04:01 PM
Feb 2012

I imagine that the same may be said of most Americans on an individual level as we have air conditioning, deep freezers, heating, computers, etc...

US energy usage - 389 watts per person
Democratic Republic of Congo energy usage - 10 watts per person

I imagine that a citizen of Congo would describe you in much the same manner you described NASCAR (our citizen from Congo says of you, "are painfully oblivious to the legacy you are leaving to the planet.&quot .

Unless of course we then begin to justify and rationalize the excesses of our own usage, and in doing so, hold others to a higher standard than we hold ourselves.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
110. Absolutely. The average American is painfully unaware
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 02:50 PM
Feb 2012

of the consequences of their actions. Whether it be cheering on Wall St gains which only equal a further drain on the worlds resources and it's environment through rampant speculation or driving Hummers with "Keep Tahoe Blue" stickers on them in the Sierra and wondering why it isn't snowing like it used to.
I feel for the Congo. As much as a heartless American can at least. I see the diminishing jungle and loss of species and have to sit knowing that it was our excesses of the 20th century that helped make it all possible. As it continues today with strip mining the land for rare minerals for our beloved Foxconn gadgets.
At least our captains of industry of old could claim ignorance of the effects of massive pollution and destruction of nature.
At the end of the day at least we as individuals can say we tried to stand against the tide of selfishness and greed in our own feeble way.

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
54. Millions of Americans died, to take down the confederate flag. Let's leave it down, and out.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:38 PM
Feb 2012

Millions of good soldiers died to end the confederracy and slavery. The confederacy, and slavery, were a horrible thing. And those who continue to fly the confederate flag, or to display it prominently, are an outrage, and an insult to humanity.

This flag and those who stood for it, were defeated in one of the most costly wars America ever took (proportionately). And for many years, flying this, the enemy flag, was rightly made illegal.

Probably? Prominently displaying it, in any positive light, should still be illegal today as well. It is the flag of an illegal insurgency.

It should be banned. In the same way that flying the Nazi flag is illegal in Germany.

eyewall

(674 posts)
57. I agree, I don't like seeing that flag anywhere
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 02:44 PM
Feb 2012

NASCAR will probably provoke a movement of "The South Shall Rise Again" assholes, and fuel all of the anti-politically correct sentiment, in spite of their good intentions.

They're probably still smarting over the Joe the Camel wars.

edit: I should add, I would never have thought of this, or expected it. I consider that car to be a TV show prop and I know the show was very popular, so the flap seems a bit contrived.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
82. Yeah, that flag - we should all let it sink
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:24 PM
Feb 2012

"The South shall rise again" assholes need to know they are fringe cultists, not think they are getting somewhere.

It's a matter of taste and judgment.

Mopar151

(10,002 posts)
69. No, not a Klan function
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:43 PM
Feb 2012

Most of the supremacist faithful are far too paranoid and socially dysfunctional to get near a major sporting event. Posession of a Confederate flag by some drunks in the infield does'nt mean the suits are any less image conscious, or more racist, than any other "sport"

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The General Lee, donning ...