Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:37 PM Feb 2012

States attack ‘Obamacare’ with birth control bills

http://bangordailynews.com/2012/02/17/news/nation/states-attack-obamacare-with-birth-control-bills/

BOISE, Idaho — Republican lawmakers in a handful of states are opening another front in the war against President Obama’s health care overhaul, seizing on the hot-button issue of birth control with bills that would allow insurance companies to ignore new federal rules requiring them to cover contraception.

Measures introduced recently in Idaho, Missouri and Arizona would go beyond religious nonprofits and expand exemptions to secular insurers or businesses that object to covering contraception, abortion and sterilization.

“In its present state, the health care bill is an affront to my religious freedoms,” said Idaho Republican Rep. Carlos Bilbao, who is sponsoring the bill.

The ACLU counters, saying such bills discriminate against women.

<more>
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
States attack ‘Obamacare’ with birth control bills (Original Post) jpak Feb 2012 OP
He doesn't have the right to impose his religious views on someone else's religious freedom either. shraby Feb 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author benld74 Feb 2012 #9
Good, I am glad they are doing this Bjorn Against Feb 2012 #2
BilBao's religious freedoms are an affront to reason.... mike_c Feb 2012 #3
WTF? drm604 Feb 2012 #4
know what is sad? SemperEadem Feb 2012 #8
We fought and got these rights before lunatica Feb 2012 #27
that's how it works in America SemperEadem Feb 2012 #31
religious freedom means having the right to impose his beliefs on others? AlbertCat Feb 2012 #22
Idiot. silverweb Feb 2012 #5
the insurance companies are going to love this... madrchsod Feb 2012 #6
exactly how does the ACA impact your religious freedom? SemperEadem Feb 2012 #7
I think you just coined a phrase, "The Republican Taliban." Sounds right to me. Next thing you juajen Feb 2012 #13
Aspirin will be sewn into the fabric... Beartracks Feb 2012 #16
dont' forget SemperEadem Feb 2012 #23
do insurance companies cover viagra? AmandaRuth Feb 2012 #10
Also, would the birth control bans apply to vasectomies? chimpymustgo Feb 2012 #26
The Constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion eyewall Feb 2012 #11
So tell me, what's the position on Viagra? Cherchez la Femme Feb 2012 #12
Because you're quite on the mark. SemperEadem Feb 2012 #24
They are ALL Lyinng Cowards BadGimp Feb 2012 #14
His religious freedom extends to curtailing others' freedoms? Beartracks Feb 2012 #15
Ol' Carlos' approval numbers probably just jumped fifteen points jmowreader Feb 2012 #17
Carlos Bilao Is An Affront To My Religion DallasNE Feb 2012 #18
I'm kinda with the Republicans on this one... ejbr Feb 2012 #19
We'll see how the health care bill "affronts" their religious freedom when Vinca Feb 2012 #20
you know, I wouldn't be surprised SemperEadem Feb 2012 #25
Hopefully women in these states BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #21
OUTLAW ORAL SEX Iliyah Feb 2012 #28
How's that gonna work out for the knuckledraggers? sofa king Feb 2012 #29
His "religious freedoms" involve imposing them on others? uppityperson Feb 2012 #30
States attack ‘Obamacare’ with birth control pills??? truthisfreedom Feb 2012 #32

shraby

(21,946 posts)
1. He doesn't have the right to impose his religious views on someone else's religious freedom either.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:40 PM
Feb 2012

Response to shraby (Reply #1)

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
2. Good, I am glad they are doing this
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:44 PM
Feb 2012

Let them expose theimselves, the vast majority of the public supports birth control and attacking birth control is going to wake a lot of people up to their agenda. If they want to fight this issue we are all more than happy to fight back.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
4. WTF?
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:48 PM
Feb 2012

He actually believes that religious freedom means having the right to impose his beliefs on others?

Fine. If the Republicans want to lose the female vote, that's their right. They should go right ahead and continue with this nonsense and lose elections because of it.

Then they can rant all they want but be powerless to force themselves on others. Fine by me.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
8. know what is sad?
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 10:25 PM
Feb 2012

there are a lot of thug women who are on the same side of this issue as he is. They will vote against their own best interests.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
27. We fought and got these rights before
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:13 AM
Feb 2012

There aren't enough women on the other side just like there weren't when these rights were first won. And now there are a lot of younger women who took these rights for granted because they had the rights, but they aren't giving those rights up either. That's not how it works in the Western world.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
31. that's how it works in America
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 05:53 PM
Feb 2012

where women exist who will vote against their own interests whether one wants to believe it or not. The rest of the western world I have way more faith in.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
22. religious freedom means having the right to impose his beliefs on others?
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 09:25 AM
Feb 2012

His religious freedom is an affront to my religious freedom...

so I don't have to pay for his salary or pension or perks... right?

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
5. Idiot.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:49 PM
Feb 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]What he calls and "affront" is to his religious sensibilities and has nothing at all to do with his freedoms, since he's still perfectly free to not purchase or use birth control -- just as every other person is still (currently) free to use or not use it according to their convictions.

What he and these other reTHUG goons want is to impose their sensibilities on other people's (women's) freedoms.

Anyone who doesn't know the difference between "sensibilities" and "freedoms" doesn't belong in public office.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
6. the insurance companies are going to love this...
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:51 PM
Feb 2012

birth control pills are far cheaper than covering medical expense of hospital costs and the further costs of a woman having a baby. it`s cheaper for employers if fewer women have babies and the related cost of time off of work and fmla.

most if not all insurance companies offer a certain amount of standard policies across a wide range of employers. the exemptions would cost everyone more money.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
7. exactly how does the ACA impact your religious freedom?
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 10:21 PM
Feb 2012

is someone forcing you to take viagra against your will or something?

how does me being in charge of my reproductive processes for my own body infringe on you being able to say "thank you jesus"? How does it keep you chained to a radiator on sunday morning when you want to go to church, exactly?

what give you the right to weigh in on what is not fit for you to weigh in on when it comes to any woman you did not sire or marry?

the next illogical step on this crusade to strip adult American women of their right to self determination/autonomy? Ramming laws through congress to force women out of the work place and back into the home where all we do is act as breeding machines.

Just how does their vision of rights of american women differ from those of the Taliban?

juajen

(8,515 posts)
13. I think you just coined a phrase, "The Republican Taliban." Sounds right to me. Next thing you
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:30 PM
Feb 2012

know, they'll be bombing statues they don't approve of and designing burkas for us poor misguided women to wear. What in the world is going on in our country, or is it just "their" country?

Beartracks

(12,814 posts)
16. Aspirin will be sewn into the fabric...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:31 AM
Feb 2012

... so you can press on it with your knees.

==========================

AmandaRuth

(3,105 posts)
10. do insurance companies cover viagra?
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 10:57 PM
Feb 2012

why no outcry against that? why is it ok for men to get drugs to get a stiffie and it is not ok for women to get drugs to protect against the natural outcome of that stiffie. What, are women supposed to have children every nine months? What are we, breeding cows now?

eyewall

(674 posts)
11. The Constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:17 PM
Feb 2012

DEMANDS that laws like this not be passed. You cannot legislate a specific religion's rules into law. You cannot impose some state legislator's religious beliefs on everyone. It's Un-American, Un-Constitional, Anti-Woman, Superstitious, and Pathologically Dellusional!

or... republican.

Cherchez la Femme

(2,488 posts)
12. So tell me, what's the position on Viagra?
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:21 PM
Feb 2012

Why do I get the feeling there's gonna be no problem to getting prescriptions & access for that?

BadGimp

(4,015 posts)
14. They are ALL Lyinng Cowards
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:36 PM
Feb 2012

This is nothing more than blatant political theatre executed to distract the public and the media from the reality that the GOP hasn`t got a fucking clue how to win in 2012, and even less of a plan for America other then more of the same slash and burn of the middle class and working Americans.

They are so scared shitless they are resorting to the old tired, overused and ineffectivee canard: Culture Wars.

They are going to get fucking crushed in November.

All of this shit will come back like spring chickens to haunt them come the final electiion stretch.

Beartracks

(12,814 posts)
15. His religious freedom extends to curtailing others' freedoms?
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:29 AM
Feb 2012

Which country does he think he's living in?

===========================

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
17. Ol' Carlos' approval numbers probably just jumped fifteen points
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:44 AM
Feb 2012


Carlos Bilbao is the state representative from Emmett, county seat of Gem County, which is very small, very remote, very fundamentalist and no gem. If you've seen "The Cannonball Run" you might remember the town where Dean Martin and Sammy Davis Jr. got pulled over by the sheriff at gunpoint. A banner hung across Main Street with the sheriff's campaign slogan, "God, Guns and Guts will free us all from these hippie nuts." Emmett is the Idaho version of that town.

The thing you need to understand about Emmett is, the women who vote for this man don't think they're voting against their own self-interest, they think God ordained them to produce a never-ending stream of children. And there's no way to change their minds.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
18. Carlos Bilao Is An Affront To My Religion
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:01 AM
Feb 2012

I don't need him shoving his religion down my throat.

Besides, it is my understanding that, while State law can go further than Federal law, it cannot restrict Federal law. If that is the case then these laws are nothing more than political grandstanding intended to fire up the base for November.

ejbr

(5,856 posts)
19. I'm kinda with the Republicans on this one...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 08:42 AM
Feb 2012

after all this time, I cannot count on the intelligence of the average American voter when it comes to state politicians.

Vinca

(50,273 posts)
20. We'll see how the health care bill "affronts" their religious freedom when
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 08:52 AM
Feb 2012

big insurance stops sending the campaign checks. Birth control pills are a whole lot cheaper than labor and delivery and the name of the game is money.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
25. you know, I wouldn't be surprised
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:19 AM
Feb 2012

if the next thing they do is to say that using an epidural during delivery goes against their religious beliefs because god said that women were condemned to go through labor and delivery in mind-splitting pain because Adam didn't kill the serpent who offered Eve the apple, like he had the authority to do. When Eve gave him the apple, he should have beaned the serpent with it, not taken a bite out of it because god had the conversation with HIM before Eve was created about not eating from that tree. One who didn't exist when the party line was formed cannot be blamed for not knowing the party line.

Eve has been framed ever since and all women, since religion has been established, have been punished because of it.

BumRushDaShow

(129,053 posts)
21. Hopefully women in these states
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 09:15 AM
Feb 2012

will help to throw these bums out of office! Time for a complete rout.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»States attack ‘Obamacare’...