CWA Pushes New Bi-Partisan Bill To Stop Offshoring Call Centers
Source: NH Labor News
Press 1 For America Bi-Partisan Bill Lets Consumers Choose U.S. Based Call Centers and Bans Tax Dollars for Companies that Off-Shore U.S. Call Center Jobs
Call Center Bill Would Require Customer Service Reps To Identify Their Location And Offer Consumers The Chance To Be Transferred To A U.S. Call Center
WASHINGTON, D.C. The Communications Workers of America (CWA) today hailed the introduction of the bi-partisan U.S. Call Center and Worker Protection Act of 2013 (H.R. 2909), legislation that lets consumers choose to use a U.S. based call center and would end taxpayer subsidies for corporations that send U.S. jobs off-shore.
The Press 1 For America section of the legislation requires call center employees to identify the country from which they are taking the call, and if outside the United States, offer the consumer the opportunity to be transferred back to a facility located in the U.S. Further, the bill also requires that a list of companies that send jobs off shore be made available to the public. An additional provision allows firms that return jobs to the United States from overseas to be taken off that list, and companies that send U.S. jobs offshore would be barred from receiving federal loans, grants or subsidies for three years.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://nhlabornews.com/2013/08/cwa-pushes-new-bi-partisan-bill-to-stop-offshoring-call-centers/
I'm right in the middle of a complaint with Travelocity that is being transferred to India I believe.
About NH Labor News
The New Hampshire Labor News is a group of NH Workers who believe that we need to protect ourselves against the attacks on workers. We are proud union members who are working to preserve the middle class. The NHLN talks mostly about news and politics from NH. We also talk about national issues that effect working men and women here in the Granite State.
View all posts by NH Labor News → http://nhlabornews.com/author/admin/
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)For someone in the USA and then the crap starts. I continue to repeat I have a language until I am transferred. This takes valuable time out of my day. The companies wants us to purchase their products but wants the cheap labor in other countries and this money does not return to our economy for workers wages. It is a loose- loose situation for the US.
antigop
(12,778 posts)The "advantages" go to the CEOs and shareholders.
I'm still waiting for her explanation of what engineers and IT people are supposed to train for after their jobs are outsourced.
bread_and_roses
(6,335 posts)Rebellious Republican
(5,029 posts)Let alone someone with a thick accent!
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)NHLabor
(70 posts)This is the type of legislation that every senator and congressional rep should be pushing. A real plan to create jobs, and reinvest in the American economy.
(Thanks for posting steve)
Omaha Steve
(99,618 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)I'd like to think that Congress would do the right thing and pass this bill, but I'll be very surprised if it does. The objections will be packaged in the usual pablum of infringement of free speech or harm to business, etc.
Call centers are rapidly replacing high tech employment where I live, literally now, it seems. An empty building on the HP campus is being leased out to an outfit to house 1,800 employees for yet another call center here in town (Boise). A facility near where I live advertises a starting pay of $10.50/hr, so our relatively low wage scale is a big part of the equation.