Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 05:25 PM Aug 2013

Unease at Clinton Foundation Over Finances and Ambitions

Source: New York Times

Soon after the 10th anniversary of the foundation bearing his name, Bill Clinton met with a small group of aides and two lawyers from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. Two weeks of interviews with Clinton Foundation executives and former employees had led the lawyers to some unsettling conclusions.

The review echoed criticism of Mr. Clinton’s early years in the White House: For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.

And concern was rising inside and outside the organization about Douglas J. Band, a onetime personal assistant to Mr. Clinton who had started a lucrative corporate consulting firm — which Mr. Clinton joined as a paid adviser — while overseeing the Clinton Global Initiative, the foundation’s glitzy annual gathering of chief executives, heads of state, and celebrities.

The review set off more than a year of internal debate, and spurred an evolution in the organization that included Mr. Clinton’s daughter, Chelsea, taking on a dominant new role as the family grappled with the question of whether the foundation — and its globe-spanning efforts to combat AIDS, obesity and poverty — would survive its founder.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/politics/unease-at-clinton-foundation-over-finances-and-ambitions.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0&comments



This is a detailed analysis of the problems experienced at the Clinton Foundation, chock full of facts about the intermixing of political, money-making and charitable activities without maintaining sufficient boundaries between them.

Yet the foundation’s expansion has also been accompanied by financial problems. In 2007 and 2008, the foundation also found itself competing against Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign for donors amid a recession. Millions of dollars in contributions intended to seed an endowment were diverted to other programs, creating tension between Mr. Magaziner and Mr. Band. The foundation piled up a $40 million deficit during those two years, according to tax returns. Last year, it ran more than $8 million in the red
.
and:
As the foundation grew, so did the outside business ventures pursued by Mr. Clinton and several of his aides. None have drawn more scrutiny in Clinton circles than Teneo, a firm co-founded in 2009 by Mr. Band, described by some as a kind of surrogate son to Mr. Clinton. Aspiring to merge corporate consulting, public relations and merchant banking in a single business, Mr. Band poached executives from Wall Street, recruited other Clinton aides to join as employees or advisers and set up shop in a Midtown office formerly belonging to one of the country’s top hedge funds. By 2011, the firm had added a third partner, Declan Kelly, a former State Department envoy for Mrs. Clinton. And Mr. Clinton had signed up as a paid adviser to the firm.

Teneo worked on retainer, charging monthly fees as high as $250,000, according to current and former clients. The firm recruited clients who were also Clinton Foundation donors, while Mr. Band and Mr. Kelly encouraged others to become new foundation donors. Its marketing materials highlighted Mr. Band’s relationship with Mr. Clinton and the Clinton Global Initiative, where Mr. Band sat on the board of directors through 2011 and remains an adviser. Some Clinton aides and foundation employees began to wonder where the foundation ended and Teneo began.

Those worries intensified after the collapse of MF Global, the international brokerage firm led by Jon S. Corzine, a former governor of New Jersey, in the fall of 2011. The firm had been among Teneo’s earliest clients, and its collapse over bad European investments — while paying $125,000 a month for the firm’s public relations and financial advice — drew Teneo and the Clintons unwanted publicity.


Also, take a look at this link re how the Foundation has performed in its charitable activities.

http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.comments&orgid=6903#.UgvxgazYCSo
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
2. Attention to detail has never been Clinton's strong suit
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 05:51 PM
Aug 2013

And this looks like more of the same - lots of big ideas, no follow through, and nobody really in charge.

I can see scandal and lawsuits in the future if somebody doesn't get hold of this. And an end to the presidential ambitions of Hillary Clinton before they even get off the ground.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
4. I'm sure Bill Clinton, who oversaw
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 06:22 PM
Aug 2013

the greatest growth ever for the US economy, will be devastated by your dissatisfaction.

LOL!



Divernan

(15,480 posts)
6. I agree - and it would certainly be best for candidate Hillary Clinton
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 08:27 PM
Aug 2013

In the comments to the Times article, there are several from people who support a Clinton candidacy and don't like to see her sharing office space with the foundation, and several people identifying themselves as having worked for the Foundation and being concerned about the mixing of philanthropic personnel/funds with political activities.

A word to the wise, etc., get everything in order, because you will be under a microscope even more than you are now.

karynnj

(59,500 posts)
7. To me, that is the message they want out there
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 08:35 PM
Aug 2013

I hope for the Democratic party, they do just that. I do think that many potential nominees do "use" a non profit to both firm up a key issue and to put together proposals that will become the platform they are running on. Recently, John Edwards did just that with his poverty center. (To be bipartisan, so did Newt Gingrich with his foundation on his issues.)

I think separating them also suggests how they can use the foundation. They could speak of the good work it has done and speak of how that will remain Bill Clinton's primary role. (Here, I would have thought that John Kerry could have more prominently spoken of the wonderful things that Teresa Heinz Kerry's foundation had done -- and would continue to do.)

The comments were very thoughtful for the most part - and as you noted many added a lot from their own experience. (In fact, there were so many, I wonder if some insiders were using the NYT to try to get their concerns out in a calm way.)

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
10. That's why Chelsea was concerned and the family asked for an internal review.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 10:10 AM
Aug 2013

Her dad could not by himself be in charge of the whole business side of running the foundation. That's an area where Chelsea excels. The foundation has growing pains. They'll hire the right people and fix the problems.

marshall

(6,665 posts)
11. And Chelsea has got her own future to think about
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 02:46 PM
Aug 2013

She can't afford to jump headlong into something before she is sure that everything is fixed.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
8. The Corzine Link is disturbing. Lots of threads in this article that
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 09:08 PM
Aug 2013

could be unraveled or untangled if there was more scrutiny. John Corzine's Hedge Fund going down has disappeared from the Wall Street News. Not that there's any "definite connection" from this article...except from overlapping staff. But, still.

And, I thought that Clinton/Bush Haiti Initiative had some bad press about a year ago for accounting about where the money went because there didn't seem to be much progress there. A Forestry Initiative is mentioned in the NYT article...and I wonder if they were going to try to start to "re-forest Haiti" and somehow it ran into obstacles.

One wonders if the CGI would be tempted to "chip in" if Hillary decided to run. Would think there would be temptation to borrow...from time to time (with intent to pay back) given that Political Campaigns often run short at critical times. But, many Politicians have gotten into trouble from that kind of connection.

Anyway, and interesting read. And that the Foundation only has a "2 Star Rating." Hopefully Chelsea will be able to help reorganize.

karynnj

(59,500 posts)
9. Given that Bill Clinton has the connections that are worth money themselves, the 2 star rating
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 10:01 PM
Aug 2013

really is not that good.

Although Chelsea is obviously very bright, taking on fixing this up will be a huge undertaking for her.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Unease at Clinton Foundat...