Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Berlin Expat

(949 posts)
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 05:25 AM Aug 2013

Met investigating Rupert Murdoch firm News International as 'corporate suspect'

Source: The Independent (U.K.)

The Independent has learnt the Metropolitan Police has opened an “active investigation” into the corporate liabilities of the UK newspaper group – recently rebranded News UK – which could have serious implications for the ability of its parent company News Corp to operate in the United States. One of Rupert Murdoch’s most senior lawyers has been interviewed under caution on behalf of the company and two other very senior figures have been officially cautioned for corporate offences. John Turnbull, who works on News Corp’s Management and Standards Committee (MSC) which co-ordinates the company’s interactions with the Metropolitan Police, answered formal questions from detectives earlier this year.

The development has caused pandemonium at the upper echelons of the Murdoch media empire. Shortly afterwards, executives in America ordered that the company dramatically scale back its co-operation with the Metropolitan Police.

A News Corp analysis of the effects of a corporate charge, produced in New York, said the consequences could “kill the corporation and 46,000 jobs would be in jeopardy”.

Lawyers for the media behemoth have pleaded with the Met and the Crown Prosecution Service not to prosecute the company as it would not be in the “public interest” to put thousands of jobs at risk. Gerson Zweifach, the group general counsel of News Corp, flew in to London for emergency talks with the Met last year. According to Scotland Yard, he told police: “Crappy governance is not a crime. The downstream effects of a prosecution would be apocalyptic. The US authorities’ reaction would put the whole business at risk, as licences would be at risk.”

Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/exclusive-met-investigating-rupert-murdoch-firm-news-international-as-corporate-suspect-over-hacking-and-bribing-offences-8771560.html



This segment from the last paragraph of the extract is, to me, the most important:

Gerson Zweifach, the group general counsel of News Corp, flew in to London for emergency talks with the Met last year. According to Scotland Yard, he told police: “Crappy governance is not a crime. The downstream effects of a prosecution would be apocalyptic. The US authorities’ reaction would put the whole business at risk, as licences would be at risk.”

The concern of News Corp honchos seems to be that if News Corp were found to be a criminal enterprise in the U.K. that the FCC may pull their broadcast license in the US, effectively shutting down Fox News Channel, and presumably, other enterprises.

The RW screeching would be deafening, though I must confess, music to my ears. FNC purveys nothing but the most blatant disinformation and propaganda.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Met investigating Rupert Murdoch firm News International as 'corporate suspect' (Original Post) Berlin Expat Aug 2013 OP
"effectively shutting down Fox News Channel" ? dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #1
Good point: Berlin Expat Aug 2013 #3
K&R DeSwiss Aug 2013 #2
If the hunters killed the Fox (tally ho!), wouldn't the void be filled with valerief Aug 2013 #4
Whose void did Fox fill? marble falls Aug 2013 #5
It took advantage of the explosion of cable subscribers in the 90s. valerief Aug 2013 #6
didn't the fox murdock just move the money to his NEW 'corp' 21st century fox? Sunlei Aug 2013 #7
Sadly it couldn't happen here. tblue Aug 2013 #8

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. "effectively shutting down Fox News Channel" ?
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 05:34 AM
Aug 2013

Already split from newspapers so maybe unlikely. Aside from that best just see what happens here in the UK first instead of speculating - this has already been going on for over a year.

Berlin Expat

(949 posts)
3. Good point:
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 06:30 AM
Aug 2013

the UK investigation has been going on for quite some time now.

The real fear of the News Corp honchos is that charges of felonious activities in the boardroom could lead to a wipeout on the stock market. They're listed on the NASDAQ if I'm not mistaken.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
2. K&R
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 05:49 AM
Aug 2013
''Lawyers for the media behemoth have pleaded with the Met and the Crown Prosecution Service not to prosecute the company as it would not be in the “public interest” to put thousands of jobs at risk.''

- Awww, they're only worried about what would happen to the little people. Ain't that nice?

valerief

(53,235 posts)
4. If the hunters killed the Fox (tally ho!), wouldn't the void be filled with
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 07:18 AM
Aug 2013

other RW media? The vacuum wouldn't be filled with, say, The Young Turks or Mother Jones.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
6. It took advantage of the explosion of cable subscribers in the 90s.
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 10:25 AM
Aug 2013

Probably thanks to Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
7. didn't the fox murdock just move the money to his NEW 'corp' 21st century fox?
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 10:45 AM
Aug 2013

looks to me like the uk will sue the 'remains'. Then here comes the usa 20 years from now to sue the dust.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
8. Sadly it couldn't happen here.
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 11:13 AM
Aug 2013

Justice, crime, and freedom have different definitions here in the USA.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Met investigating Rupert ...