Scalia to Federalist Society: Court shouldn't 'invent new minorities'
Source: The Missoulian
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia told a Montana audience Monday that American courts too often decide what rights we ought to have, when that decision instead should lie with the people, through their elected officials.
Scalia, speaking to more than 300 people at a Bozeman luncheon sponsored by the conservative Federalist Society, said this inventing of rights goes directly against his crusade to uphold the U.S. Constitutions original meaning a cause he said is losing ground.
Were now in an age when the high courts opinions speak of an evolving Constitution, he said. It means what it ought to mean. And who decides what it ought to mean?
Nine lawyers. Actually five lawyers. What, are you crazy? Who would ever set up a system like that?
Read more: http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/scalia-to-federalist-society-court-shouldn-t-invent-new-minorities/article_083f2eb6-0922-11e3-850c-001a4bcf887a.html
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)rpannier
(24,328 posts)Just knowing he realizes what a pr*ck he was and suffering from his own sociopathy
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Other than that, please go away and never be seen in public again, Tony. You're a despicable mammal. Worms are above you.
valerief
(53,235 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)ConcernedCanuk
(13,509 posts).
.
.
CC
lastlib
(23,168 posts)The Constitutional Convention of 1787?
Once again, you're an idiot, Tony. Go eat some more pasta and clog a few more arteries. And STFU.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)PLEASE quit, Scalia. Now.
muntrv
(14,505 posts)And if we went by "original meaning," Clarence Thomas would be a slave!