Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 09:09 AM Aug 2013

Syria will let inspectors go to site of suspected chemical weapons attack, official says

Source: CNN

Syria has agreed to allow weapons inspectors full access to any site of a purported chemical weapons attack, effective immediately, Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal al Mekdad tells CNN's Fred Pleitgen.

As Western powers try to verify claims that Syria deployed chemical weapons last week in a Damascus suburb, the government is pointing the finger at rebel forces.

They are pointing it back, accusing the government of gassing hundreds of people to death.

United Nations inspectors in Syria, attempting to gather information, say that Syria has not permitted them to visit the site of the attack.

In the meantime, the Pentagon has sent four warships armed with cruise missiles to the region.


Read more: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/08/25/world/meast/syria-civil-war/index.html?hpt=hp_c2

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Syria will let inspectors go to site of suspected chemical weapons attack, official says (Original Post) Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 OP
If it as I suspect it turns out dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #1
How absurd. You are, of course, familiar with this regimes long history of murdering grantcart Aug 2013 #8
Less so than than the USA's long history of interference in other countries dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #9
Now that they bombedthe fuck out of everything and make sur that all proof are destroyed.... Sand Wind Aug 2013 #2
The insurgents could always surrender or flee. David__77 Aug 2013 #3
Rejected by the US Benton D Struckcheon Aug 2013 #4
that does not look good. I suspect we will see some kind of attack, soon. Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #5
Nice of them to wait for things to dissipate. (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2013 #6
Yes, and the rebels will snipe them to death and Syrian government will get blamed. nt kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #7
What bullshit RobertEarl Aug 2013 #10
Would we ever lie about WMDs? ;) ozone_man Aug 2013 #11

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. If it as I suspect it turns out
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 09:15 AM
Aug 2013

it was the insurgents who used the chemicals then presumably the cruise missiles will be used against them and not the government.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
8. How absurd. You are, of course, familiar with this regimes long history of murdering
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 12:16 PM
Aug 2013

tens of thousands to maintain power.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hama_massacre

Initial diplomatic reports from western governments in 1982 had believed that 1000 were killed in the fighting.[3][4] Subsequent estimates of casualties vary from 7,000 to 40,000 people killed, including about 1,000 soldiers.[citation needed] Robert Fisk, who was in Hama shortly after the massacre, originally estimated fatalities at 10,000, but has since doubled the estimate to 20,000.[1][20][21] The president's brother Rifaat reportedly boasted of killing 38,000 people.[22] Amnesty International initially estimated the death toll was between 10,000 and 25,000, the vast majority civilians.[8]

Reports by the Syrian Human Rights Committee estimate "over 25,000"[23] or between 30,000 to 40,000 people were killed.[6] The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood also suggests a figure of approximately 40,000 victims.

Twenty years later, Syrian journalist Subhi Hadidi, wrote that "under the command of General Ali Haydar, besieged the city for 27 days, bombarding it with heavy artillery and tank [fire], before invading it and killing 30,000 or 40,000 of the city's citizens – in addition to the 15,000 missing who have not been found to this day, and the 100,000 expelled."[2]



Use of Sarin requires a substantial infrastructure for manufacture and maintenance, and the regime has long had Sarin in inventory.

Even after Al Jazeera was publishing photo graphic evidence the regime was denying that there was any attack:



The accounts could not be verified independently and were denied by Syrian state television, which said they were disseminated deliberately to distract a team of United Nations chemical weapons experts that arrived three days ago.

Syria's Information Minister called the activists' claim a 'disillusioned and fabricated one whose objective is to deviate and mislead' the UN mission.








Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2398691/Syrias-darkest-hour-Hundreds-childrens-bodies-piled-high-nerve-gas-attack-near-Damascus-leaves-1-300-dead.html#ixzz2d5nABoI9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
9. Less so than than the USA's long history of interference in other countries
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 02:41 PM
Aug 2013

resulting in a multitude of deaths : Guatemala, Chile , Iraq.............

Assad didn't come to power until 2000.

 

Sand Wind

(1,573 posts)
2. Now that they bombedthe fuck out of everything and make sur that all proof are destroyed....
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 10:04 AM
Aug 2013

Putin now what he is doing .


David__77

(23,367 posts)
3. The insurgents could always surrender or flee.
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 10:21 AM
Aug 2013

It would be wrong for the army to simply let the insurgents terrorize the people there with impunity.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
10. What bullshit
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 03:11 PM
Aug 2013

Our spy satellites can read a friggin license tag, but they can't tell us where the missiles came from?

Somebody is flat out lying.

ozone_man

(4,825 posts)
11. Would we ever lie about WMDs? ;)
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 09:54 PM
Aug 2013

Most wars are started under false pretenses. I think the U.N. has previously suggested that it was the rebels that used gas, why would we expect this time to be different? Or perhaps it is the CIA or Mossad. I think Assad would be crazy to use these weapons, not that it isn't possible. Let's not rush into another war. Is it just me or is Obama carrying out the Neocon Plan for a New American Century?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Syria will let inspectors...