Yahoo CEO Mayer: we faced jail if we revealed NSA surveillance secrets
Source: Guardian
Marissa Mayer, the CEO of Yahoo, and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook struck back on Wednesday at critics who have charged tech companies with doing too little to fight off NSA surveillance. Mayer said executives faced jail if they revealed government secrets.
Yahoo and Facebook, along with other tech firms, are pushing for the right to be allowed to publish the number of requests they receive from the spy agency. Companies are forbidden by law to disclose how much data they provide.
During an interview at the Techcrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco, Mayer was asked why tech companies had not simply decided to tell the public more about what the US surveillance industry was up to. "Releasing classified information is treason and you are incarcerated," she said.
Mayer said she was "proud to be part of an organisation that from the beginning, in 2007, has been sceptical of and has been scrutinizing those requests [from the NSA]."
Yahoo has previously unsuccessfully sued the foreign intelligence surveillance (Fisa) court, which provides the legal framework for NSA surveillance. In 2007 it asked to be allowed to publish details of requests it receives from the spy agency. "When you lose and you don't comply, it's treason," said Mayer. "We think it make more sense to work within the system," she said.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/sep/11/yahoo-ceo-mayer-jail-nsa-surveillance
bluesbassman
(19,378 posts)Bank CEOs preside over fraudulent mortgage practices that put people out on the street, Big Oil CEOs run companies that collude with each other to gouge the public, and not one of them will ever see the front door of a prison (unless they look out the window of their limos as they drive by), yet poor little Mark and Marissa are worried they're going to get tossed in the poky for releasing data?
My friends, we live in a fucked up world.
villager
(26,001 posts)After all, no one had better block access to the info on us citizens!
hughee99
(16,113 posts)fuck the government.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)oh that's right ... "state secrets" trumps the US Constitution. <-- but I don't buy it for a second.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Trillo
(9,154 posts)separation of business and state?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)But if your going to take the plunge, at least use the correct terminology!
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)And the less likely it is they will do something that leads to losing it.
24601
(3,962 posts)sending your kids to school and saving for old age are good recommendations.
fashion is BS
defining normal is pretty improbably to capture for a diverse population.
Walking on the sidewalk beats the street if you don't like being rundown by cars or trampling your neighbor's flowers.
Watching TV? as opposed to what, listening to Talk Radio or reading the Washington Times?
Obey the law? Which ones, ACA or the ones about murder, drunk driving, paying taxes, or which ones did he/she mean?
Repeat after you that you are free?
Screw that, I'll keep myself free and if the issue is significant enough, I'll make the decision to instead accept consequences
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Trillo
(9,154 posts)and It's Sickening Our Politics" juxtaposed with this thread.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023651920
jsr
(7,712 posts)Say, go back to the old one ten years ago that worked perfectly.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)For anything.
jsr
(7,712 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)For your bravery?
Obviously, if the law prohibits doing it, then don't. But don't come whining to your users, telling us how you really have a heart of gold, even if it doesn't seem like it.