Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,033 posts)
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 10:30 PM Feb 2012

Iran warns Israel not to attack its nuclear facilities

Iran has warned Israel against mounting an attack on its nuclear facilities amid rising international tension over its uranium enrichment programme.

General Ahmad Vahidi issued a statement warning Israel that an attack would lead to the collapse of the Jewish state.

The warning on Iran's state-run Press TV website came after a UN report said Iran had tripled its production rate of enriched uranium over the past three months.

The confidential report to member states, seen by the Guardian, also states that Iran is refusing to co-operate with an investigation into evidence that the country may have worked on designing a bomb.

full: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/25/iran-warns-israel-attack-nuclear

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iran warns Israel not to attack its nuclear facilities (Original Post) alp227 Feb 2012 OP
It certainly makes one wonder if Iran has something that could prove fatal to Israel if they teddy51 Feb 2012 #1
They don't have anything. Just like Isreal, probably, doesn't have the means to take out Fool Count Feb 2012 #2
Current military status OVERPAID01 Feb 2012 #3
That actually sounds accurate to me, at least Israel wise. AverageJoe90 Feb 2012 #4
 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
1. It certainly makes one wonder if Iran has something that could prove fatal to Israel if they
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 10:39 PM
Feb 2012

do attack. Apart from the fact that Iran has 70 million people as opposed to Israel's 8 million, I am wondering what they have.

 

Fool Count

(1,230 posts)
2. They don't have anything. Just like Isreal, probably, doesn't have the means to take out
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 10:47 PM
Feb 2012

all Iran's nuclear facilities on its own. It's just bluster on both sides. A high-stakes poker game.

 

OVERPAID01

(71 posts)
3. Current military status
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 12:06 AM
Feb 2012

There are currently NO bombs capable of penetrating the facilities in Iran. If you research/remember the first attacks on Iraq in Desert Storm, we had to make the bunker busting bombs from old tank nozzles from WW2. The Iranian facilities were built deeper into the ground with far more armor than anything produced up to now. The lack of armaments are the reason, and probably the only reason Israel hasn't attacked them years ago. Syria was attacked by Israel within weeks after building their first reactor. That being said, the reason for the procrastination is also due in no large part, when it is taken into account that Iran is feircely independant. Think in terms of the U.S. back in the 40's we built our own equipment and weapons and developed our own systems, no outsourcing and no sharing info. Iran operates in the same fashion, they build their own weapons and only asks for assistance on implementing acruements. They are far more dangerous that Iraq could ever have hoped to be.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran warns Israel not to ...