Cruz: GOP lost because they didn’t accuse Dems of holding children ‘hostage’
Source: Raw Story
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) says that Republicans could have won the fight to derail President Barack Obamas health care law by shutting down the government if they had just accused the Democrats holding children with cancer hostage.
In an interview that aired on Sunday, CNNs Dana Bash asked Cruz if he was bothered on a human level that so many colleagues in his own party were angry at him for instigating the shutdown.
Not remotely, Cruz insisted. I work for 26 million Texans, thats my job to fight for them. I dont work for the party bosses in Washington
The reason people are frustrated all over the country is that far too many people get elected and they think theyre there to be part of the club.
The Texas senator observed that things could have turned out differently if Senate Republicans had marched into battle side by side with House Republicans to defund Obamacare.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/20/cruz-gop-lost-because-they-didnt-accuse-dems-of-holding-children-hostage/
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)Harvard Law School. He is smarter than 99.99 percent of the people who took the LSAT. He is not stupid, nor an idiot. He is very smart and very, very dangerous. He is potentially the most dangerous man American has ever faced as an internal enemy, and we had best learn how to counter his evil. He is very smart and has no scruples.
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)there's a whole bunch of educated fools occupying America.
I work and have worked with several of them.
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)brain cell in head other than their subject field
treestar
(82,383 posts)think they were experts in every field.
Maraya1969
(22,506 posts)Nothing, Nada. The only thing that came up was President Obama's records.
Where did you get your information?
icymist
(15,888 posts)<snip>
As it turned out, though, almost everyone I knew well in college remembered him really well. Vividly. And I knew a number of his friends. But for whatever reason I just didn't remember him. When I saw college pictures of him, I thought okay, yeah, I remember that guy but sort of in the way where you're not 100% sure you're not manufacturing the recollection.
I was curious. Was this just my wife who tends to be a get-along and go-along kind of person? So I started getting in touch with a lot of old friends and asking whether they remembered Ted. It was an experience really unlike I've ever had. Everybody I talked to - men and women, cool kids and nerds, conservative and liberal - started the conversation pretty much the same.
"Ted? Oh yeah, immense a*#hole." Sometimes "total raging a#%hole." Sometimes other variations on the theme. But you get the idea. Very common reaction.
But that wasn't all. Before retelling this or that anecdote, there was one other thing that everybody said, "A really, really smart dude."
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/me-ted
Maraya1969
(22,506 posts)to a reporter about his very low approval rating.................well wait a minute. He did say that 20% of the respondents were government workers so that's why he was getting bad results, (one of them) and it turns out that 20% of the country is government employed. So maybe he just knew that fact and used it to manipulate people into thinking he was not that bad.
I would never want to be that kind of smart.
Then again you have not sited a source for his LSAT's score. He could have just studied himself out of his supidness, in college at least.
Lost in confusion again
icymist
(15,888 posts)It was just some background on the man. Frankly, if he's allowed himself to be an anointed 'King' by zealot dominionist pastors will only add to feed a unhealthy ego. Could be a sign that he's so smart that he's stupid!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/video-ted-cruz-anointed-b_b_4088456.html
Cha
(297,760 posts)college roomate said Ted was "smelly".
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023839988
Beacool
(30,253 posts)It seems that, aside from a small group of people who think like him, almost everyone he encountered in his life think that the guy is very smart but a huge asshole.
"As my correspondent notes, Ted managed to distinguish himself as an arrogant a#@hole at Harvard Law School, which is an amazing accomplishment since the competition there for that description is intense. This is the story Jason Zengerle managed to confirm for his new article in GQ. And I'm glad he did. I've been wondering about how much of this to report out myself. But I felt like I had kind of a conflict of interest or maybe unfair advantage knowing so many of the people first hand.
At each stage, Ted did seem to collect a quite small but core group of friends/followers, mainly people who were deeply in tune with his politics (he was as rightwing on day one at college as he is today) and who took what most found to be his assholery as a form of take-no-prisoners conservative badassdom. Indeed, if you think this is an issue of whom I talked to, just like-minded people maybe, consider this: It perfectly mirrors what's happened over the last year in the Senate. Cruz has a small handful of followers in the Senate; but basically everyone else in his Republican caucus despises him."
Yeah, in the Senate Cruz is as polular as the plague.
Gman
(24,780 posts)A good unemotional response. For the reasons you cite he is dangerous.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)egomaniac and nothing more.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,047 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)trishtrash
(74 posts)He is crazy like a fox but also very smart. I've listened to his interviews and he has a scary way with words. I think he could easily win the early primaries and be hard to catch.
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)Doing well on the LSAT and even the bar exam is not necessarily an indication of intelligence. I improved my LSAT scores by taking a quality prep course and was in the top 98% when I took the state bar exam because I mastered the art of the multi-state exam.
Admission to Harvard is arguably more than good LSAT scores. They look for aptitude based on LSAT, educational performance, etc. but they also look for personal qualities that will enhance the institution's reputation.
Cruz is reasonably intelligent but cunning, obsessed with self-grandeur and a pathology of reasoning likely refracted through a misguided religious fervor.
He is indeed very dangerous. Cruz makes GWB look like a babe in swaddling clothes. We must be very wary of him and be constantly on guard.
Turbineguy
(37,372 posts)I don't think he represents 26 million Texans. He represents Fox viewing sheep who are told what to think. And he represents those who pay him (and I'm not talking about the US Treasury!).
Scairp
(2,749 posts)I've come across many educated fools and Cruz certainly qualifies. I don't give a shit how great his education is he's still a moron.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)He'll never, ever be more than the loony Senator from Texas no one likes.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Beacool
(30,253 posts)He graduated either cum laude or summa cum laude from both schools. He was also a champion debater. His intelligence makes him far more dangerous than dopes like Palin, Bachmann, Gohmert, et al.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)I dare say he's more intelligent, too, especially with the fact that he doesn't hold office. There's not a damn thing we can do directly to prevent Rove's influence. Cruz can be censured, and even voted to be removed from the Senate, at least as I understand it according to some of our poly-sci scholars around here.
Rove will continue doing his damage until he dies.
treestar
(82,383 posts)show he has no people sense whatsoever. How clever is it to bend over backwards into extremism?
Roarybeans
(48 posts)Your right. We better develope a strategy to knock this guy out of politics before he does more damage.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)very crafty, ambitious, and sociopathic.
rocktivity
(44,580 posts)rocktivity
jessie04
(1,528 posts)PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)White is Black
Up is Down
Peace is War
He is something right out of 1984.
The only thing he hasn't invoked yet is Emmanuel Goldstein.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)Pretty soon he'll firing up the freakshow with rumors of healthcare concentration camps and genocide.
The CCC
(463 posts)Except that is exactly what his fellow repukes did.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)who sincerely believes Republicans care that much about kids with cancer. It doesn't square with freedumb-n-liburty and low taxes and punishing illegal immigrants and throwing people off food stamps. To make an accusation stick, there has to be a ring of truth--and no one is going to buy that it's actually the ANTI-health-reform party that gives a shit about sick people. Why do people say he's smart? Haven't seen evidence, aside from being able to fleece the gullible teabaggers out of donations.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)God wants they to fight a war for mankind's survival against the imaginary enemies the Koch brothers created for them.
Baggers are living in their own private North Korea. I really can't believe the media treats them as if they are anything other than a freakshow.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Unlike you who thinks it's all about the Benjamins.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023889012
Tikki
(14,559 posts)I can't even think of a stupid enough analogy to go with his statement. Someone
up board posted about 'projection'..and that pretty much describes it.
Tikki
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Doesn't even register to him that he's still talking like an extortionist.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)and shut down the government, denying more children last chance care....and that somehow meant the dems were holding them hostage?
Dude's missing a logic module. And Kathleen Parker called him a genius!
Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)You accuse your opponent of doing what you're doing.
Cruz held the government hostage, and then wanted to accuse the Dems of holding children hostage.
In "flipping" if you're going to engage in ad hominem attack, you accuse the other guy of engaging in ad hominem attack.
If you're going to lie blatantly, you accuse the other guy of lying blatantly.
This forecloses on the other side's ability to point out your misdeeds, because it's just a case of two sides calling each other liar. The undiscerning will not recognize that only one of the two parties has the facts on their side.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)but it doesn't matter because the loonies that vote for him don't understand logic. They will repeat what he says with 100% conviction. They will hear the same thing from Faux News, Rush and company and then they will "know" it is true. If he can fool enough people he'll get re-elected. In the meantime he gets the idiots riled up enough to send him money.
elleng
(131,171 posts)(nevermind 'sir.')
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)America hates you.
ancianita
(36,139 posts)are laughable even to them. No one's buying the gilded turds he's peddling anymore.
jsr
(7,712 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)mountain grammy
(26,656 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)I will raise you kids with NO coverage due to lifetime caps, no coverage due to pre-existing conditions and broken families who can't afford the co-pays much less the basic coverage.
Cruz has no plan to take care of the above and Romney would have them all go to the emergency room.
progree
(10,920 posts)can't refuse coverage. And on January 2014, the same will be true for adults -- insurers cannot refuse coverage or charge extra because of pre-existing conditions. The only things that insurers can charge more for is: age (I think older people may be charged up to a limit of 3 times what they charge young people), smoking status, and geographic location. (Well, I suppose all 3 are kind of pre-existing conditions, but well, let's say the only 3 pre-existing conditions that people can be charged more for).
And as you mentioned, no lifetime caps and subsidies (that children particularly in Texas and states like it will benefit the most from on a per-capita basis).
olddad56
(5,732 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)That was more than enough time to roll out your "holding children hostage" message so why just now? Could it be because this, like everything else coming out of your mouth, is a lie.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Democrats. These two were born in politics and have spent their entire lives building a political base. One is Mayor of San Antonio, the other a member of the State House.
"Julian and Joaquin Castro, rising political stars in Texas and the Democratic party, have been involved in politics since they were three years old. From attending La Raza Unida rallies with their parents in 1970s San Antonio, to later tying for first place in their first student senate race at Stanford University, the 38-year-old twins were destined for political clout and fame."
http://austin.culturemap.com/news/life/04-02-13-rising-political-stars-julian-and-joaquin-castro-talk-politics-policy-and-the-future-of-texas/
Their mother, Rosie, is pretty awesome, too, but she's had to move a bit to the right to get to The Left...from La Raza Unida.
http://www.southwestern.edu/live/news/7306-the-legacy-of-la-raza-unida
mountain grammy
(26,656 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)while watching the demise of the Tea Party. Seems like it's been a long haul.
mountain grammy
(26,656 posts)While I think that's a crock, I hope to see Texas with a future.. Wendy, the Castro brothers, and many more to come. The legacies of LBJ, Barbara Jordan, Ann Richards and Molly Ivins overshadow the small minded Ted Cruz.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)sharpest Mark Twain successors of our time. Life too soon snuffed out.
Read the talk on DU about helping other areas to turn states/districts from Red to at least Purple, Texas has got to be high on that list. Wendy Davis for Governor!
Texas politics is also about the future of American Hispanics. Ted Cruz could care less about Hispanics as a group, so hope the Castro brothers get into this. They are Ivy League intellectuals as well, just don't wave it in people's faces.
About the graphic... at least they let California keep it's west coastline, but Texas in the Pacific Northwest...ha.
kiranon
(1,727 posts)hold anyone hostage if it worked to get him what he wanted. IMHO, he is a dangerous man with a dangerous agenda.
narnian60
(3,510 posts)quit lying, Ted.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)...is a seriously scary place. Kinda makes you want to sneak therapeutic psychiatric meds into the Congressional water supply...
gtar100
(4,192 posts)responsibility for their own actions. Cruz has the schtick down pat.
icymist
(15,888 posts)The Texas senator observed that things could have turned out differently if Senate Republicans had marched into battle side by side with House Republicans to defund Obamacare.
What an arrogant little ego he has.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)asking for committee spots, would guess his name is far down the list. Partly because he is splitting the Party while trying to make fools of the Old Guard...not going to happen, IMO.
Also, The Kochs and Wall Street have stated they will not fund the Temper Tantrum Caucus Johnny-come-lately candidates. They have seen the wacko video of his Kingship and Reining 7 Mountains nuttery, as have his colleagues. This is not close to being in the mainstream in the religious world, except for a few like Palin. The money is not dumb nor blind. McCain will still be the leader.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)That jackass seems to think the average American is as f***** stupid as teabag republicans are!
subterranean
(3,427 posts)Have you ever had an argument or been insulted by someone, and only later think of the perfect snappy comeback that you wish you had said? We've all been there.
That's how this strikes me. Cruz is thinking, "If only we'd accused Democrats of holding kids with cancer hostage, we would have won! Dammit, why didn't I think of that before?"
He is wrong, of course. Few people other than teabaggers would have bought that lie.
sakabatou
(42,178 posts)drm604
(16,230 posts)The Democrats trying to provide healthcare to children can be described as "holding children hostage".
This tells us a lot about this guy. He's all about dishonesty, framing the message, and winning the game; and any means are justified.
Southside
(338 posts)Cruz is selling change that destroys. Scurry away AntChrist. Go back to the hole where you came from.
PuffedMica
(1,061 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,159 posts)Ted Cruz is so last week.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)who suggested that Cruz should keep his mouth shut for a while. He keeps damaging their party.
On the other hand, that's good for our side. Keep talking Rafael, don't let the establishment censor you!!!!
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)The guy he beat in the primaries to become a Freshman Senator, now talks with the same sort of way. Even to the point of bringing out Benghazi and impeachment.
Ridiculous.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,256 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)you are always on the wrong side of right. You are basically a a henchman for a couple of monsters.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Is there no bottom to which he can sink?