BREAKING: Senate rejects Blunt bill
Source: Twitter
-- which would limit access to contraception and other preventive heath care to 20M women -- 51-48.
Read more: https://twitter.com/#!/thinkprogress
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)news today.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)shcrane71
(1,721 posts)It would mean that your employer has no control over your healthcare.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)It's the health insurance industry who doesn't want it and they have the power to keep it away from the rest of us.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)So it's really corporate rule of our corrupt politicians that is preventing it from happening.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)My guess is that it's the former: you're a more persuasive speaker.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)facts behind you. In order to do that, I spend a lot of time and the Physicians for a National Health Plan website.
http://www.pnhp.org
Everything you need to know to make your case is there. Good luck!
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)Medicare for all is the best plan out there. I hope the Scotus puts the Kibosh on ACA and then we can all get Medicare and get the Insurance Companies out of the mix.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I can't seem to find it though. Sorry.
I think though that you are naive if you think putting the kibosh on the ACA is going to lead to Medicare for All. Unfortunately, we need it to eventually expand coverage of Medicare under the ACA until it takes over. The insurance companies want the ACA to be nullified because they know this could happen.
ornotna
(10,803 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)I guess I missed the /du store. I wonder why there isn't a direct link anymore from the website?
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Thank goodness, for Senator Snow not resigning yet.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Nelson in particular has an awful lot of apologists at DU.
still_one
(92,219 posts)MountainLaurel
(10,271 posts)I'm really curious how Mary Landrieu voted.
Manchin is an ultimate DINO -- anti-choice, anti-equality, anti-environment, and in the pocket of the mine companies.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)This time she was with the party.manchin,Ben Neson,Bob Casey voted for It.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,322 posts)Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), who announced Tuesday she would retire at the end of the Senate term, was the only Republican to vote in favor of tabling the amendment.
And one senator did not vote. Repubs have 47 senators, so, minus Snowe, and plus those 3 Dems, you'd expect 49 if all Repubs voted. Therefore, 1 Repub didn't vote, for whatever reason. And 51 Dems + Sanders + Lieberman = 53, - 3 + Snowe = 51, so all other Dems did vote for tabling it - including Landrieu.
MountainLaurel
(10,271 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Fuck all three of them and the horses they rode in on. I mean it. A Republican had to save us from this?
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)There's two DINO's with that name.
Mass
(27,315 posts)I wished I had the confidence that Bob Kerrey would be better.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)Kerry will be better.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)lark
(23,105 posts)The one from FL or more likely, Ben Nelson is my guess.
sonias
(18,063 posts)Way too close. The Republicans are the party of crazy. And yes this was about a contraception ban. It certainly would have made it less affordable for women.
I'm also grateful that Senator Snow voted with women.
glinda
(14,807 posts)being conservative. We need to take over by electing real Dems. Many many of them kicking out these crazy conservatives. For the sake of the Planet, environment and people.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)The pubs go right and the Dems follow them like the suckers they have become.
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)Pachamama
(16,887 posts)....employer to reject certain coverages if they deemed it against their moral or religious beliefs. This means many things could be eliminated and the idea that so many Politicians, especially those on the Republican side who claim to wanting less government in our lives, would even vote for this, are all liars and hate women.
3 fucking votes difference between this having become law (although there is no way that Obama would have signed it, no way.....but a Pres. santorum, Gingrich or Romney would!) is way too close for my liking.
We need to start seriously taking on these people who voted for this and especially the DINOs like Casey and the likes of Ben Nelson types....Obama will be re-elected but we must all work to make sure that the Congress and Senate will not have the likes of these types in the future....on either side of the isle.....
Seriously.....we are in the fucking 21st century and a group of primarily men are trying to decide laws that would hinder women from having contraception coverage in their health care?
This is WAR!!! I for one am pissed and not going to sit still or be quiet....even if all you can afford is $5, please donate to Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW and Emily's List. All of which will help make sure the message gets made loud and clear and get these basterds out of office that are assaulting womens rights and womens health....
vaberella
(24,634 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Simple message: To Republicans, Women Are Second Class Citizens. Don't Vote Republican.
Marthe48
(16,975 posts)n/t
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)The Senate voted to table the measure from Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), which would have let any employers opt out of healthcare coverage mandates that violate their religious or moral beliefs.
Three Democrats voted with Republicans to table the amendment: Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Bob Casey (Pa.) and Ben Nelson (Neb.). Casey and Manchin are both up for reelection in 2012.
Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), who announced Tuesday she would retire at the end of this year, was the only Republican to vote in favor of tabling the amendment.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)greater majority in the senate and take back the house? That we replace conservadems with progressives? That vote is waaaaaaaay too close.
still_one
(92,219 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)with real liberals and progressives?
still_one
(92,219 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)Important news.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)so Ms Warren will have another arrow in her bag against him.
Newkophile
(104 posts)He co-sponsored the bill and he's a Repuke. Indeed he voted for it.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Blood transfusions, vaccinations, HIV care, mental health care, treatment of diseases secondary to "sinful" lifestyles (STDs, cervical cancer, etc) could all be at risk. Can you imagine an employer denying coverage of medication for an employee with bipolar disorder because the employeris a Scientologist?
On edit: adding in bariatric surgery, assistance smoking cessation programs, drug and alcohol addiction rehab, etc. There are so many things someone could claim a "moral" objection to.
nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)would soon have the most "moral" objections. But, don't worry, I'm sure viagra would emerge unscathed.
chitowngal08
(7 posts)You are so right!
still_one
(92,219 posts)people, usually men, wanting to dictate their religious beliefs
polichick
(37,152 posts)On edit: Just called and got a recording due to "high call volume" - they probably just don't want to talk to pissed off constituents.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)it's illegal to practice medicine without credentials. This amendment would allow employers to practice medicine without credentials. When your boss determines medical treatment options the system has failed.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)And isn't that exactly what our esteemed legislators are doing--practicing medicine without credentials--when they pass sweeping laws that change or limit or deny people's healthcare?
Even after President Obama made it the insurance company in some cases that's responsible for coverage, the religious right still isn't happy. This isn't about freedom of religion - it's about women having freedom FROM religious dogma.
derby378
(30,252 posts)This amendment was a travesty, and I'm glad it's dead.
HoosierCowboy
(561 posts)Every CEO in the country would convert to Christian Science.
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)SENATE SMOKES BLUNT
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/politics/
Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)you can be assured that now every single damn state will go through their own ignorant BS routine of getting ultrasound legislation pushed through.
The despicable demeaning of women by Republicans is par for their repulsive course. For women legislators who are going down this heinous road (check out Pennsylvanias new intended TransV ultrasound bill) they are the very worst and will be professionally sorry. Their betrayal is obscene.
And Democrats who agree with any of these billious attempts should be soundly hounded out of office and replaced by genuine liberals who aren't dimwit sh*ts.
But by all means Republicans, make women mad.
They will never forget.
asfghjtyk
(22 posts)asfghjtyk
(22 posts)AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)malthaussen
(17,204 posts)What else do we need to tell us the system is broken?
-- Mal
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)His first response was that he was against it. Later he claimed that he thought the question was about some State law and of course he supported the "Blunt" bill.
That doesn't wash. Romney can't be so out of touch that he didn't know "Blunt-Rubio" was the same thing as the "Blunt" bill. Plus, why would he opine on a question he didn't understand "some State law". His explanation was a lose-lose at best.