Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 08:46 PM Dec 2013

Senate approves Johnson to head U.S. Homeland Security department

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:59pm EST

(Reuters) - The U.S. Senate on Monday confirmed Jeh Johnson, a national security expert who has served as the Pentagon's top lawyer, as head of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Johnson, who was the Defense Department's general counsel during President Barack Obama's first term, will succeed Janet Napolitano, who left in September to become the president of the University of California system.

The Senate approved Johnson on a vote of 78-16 as part of a raft of confirmations pushed forward after a recent rule change stripped Republicans of their power to block nominees with a procedural roadblock known as a filibuster.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/16/us-usa-senate-johnson-idUSBRE9BF1I120131216

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate approves Johnson to head U.S. Homeland Security department (Original Post) Eugene Dec 2013 OP
Jeh? Meh. valerief Dec 2013 #1
Snort. "Now you can call me Ray, or madinmaryland Dec 2013 #2
Ha! I'm old enough to remember that. nt valerief Dec 2013 #3
Look at you, US Senate! Getting shit done for once. maxsolomon Dec 2013 #4
McConnell's nuts got squeezed The Wizard Dec 2013 #6
The last thing I needed with a queasy stomach was a visual of anything happening to Nanjing to Seoul Dec 2013 #8
McConnell's The Wizard Dec 2013 #11
Funny how it passed 78-16 when it came to a vote fujiyama Dec 2013 #5
Amazing sprouting of "bipartisanship." You noticed it too? DFW Dec 2013 #9
We know virtually nothing about this guy....... Swede Atlanta Dec 2013 #7
Dude's most likely another Insider who'll do whatever he's told to do, and nothing more. blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #10

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
2. Snort. "Now you can call me Ray, or
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:15 PM
Dec 2013

you can call me J, or you can call me Johnny, or you can call me Sonny, or you can call me Junie, or you can call me Junior; now you can call me Ray J, or you can call me RJ, or you can call me RJJ, or you can call me RJJ Jr., but you doesn't hasta call me Johnson!"






maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
4. Look at you, US Senate! Getting shit done for once.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:24 PM
Dec 2013

All it took was destroying the "Comity" of the "World's Greatest Deliberative Body".

The Wizard

(12,545 posts)
6. McConnell's nuts got squeezed
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:32 PM
Dec 2013

A full rusty saw castration would be a sight that would generate big bucks in a pay-per-view fund raiser.

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
8. The last thing I needed with a queasy stomach was a visual of anything happening to
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:54 PM
Dec 2013

Mitch McChinless' nuts.

:vomit:

fujiyama

(15,185 posts)
5. Funny how it passed 78-16 when it came to a vote
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:31 PM
Dec 2013

What happened to the rest of the republicans when he and others were being filibustered? Why didn't they break it then?

There is no difference between the "tea party" and the rest of the GOP. The supposed moderates are just a bunch of cowards. Props to Reid for breaking through through this bullshit.

DFW

(54,408 posts)
9. Amazing sprouting of "bipartisanship." You noticed it too?
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:55 PM
Dec 2013

Now that Republicans can't block EVERYTHING just for the hell of it, some of them are suddenly voting yes for more qualified nominees than they ever did before during Obama's presidency. They get no more headlines for voting no, and so they aren't bothering, except for the ones who would vote NO even if Obama nominated God to be Secretary of Defense and Wise King Solomon to the Supreme Court.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
7. We know virtually nothing about this guy.......
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:43 PM
Dec 2013

I do not trust the Department of "Faderland" Security.

We would not need this department or the expanded surveillance of the NSA or Gitmo or any of the rest of this nonsense if Shrub had paid attention to the National Security Briefing "Al Qaeda committed to attack on U.S. soil using airplanes" and they had done something about it.

I still believe this was "allowed" to happen to create the security and police state in which we live. I think the PNAC guys wanted a domestic police state and they have now got it.

I respect the individuals working in this department as far as those simply doing their jobs. They have a job and they are doing it but as far as the policy makers and those at the top I have zero respect for them. They are NOT protecting us if in the course of doing so they deprive us of our constitutional rights and grope young children at airports.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate approves Johnson t...