Feinstein: NSA phone surveillance 'important' but not 'indispensable'
Source: the guardian
The influential chairwoman of the Senate intelligence committee said on Tuesday that the National Security Agencys bulk collection of American phone records, savaged by a federal judge a day earlier, was not indispensable for preventing terrorism.
In an interview with MSNBC on Tuesday, senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat who has been a staunch supporter of the National Security Agency, urged the supreme court to determine its constitutionality.
Im not saying its indispensable, Feinstein said. But Im saying it is important, and it is a major tool in ferreting out a potential terrorist attack.
Her assessment came a day after Mondays dramatic ruling from Judge Richard Leon of the US district court for the District of Columbia, who doubted both the constitutionality of the bulk phone records collection and its necessity to stop terrorist attacks...
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/17/feinstein-nsa-bulk-surveillance-important-indispensable
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Because the Constitution is 'important' and 'indispensable'.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)So she probably is worried about her own ass at this point, and as a result wants to show some flexibility on this issue.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)I think I got the gist of it.
brer cat
(24,578 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Time to retire, my dear lady.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Her handlers however are auditioning her for the Senate Redux of Weekend at Bernies
Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)I'm sure a challenger would do well in that election cycle.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)all challengers. Their message: "Don't even THINK about challenging her." She was just re-elected in 2012. 'Course it would be nice if the CDP would just stay the hell out of influencing any one Democratic candidate in the primaries but those days are gone. The federal party is doing the same thing with Hillary.