Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsr

(7,712 posts)
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 03:13 AM Feb 2014

AOL chief reverses changes to 401(k) policy after a week of bad publicity

Source: Washington Post

AOL chief executive Tim Armstrong told employees in an e-mail Saturday evening that he was reversing the company’s 401(k) policy and apologized for his controversial comments last week.

“The leadership team and I listened to your feedback over the last week,” Armstrong wrote in his e-mail to the company. “We heard you on this topic. And as we discussed the matter over several days, with management and employees, we have decided to change the policy back to a per-pay-period matching contribution.”

The decision came after days of pressure on the company. Many employees were angered by a report by The Washington Post that retirement benefits were being changed.

The policy change would have switched 401(k) matching contributions to an annual lump sum, rather than being distributed throughout the year with every paycheck. The switch would have punished employees who quit or were fired mid-year. It would also have cost employees who stayed, since they would not see the benefits of compounding in their retirement accounts.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/aol-chief-reverses-changes-to-401k-policy-after-a-week-of-bad-publicity/2014/02/08/0aec4056-911f-11e3-b227-12a45d109e03_story.html

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AOL chief reverses changes to 401(k) policy after a week of bad publicity (Original Post) jsr Feb 2014 OP
Any business that Aol touches, I have decided to boycott ... MindMover Feb 2014 #1
they got called out on their bullshit Skittles Feb 2014 #2
he'd do it again in a New York second if he thought rurallib Feb 2014 #3
+1 blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #13
Another pompous fool gets to eat crow. nt bemildred Feb 2014 #4
What about the healthcare coveraged? Iliyah Feb 2014 #5
I still won't read Huffpo. nt valerief Feb 2014 #6
The reason why Assholic AOL wants to pay their 401(K) at the end of the year??? TheBlackAdder Feb 2014 #7
I got laid off once the day before I vested in pension money. anasv Feb 2014 #9
And they thought you wouldn't notice? Brigid Feb 2014 #11
I noticed. anasv Feb 2014 #16
Sunlight is a good thing Gothmog Feb 2014 #8
Only one of 2 possible conclusions daybranch Feb 2014 #10
FUCK YOU Zo Zig Feb 2014 #12
WELCOME! DeSwiss Feb 2014 #14
kick OKNancy Feb 2014 #15
now they're saying this jerk anasv Feb 2014 #17

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
5. What about the healthcare coveraged?
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 09:55 AM
Feb 2014

These assholes always protecting the unborned but once born they do not give a shit about them.

TheBlackAdder

(28,209 posts)
7. The reason why Assholic AOL wants to pay their 401(K) at the end of the year???
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 12:20 PM
Feb 2014
It's not to keep their employees from jumping ship...


People generally stay until the new year because:


1) Companies don't like hiring new talent in November and December. They hire employees in January or February after all bonuses and perks are awarded. A late-year hire might also affect holiday pay, sick pay, etc. It also adds another employee on the roster before the new year. Now, I'm not talking temp employees--these are full-time hires.


2) Some people don't like jumping ship towards the end of the year for stability purposes.


===


AOL might be doing this because:


1) They can fire someone's ass on December 24th, giving them a nice Christmas present, knowing the employee won't even be able to tap into their 401(k) money in the event of an emergency.


2) AOL might be able to save that 1.25% interest on the money they would have lost by paying gradually through the year.


3) BONUS POOL. They can decide who to fire in December to free up money to pay out in bonuses. If the returns aren't that favorable... fire a few more staffers and that 'saved' 401(k) money can be used to fund the bonuses for executives.



===


I haven't seen many people mention these employer tricks in regards to this topic.

daybranch

(1,309 posts)
10. Only one of 2 possible conclusions
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 06:40 PM
Feb 2014

He either is very stupid about how Obamacare affects his company or he lied? Stupidity or deceitfulness, in either case the shareholders should throw him out. Take that back, in either case he is stupid as we can see by his actions. Yep. the one percent must work harder(sarcasm!), because he is proof they are not smarter. Bye Bye Chairman.

Zo Zig

(600 posts)
12. FUCK YOU
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 10:21 PM
Feb 2014

Now say "I am sorry to the individual that you singled out as being the reason why the policy was changed. Try walking in their shoes now, after what you have done. And sorry in a fucking email don't cut it scumbag."
YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT!
You have no decency, and are not a member of hominid species in my estimation.

 

anasv

(225 posts)
17. now they're saying this jerk
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 04:26 PM
Feb 2014

violated healthcare privacy. There's an article in the Times that I'm too lazy to go look up again.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»AOL chief reverses change...