Nation's first new nuclear plant expected to secure $6.5 billion in federal loan guarantees
Source: Associated Press
The Energy Department is poised to approve $6.5 billion in federal loan guarantees for the first nuclear power plants built from scratch in this country in more than three decades.
Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz was expected to announce final approval of the deal at a speech on Wednesday, a day before he visits the $14 billion Vogtle nuclear plant now under construction in eastern Georgia.
Three government officials familiar with the deal confirmed its details Tuesday. They asked not to be identified because the deal has not been made public.
<snip>
Georgia Public Service Commissioner Stan Wise said state officials have been invited to a signing ceremony Thursday. He had not been briefed on the terms.
<snip>
Government officials familiar with the deal said two loan guarantees totaling $6.5 billion will be offered to Georgia Power, a Southern subsidiary, and Oglethorpe Power Co., a partner on the project. A separate agreement guaranteeing $1.8 billion was still being negotiated with a third Vogtle partner, the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia.
Read more: http://www.dallasnews.com/business/energy/20140218-energy-department-ready-to-approve-6.5-billion-in-loan-guarantees-for-nation-s-first-nuclear-plant-in-three-decades.ece?nclick_check=1
This is a huge step backwards.
The loan application period was extended seven times - they should never have allowed that.
bananas
(27,509 posts)U.S. to announce $6.5 billion loan deal for Southern Co nuclear plant
By Ayesha Rascoe
WASHINGTON Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:36pm EST
<snip>
The conditional agreement totaling $8.3 billion provided loan aid to Southern's Georgia Power unit as well as project co-owners Oglethorpe Power and Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG).
While loan assistance to Georgia Power and Oglethorpe will be finalized Wednesday, the $1.8 billion loan guarantee to MEAG remains outstanding.
The Department of Energy said on Tuesday that U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz would make a major announcement about the administration's "all of the above" energy strategy and a "path toward a low carbon energy future" at the National Press Club on Wednesday at 12:30 p.m. EST.
The department declined to comment about the specifics of the announcement.
<snip>
wordpix
(18,652 posts)whatever the deal is. And so is Obama's, who originally proposed $60 billion in guaranteed loans for building these nukes.
snip: "Georgia Public Service Commissioner Stan Wise said state officials have been invited to a signing ceremony Thursday. He had not been briefed on the terms. "
peoli
(3,111 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)strikes again! Let's see how the apologists spin this one.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Its disgusting
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)newfie11
(8,159 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)I predict that not a single national Republican nor tea party group will utter a word against this example of "government picking winners and losers against the free hand of the market".
Bonduel
(96 posts)you might see some complaining, but I don't think this nuclear plant will go bankrupt. This is a good investment IMO
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)Or in most cases they wouldn't even exist. And no companies could have afforded the massive R&D costs of developing nuclear power if weren't for off the charts military spending on nuclear weapons. They are counting on the federal government to solve the waste problems for them also.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Investors won't invest in this risky business. But dummy politicians including Pres. O backed it.
FBaggins
(26,737 posts)Then how did they build as much of it as they have already?
And more importantly... how is the other new plant getting built when the power company isn't interested in the government backing?
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)It is hard to think of any industry that has ever been as dependent on support from the federal government as the nuclear power industry has been:
https://www.citizen.org/documents/Price%20Anderson%20Factsheet.pdf
FBaggins
(26,737 posts)It's based on the faulty assumption that, without PA, nuclear reactors would have to carry enough insurance to cover a worst-case accident. This would be too expensive and thus they would never be built.
That simply isn't the case. No industry is required to carry sufficient insurance to cover the worst imaginable event. In reality, nuclear plants carry more insurance due to PA than they would be likely to carry without it.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)It almost sounds like that is how you are spinning it. Yeah right. I'm sure they pulled out all of the stops to kill it but those pesky environmentalists shoved it down their throats.
FBaggins
(26,737 posts)It had definite advantages... just not existential ones..
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)they dispose of the waste? What is the source of water for cooling?
I thought Georgia was suffering from a water shortage? More of the bipartisan profit at all cost climate deniers? "When will we ever learn?"
Lost_Count
(555 posts)Sounds good...
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Epic FAIL
peoli
(3,111 posts)Steerpike
(2,692 posts)It only takes one nuclear accident to ruin your whole day...
wordpix
(18,652 posts)This should never have been approved but it's the way things are done in the good ol USA and Obama approved
jsr
(7,712 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)It has been way to long; hope this is the first of many more to come!