Tesla plans new battery factory, will employ 6,500
Source: Associated Press
Electric car maker Tesla Motors said Wednesday it's considering sites in Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas for a massive battery factory that would employ around 6,500 people.
The company didn't immediately name the locations it's considering in those states. Tesla plans to start construction this year and complete the factory -- which it dubs its "Gigafactory" -- in 2017.
.......
The new factory will provide enough batteries to supply 500,000 vehicles by 2020, Tesla said. Tesla expects to produce 35,000 vehicles this year.
Tesla currently sells just one vehicle, the Model S sedan, which starts around $70,000. But it plans to begin making a crossover, the Model X, later this year, and wants to bring a lower cost, mass market vehicle to market in 2017. Tesla said the factory would help lower its battery costs by around 30 percent.
Read more: http://m.detnews.com/topstories/article?a=2014302260094&f=1207
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)civilized word
Bryce Butler
(338 posts)since they're banned from selling to consumers there.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Make part of the deal them coming here, is that the Car Dealers are told to go take a flying fuck at a rolling donut.
doc03
(35,345 posts)believe in electric cars anyway. But apparently they want cheap scab labor.
daleo
(21,317 posts)It seems more sensible in the long run. Especially for a firm which is environmentally progressive.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)Zorro
(15,740 posts)Not that far from the Tesla plant.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)The only real downside I can think of is that I-80 closes to truck traffic during winter storms, but that would be an infrequent problem and one that could be planned around in most cases.
NickB79
(19,253 posts)If the long-term predictions for climate change hold, in the next few decades we'll be abandoning large parts of that region back to nature as long-term droughts set in and the reservoirs and snowpack fail to satisfy water demands for agriculture, manufacturing and residential use.
Bill76
(39 posts)With their history of explosions, only a desperate undocumented immigrant would take a job there.
TekGryphon
(430 posts)How many Tesla batteries have exploded? Or did Rush not give you that statistic.
Mother Muckraker
(116 posts)Nov 2013 - 3 workers burned by hot metal:
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/3-workers-burned-at-Tesla-plant-4980999.php
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)Sheesh.
Mother Muckraker
(116 posts)Read again. I posted 2 incidents. One in 2011 and the other in 2013
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)No explosions, ever. BTW, the computer directed each vehicle to safety in each of the three fire cases.
Bill76
(39 posts)Or don't, if you prefer.
Mother Muckraker
(116 posts)http://www.thestreet.com/story/12459570/1/heres-the-biggest-risk-with-teslas-gigafactory.html
From their 10-K filing:
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)i mean seriously. he's nothing but failure to you, but there is that little thing called reality.
Mother Muckraker
(116 posts)The researchers found that batteries using cathodes with nickel and cobalt and solvent-based electrode processing are the highest risks for negative health and environmental impacts. These impacts are a result of the production, processing and use of cobalt and nickel metal compounds. The environmental impacts include resource depletion, global warming, and ecological toxicity while the health impacts are poor respiratory, pulmonary and neurological effects.
To lessen such impacts, the study recommends cathode material substitution, recycling of metals from the batteries and solvent-less electrode processing.
The study also found that the electricity grids for charging lithium-ion batteries contribute to global warming and other environmental and health impacts.
These impacts are sensitive to local and regional grid mixes, Amarakoon said. If the batteries in use are drawing power from the grids in the Midwest or South, much of the electricity will be coming from coal-fired plants. If its in New England or California, the grids rely more on renewables and natural gas, which emit less greenhouse gases and other toxic pollutants."
Redford
(373 posts)The other states are just a diversion. Site is already picked out and politicians greased.