Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 07:03 PM Mar 2014

U.S. 'Suspends' Role in Russia G8 Summit After Obama, Putin Speak

Source: NBC News

The U.S. is preparing to pull out of the next summit of industrialized nations — scheduled in Russia — in protest of Russian military moves in Ukraine, the White House said Saturday after President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke directly by phone.

As tension in Ukraine threatened to boil over, Obama told Putin in the 90-minute call that he was deeply concerned over Russia's "clear violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity," the White House said in a statement, adding that the president warned Putin that Russia's "standing in the international community" was at stake.

The statement said the U.S. was suspending "upcoming participation in preparatory meetings" for the G-8 summit scheduled for June in Sochi, Russia.

"Going forward, Russia's continued violation of international law will lead to greater political and economic isolation," it promised.

Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ukraine-crisis/u-s-suspends-role-russia-g8-summit-after-obama-putin-n42116



http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/01/readout-president-obama-s-call-president-putin

Official link above
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. 'Suspends' Role in Russia G8 Summit After Obama, Putin Speak (Original Post) steve2470 Mar 2014 OP
This is what you get when you put a right-wing fascist at the helm of power: fascism & dictatorship. BlueCaliDem Mar 2014 #1
By then Crimea will have had its referendum - now due 30th March. dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #2
Self-determination would solve this. After seeing that brute slapping around an employee freshwest Mar 2014 #3
Aside from which dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #4
I think he believes in the principle above what the USA may get one way or the other. freshwest Mar 2014 #6
Interesting concept: letting people vote on which country they want to be citizens of. pampango Mar 2014 #9
Really only works in a confined area. dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #10
And if the referendum effectively changes the nationality of Crimeans pampango Mar 2014 #14
What about all the minority-majority areas? JackRiddler Mar 2014 #13
Doesn't get the approved outcome. Igel Mar 2014 #21
It's probably inevitable that this (and future) Administrations will covertly provide arewenotdemo Mar 2014 #42
I think a split may be the only peaceful way to end this. PFunk Mar 2014 #19
Which will not include Sevastopol. Igel Mar 2014 #20
OH, OH!!! That'll leave a mark...NOT! Purveyor Mar 2014 #5
What's so fucking funny? Cha Mar 2014 #15
That some how the 'west' pulling out of the G8 is a big fucking deal, that is Purveyor Mar 2014 #16
Who said it was a big fucking deal.. President Obama is taking a stand Cha Mar 2014 #17
Well, it is a big fucking deal and the only one behaving in a "funny" fashion is you on this thread. MADem Mar 2014 #25
He can get all from Italy. 840high Mar 2014 #26
"Italy" is the west. nt MADem Mar 2014 #29
Pootie needs customers for his gas and oil. amandabeech Mar 2014 #27
Fair point. Not doing business w/him wouldn't help his situation. nt MADem Mar 2014 #31
Sour grapes after the CIA backed coup backfired n/t cosmicone Mar 2014 #7
It has been alluded to elsewhere dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #12
No, it's not.. it's a stand against Putin invading the Ukraine. Cha Mar 2014 #18
Therein lies the fallacy... cosmicone Mar 2014 #23
No fallacy.. but, by all means Proceed with your conspiracy Cha Mar 2014 #33
What is "little Hillary Avatar" supposed to mean? cosmicone Mar 2014 #34
No not at all, I'm sure she'll make a great President when and if the time comes. Right now though.. Cha Mar 2014 #35
The first of many nonviolent, diplomatic responses to violence. As it should be. n/t pampango Mar 2014 #8
We do not have a legal leg to stand on Wet Willie Mar 2014 #11
Consider Assad and al-Sisi. Igel Mar 2014 #22
Yunukovytch was not trying to change the country cosmicone Mar 2014 #24
We, the EU and the Russians have guaranteed the territorial integrity of Ukraine in a amandabeech Mar 2014 #28
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #30
You may see an invite, but I don't. amandabeech Mar 2014 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #36
Ha! amandabeech Mar 2014 #37
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #38
She's got YOUR number, tovarich. nt MADem Mar 2014 #39
Well, I guess it's more than a strongly worded letter. 1000words Mar 2014 #40
And He Was Right to Do So Wolf Frankula Mar 2014 #41

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
1. This is what you get when you put a right-wing fascist at the helm of power: fascism & dictatorship.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 07:12 PM
Mar 2014

We know that all too well with the astroturf, billionaire-backed rise of the Republitarians a.k.a. Teabaggers.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
2. By then Crimea will have had its referendum - now due 30th March.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 07:13 PM
Mar 2014

Wouldn't say there'd be much doubt about the outcome and there is nothing to indicate Russia has any interests elsewhere in the Ukraine although other parts of the Ukraine may themselves decide other wise in terms of splitting the country in two - the west has vested interests in trading with the EU and the east with Russia.

Maybe economic isolation from the US but not necessarily others.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
3. Self-determination would solve this. After seeing that brute slapping around an employee
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 07:20 PM
Mar 2014
in the prosecutor's office in Kiev, no doubt some ethnic Russians will want to move east anyway. No love lost there.



dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
4. Aside from which
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 07:23 PM
Mar 2014

to quote Obama directly "The people of Ukraine have the right to determine their own future."

The fact he may like the outcome is a different matter.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
6. I think he believes in the principle above what the USA may get one way or the other.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 07:39 PM
Mar 2014

To me, it's all about respect. Which Shrub and many others in this country fail to recognize.


pampango

(24,692 posts)
9. Interesting concept: letting people vote on which country they want to be citizens of.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 07:49 PM
Mar 2014

If applied equitably around the world it could produce some interesting results.

It would certainly put the people's aspirations above national sovereignty and territorial integrity. (I used to think that Putin was a big believer in national sovereignty and territorial integrity.)

Given the location of many national borders relative to the ethnicity of the people inside those borders, we could see some big changes in national boundaries if the "Crimean referendum plan" were applied globally.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
10. Really only works in a confined area.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 08:04 PM
Mar 2014

There were a lot of seriously pissed off Slovakians when the majority voted to split from Czechoslovakia.

btw there may be a difference between what Crimea is doing and what other parts of Ukraine decide to do. Crimea could decide to actually become part of Russia again as it once was or become a small state like Luxembourg.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
14. And if the referendum effectively changes the nationality of Crimeans
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 08:17 PM
Mar 2014

that will be a defeat for national sovereignty and territorial integrity and a victory for people.

It would be a great precedent for people in many other places who feel estranged from their countrymen and perhaps feel a kinship for people on the other side of a line on a map. The counter argument that they are not in a "confined area" may not be persuasive.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
13. What about all the minority-majority areas?
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 08:15 PM
Mar 2014

Okay, so Missouri secedes as a White Christian Republic. Does St. Louis get to secede from that? What about the neighborhoods that want to elsewhere.

This is not the way.

Igel

(35,359 posts)
21. Doesn't get the approved outcome.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 09:43 PM
Mar 2014

Not allowed.

Same for the Tatars. Those that the Russians ethnically cleansed in an attempt at genocide. They'll again be part and parcel with Russia, even though they oppose it.

You draw the borders to ensure the right majority. It's called "gerrymandering."

 

arewenotdemo

(2,364 posts)
42. It's probably inevitable that this (and future) Administrations will covertly provide
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 03:42 AM
Mar 2014

the Tatars with the "non-lethal" aid they need to attack the Crimean "regime".

Igel

(35,359 posts)
20. Which will not include Sevastopol.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 09:40 PM
Mar 2014

All the Putin-defending (or Russia-defending, not that there's a big difference) notwithstanding, at some point part of Crimea that is not autonomous will either have to have an illegal uprising--the kind that Putin claims gives him rights in all of Ukraine--or Russia will have to violate an international treaty and invade part of Ukraine.

Odds are such trivia will be ignored because they're irritating and don't fit the necessary story.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
16. That some how the 'west' pulling out of the G8 is a big fucking deal, that is
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 08:52 PM
Mar 2014

what is so funny.

Russia doesn't need a fucking thing from the west...nothing!

Cha

(297,733 posts)
17. Who said it was a big fucking deal.. President Obama is taking a stand
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 09:06 PM
Mar 2014

against Putin invading the Ukraine.

"But Obama responded that the appropriate way to address those issues is peacefully "through direct engagement with the government of Ukraine," the U.N. Security Council or the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the White House said."

Nothing hilarious about it, imo.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
25. Well, it is a big fucking deal and the only one behaving in a "funny" fashion is you on this thread.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 10:54 PM
Mar 2014

Russia doesn't need a fucking thing from the west...really?

Pootie will have to adjust his taste in ties, suits and shoes, for starters...

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
27. Pootie needs customers for his gas and oil.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 11:46 PM
Mar 2014

If I were in the EU, I'd be looking to conserve gas and oil and look elsewhere for supplies.

No one wants to be dependent on someone who doesn't give a flying f about anyone or anything and generally acts like a thug.

No one. Not even the Chinese want to be dependent on someone like that for crucial supplies.

So while Pootie probably feels like a big man right now, he may not feel that way in a few years, because fewer customers will want to give such an unreliable supplier much of their business.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
12. It has been alluded to elsewhere
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 08:07 PM
Mar 2014

that this is actually the US response to the Syria issue which if true reflects Russia's attitude to the Libya issue re. the bent UN resolution.

Cha

(297,733 posts)
18. No, it's not.. it's a stand against Putin invading the Ukraine.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 09:07 PM
Mar 2014
"But Obama responded that the appropriate way to address those issues is peacefully "through direct engagement with the government of Ukraine," the U.N. Security Council or the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the White House said."
 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
23. Therein lies the fallacy...
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 10:33 PM
Mar 2014

WHICH government of Ukraine? The democratically elected Yanukovytch or the CIA installed Yahtsenyuk is supposed to be involved in "direct engagement?"

Cha

(297,733 posts)
33. No fallacy.. but, by all means Proceed with your conspiracy
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 12:23 AM
Mar 2014

theory with your little Hillary Avatar.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
34. What is "little Hillary Avatar" supposed to mean?
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 12:26 AM
Mar 2014

Is it now offensive to support Hillary on DU?

Cha

(297,733 posts)
35. No not at all, I'm sure she'll make a great President when and if the time comes. Right now though..
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 12:34 AM
Mar 2014
 

Wet Willie

(52 posts)
11. We do not have a legal leg to stand on
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 08:05 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Sat Mar 1, 2014, 08:41 PM - Edit history (1)

So, if Russia has been invited in by Crimea Gov officials, as well as the democratically elected leader of the Ukraine, how is this an "invasion" or violation of Ukraine's "Territorial integrity"?

Because some armed thugs in Kiev who violently overthrew the democratically elected government says so?

Hmmm... I wonder how we would respond if a tea-party-ish gang of thugs violently overthrew the democratically elected government in Canada... would we support the thugs or the democratically elected head of state?

Igel

(35,359 posts)
22. Consider Assad and al-Sisi.
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 09:49 PM
Mar 2014

If Morsi invites the IDF to invade, that's okay?

How about the way that Russia is defending the elected government of Syria?

Somehow I don't think many of those broad-brushing the Maidan folk and defending the Berkut and Yanukovich are really being consistent. It's hard to see what the principle is, either. It's not defending popular votes. It's not defending citizens against oppression. It's not just being anti-US/CIA/Obama or pro-SovPutin and his Russland Allein.

There are a few principles at play, and some are fairly retrograde while others aren't obviously so.

In some cases, gunning down people is public service. In other cases, merely rescinding rights with no obvious consequences is evil most foul.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
24. Yunukovytch was not trying to change the country
Sat Mar 1, 2014, 10:37 PM
Mar 2014

to observe Sharia law like Morsi and Yanukovytch was not killing minorities like coptic christians like Morsi.

Plain and simple distinction.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
28. We, the EU and the Russians have guaranteed the territorial integrity of Ukraine in a
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 12:03 AM
Mar 2014

1994 treaty. Russia has violated that integrity by actions that exceed what is allowed in connection with the lease of the military bases in Crimea. Russia has violated the treaty.

No party guaranteed that there would never be an irregular change of presidents or governments.

If Canada had a presidential system of government, which it does not, I assume that we would be worried if any irregular change in president occurred. We might beef up our border crossings or put some troops on alert. After that, we'd take a wait and see attitude. We might make plans to evacuate Americans if fighting broke out. We'd also be in serious consultations with the British, who I assume would be extremely anxious. However, I don't think that we would be threatening to roll the tanks into Ottawa unless we were attacked.

Putin, with the Russian language media, has hopped up a lot of Russian citizens and ethnic Russians in Ukraine because he wants to re-create the Soviet Union and he can't do that without a lot of Ukraine coming home to mother Russia. He cannot get over the fact that over twenty years have passed since the Cold War came to an end and fourteen years after the 20th century came to an end. The rest of us have said good riddance to both of them and moved on. It's time for him and his friends to do the same.





Response to amandabeech (Reply #28)

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
32. You may see an invite, but I don't.
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 12:17 AM
Mar 2014

You seem to be very pleased that a country at peace with its neighbors--one that had not fired a shot at its neighbors--has been invaded.

Yes, they're having internal problems, but I have seen no reports that one bullet has crossed their frontier and no reports that even one bullet has been fired into any of the Crimean bases that the Russians have leased.

The type of invite that you seem to see is the type that 20th century dictators always seemed to receive just before they started WWI and WWII.

I'm not cheering for the start of another hellish European civil war, and for the life of me I can't figure out why anyone here at DU with any sense of history is happy.

That is all.

Response to amandabeech (Reply #32)

Response to amandabeech (Reply #37)

Wolf Frankula

(3,602 posts)
41. And He Was Right to Do So
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 03:28 AM
Mar 2014

The United States is no longer an industrialized nation. Our economy is based on the export of agricultural products, natural resources, and selling each other pieces of paper. That sound like industry to you?

Wolf

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. 'Suspends' Role in R...