Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 11:46 AM Mar 2014

New Donetsk governor says Russians behind east Ukraine clashes

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - The new governor of the eastern Ukrainian region of Donetsk on Friday said Russians were behind violent clashes between rival demonstrators in which one man was killed, and accused Moscow of distorting the truth in its account of what happened.

Dmitriy Chernyavskiy, 22, was stabbed to death in Donetsk, the heartland of Ukraine's Russian-speaking coalfields, after pro-Russian protesters clashed with others favoring European integration and denouncing Russia's incursion into Crimea.

Four of 29 people injured received hospital treatment.

"Sadly, we note that there were, according to police, a lot of people concentrated there who were not from Ukraine," Serhiy Taruta told journalists in an oblique reference to Russia.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/14/us-ukraine-crisis-donetsk-idUSBREA2D13L20140314

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Donetsk governor says Russians behind east Ukraine clashes (Original Post) steve2470 Mar 2014 OP
Keep in mind who Serhiy Taruta is: snappyturtle Mar 2014 #1
Sergei Taruta says Donetsk is under complete control. rdharma Mar 2014 #3
Putin is citing this as a possible reason to invade nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #2
We've got to get organized! rdharma Mar 2014 #4
eh, some of us oppose militarism and war and imperialism on principle, not just geek tragedy Mar 2014 #5
Good! That means that you are also against putsches of democratically elected governments........ rdharma Mar 2014 #6
sure when they happen, not when the state media of an imperialist power like geek tragedy Mar 2014 #7
Oh, it happened alright! rdharma Mar 2014 #8
I would call it a president abdicating power by fleeing the country geek tragedy Mar 2014 #9
I would call it rule of the mob..... rdharma Mar 2014 #10
sure you would, that's what the Russian propaganda outlets are calling it geek tragedy Mar 2014 #13
"Some demonstrators were indeed nationalists." rdharma Mar 2014 #21
that's a far cry from "this was a Neo-Nazi putsch" nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #22
What many don't realize is the loss of income to Ukraine that the snappyturtle Mar 2014 #11
The New York Times has reported just a few minutes ago that F.M. Lavrov amandabeech Mar 2014 #12
The word of the Russian ambassador is meaningless, imo. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #14
What about the word of Victoria Nuland? arewenotdemo Mar 2014 #15
there was no American-orchestrated regime change in Ukraine. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #16
Are you kidding? What was the conversation between Nuland and the US Ambassador arewenotdemo Mar 2014 #17
why did the Ukrainian people protest against Yanukovych, in your opinion? nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #20
What I've read/heard is that he opted for the Russian bailout. arewenotdemo Mar 2014 #28
that's not an answer. why did the people of the Ukraine protest and want this guy out? nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #30
Of course it's an answer. arewenotdemo Mar 2014 #35
that was what the Ukrainian people cared most about--enough to drive him out?nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #37
Possibly many things. Igel Mar 2014 #39
I'm sure Russia won't invade Eastern Ukraine. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #18
Well, who knows. amandabeech Mar 2014 #19
Where is that? Which cities are you talking about? nt rdharma Mar 2014 #24
Currently? Simferopol, Sevastapol, a few others. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #27
Those cities are in Crimea......NOT Ukraine. rdharma Mar 2014 #31
As per recognized international treaty to which Russia was a signatory.... Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #33
As per the ICJ ruling on the independence of Kosovo....... Crimea is legally independent. rdharma Mar 2014 #34
Is it really indepedent? Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #36
We'll see. Maybe they want to become part of Russia. Referendum in two days. nt rdharma Mar 2014 #38
And so's Chechnya. Igel Mar 2014 #40
What does the ICJ opinion on Kosovo have to do with Chechnya? rdharma Mar 2014 #41
Russia won't invade eastern Ukraine. arewenotdemo Mar 2014 #25
There is video. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #23
Murdoch directed VICE NEWS........ really? rdharma Mar 2014 #26
You can't deny what you can see. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #29
"Reportedly" Murdoch Jr. is the DIRECTOR of VICE NEWS.......... nt rdharma Mar 2014 #32
kick OKNancy Mar 2014 #42

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
1. Keep in mind who Serhiy Taruta is:
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 12:06 PM
Mar 2014
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26487096

snip....


The protesters' unofficial leader is Pavel Gubarev. He describes himself as the people's governor but his virtual regime in Donetsk lasted less than a week.

On Thursday, as he was preparing for a BBC interview, police officers came to arrest him.

"I will charge you with attempting to resist," an investigator warned a Gubarev supporter.

snip...

The offensive against the pro-Russian demonstrators has been led by Donetsk's new governor, Sergei Taruta. He's a billionaire businessman and one of the oligarchs recruited by the new authorities in Kiev to assert authority in the regions.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
3. Sergei Taruta says Donetsk is under complete control.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 12:42 PM
Mar 2014

Unlike the Koch brothers in the US, the Urainian oligarchs don't need to buy their government..... They just get themselves appointed to positions where they can RUN the government directly. A real "hands on" approach.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
5. eh, some of us oppose militarism and war and imperialism on principle, not just
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:01 PM
Mar 2014

when the US does it.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
6. Good! That means that you are also against putsches of democratically elected governments........
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:08 PM
Mar 2014

Right?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. sure when they happen, not when the state media of an imperialist power like
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:12 PM
Mar 2014

Russia says they happen.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
8. Oh, it happened alright!
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:19 PM
Mar 2014

Or what would you call it?

"Imperialist power", eh? You don't feel even a bit silly for throwing that out there?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. I would call it a president abdicating power by fleeing the country
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:22 PM
Mar 2014

rather than face legal accountability for his crimes in office. And then being removed from office by a virtually unanimous vote of the country's legally elected representatives due to his abdication. (no he can't rule Ukraine from a shopping mall in Russia)

Better question is how you don't feel silly denying that Russia is a militaristic, imperialist bully.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
10. I would call it rule of the mob.....
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:26 PM
Mar 2014

....spearheaded by RW fascists and supported by foreign corporatists and intelligence agencies.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
13. sure you would, that's what the Russian propaganda outlets are calling it
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:33 PM
Mar 2014

But, that claim is merely apologia for Russian abuses and crimes

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/13/ukraine-uprising-fascist-coup-grassroots-movement?CMP=twt_gu

With Ukraine on the brink of invasion and division, most people in Kiev blame the country's troubles on the former president. "This is Yanukovych's fault," Zhenia, a pensioner, said, surveying the battleground in Institutska Street, where many were gunned down. She was crying.

Nearby, visitors bowed before makeshift brick shrines, some decorated with gas masks and helmets. Others crossed themselves. One child's drawing said: "Eternal glory to the heroes".

According to those who took part in it, the uprising was a broad-based grassroots movement, launched by people fed up with Yanukovych and involving all sections of society. Some demonstrators were indeed nationalists. Others were liberals, socialists and libertarians. There were Christians and atheists. There were workers from the provinces, as well as IT geeks from Kiev more at home with MacBooks than molotovs.


You can have the last word, since it's apparent you're just repeating the party line from Moscow, which got tedious weeks ago.



 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
21. "Some demonstrators were indeed nationalists."
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:16 PM
Mar 2014

"Nationalists"...... in this case that's a nice way to say "neo-Nazi thugs". The Sturmabteilung (SA) that lead the "peaceful demonstrations" in Kiev were the Right Sector and Svoboda. That's a fact.

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
11. What many don't realize is the loss of income to Ukraine that the
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:31 PM
Mar 2014

Russia Federation pays the Ukraine to lease its port, etc. Makes me
wonder with whom Ukraine's best interest should be allied...the oligarchs,
ultra-nationalists or Russia? Plus, signing on with the EU will bring
NATO into the picture.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
12. The New York Times has reported just a few minutes ago that F.M. Lavrov
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:32 PM
Mar 2014

told Sec. Kerrey that Russia would not invade southern or eastern Ukraine.

If true, it is a very positive sign, and takes some of the pressure off for now.

Russia refuses to remove troops from Crimea or to order them back to the Russian-leased military bases, and insists that the "election" will go forward on Sunday.

CNBC reported within the last few minutes that the ballot to be used in Ukraine does not have an option to vote to stay within Ukraine, either with increased autonomy or with the status quo ante.

The only possible votes are for autonomy or immediate absorption into Russia.

If CNBC is right, Russia insults the intelligence of Crimeans with a parody of a free and fair election with the ballot itself.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. The word of the Russian ambassador is meaningless, imo.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:37 PM
Mar 2014

But, I would think it unlikely just because the response from the rest of the world would cripple Russia's economy for a decade, not to mention giving it Afghanistan Redux on its border.

 

arewenotdemo

(2,364 posts)
15. What about the word of Victoria Nuland?
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:47 PM
Mar 2014

Consider for a second what the American response to a Russian-orchestrated regime change in Canada or Mexico would be.



 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
16. there was no American-orchestrated regime change in Ukraine.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:51 PM
Mar 2014

Please stop insulting the Ukrainians who took to the streets to protest the horrid corruption and abuses of the Yanukovych regime by implying they are unthinking automatons being manipulated by vastly more intelligent beings from the Western hemisphere.

Yankukovych lost legitimacy in the eyes of the Ukrainian people, was in danger of having his outright theft of billions of dollars from the people of Ukraine exposed, and fled rather than face prosecution.

repeating the big lie from Moscow doesn't make it any more true

 

arewenotdemo

(2,364 posts)
17. Are you kidding? What was the conversation between Nuland and the US Ambassador
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:58 PM
Mar 2014

but a decision on who was in and who was out of the new government?

 

arewenotdemo

(2,364 posts)
28. What I've read/heard is that he opted for the Russian bailout.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:25 PM
Mar 2014

Seems it was one more politically fragile country....like Syria, IMO.

The sort that a global power could break apart at the opportune moment, if it so wished.

 

arewenotdemo

(2,364 posts)
35. Of course it's an answer.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:51 PM
Mar 2014

In a politically-volatile situation, Yanukovych sided with Russia instead of the the EU and the US.

Which is not at all acceptable by Washington standards.



Igel

(35,317 posts)
39. Possibly many things.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 03:11 PM
Mar 2014

The problem is a kind of non-reasoning called abduction.

Logic:
All men are mortal.
Socrates is a man.
Therefore Socrates is mortal.

Abductive reasoning:
All men are mortal.
Socrates is mortal.
Therefore Socrates is a man.

Sounds right, completely logical, and therefore true?

What if I said that Socrates was what I called my cat? Cats are also mortal. This is a kind of hypothesis-formation strategy. But it's often believed to indicate logical proof. It's not proof. It makes a possible claim.

The conversation is compatible with collusion and such. It's compatible with a number of interpretations. But since it has an interpretation that fits what you want to think, that must be its only true interpretation.

Helping this along is the frame, the spin, that the conversation was presented with. You were primed. My kid yesterday used the strange metaphor "cold as a corpse" and my wife looked at him strangely. I reminded her that we were canoeing and there were lily pads that were reaching up towards the surface. My kid said they looked like hands, and I responded, "Yeah, the cold, dead hands of those who drowned, reaching up for you." He laughed at the macabre nature of my allusion. But "dead hands" calls to mind corpses. He was cold later and "cold as a corpse" came to mind because, hours later, those particular associations were activated in his brain and hadn't yet reached rest state. He was primed to associate "cold" with "corpse." It was an easy "reach" for his brain, even if he wasn't sure why it was such an easy reach. He'd forgotten I'd said that.

So the frame you heard the conversation in told you what you'd be hearing. You were primed. And what you remember is the inference you drew, not the priming. That's good Madison Avenue advertising techniques, a way of manipulating the public to buy goods and ideas. (It's what Lakoff thinks all good (D) should do. Manipulate people like he says the (R) do.)

But many wanted to hear that anyway. It's very hard work to fight priming, and even harder work to fight confirmation bias.

I have a list of things I think they should be required to teach in high school. Gricean maxims. Priming. Substitution heuristics when it comes to thinking.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
18. I'm sure Russia won't invade Eastern Ukraine.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:01 PM
Mar 2014

I'm also sure many mysterious men in green insignia-less uniforms driving Russian tanks will soon appear in Eastern Ukraine.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
27. Currently? Simferopol, Sevastapol, a few others.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:23 PM
Mar 2014

But I wouldn't be surprised if we see some in Donetsk very soon.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
31. Those cities are in Crimea......NOT Ukraine.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:36 PM
Mar 2014

I guess you haven't heard the news...... Crimea has declared its independence and is no longer a part of Ukraine.

I'm sure you'll write a retraction when your predicted Donetsk scenario doesn't occur as you're predicting.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
33. As per recognized international treaty to which Russia was a signatory....
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:43 PM
Mar 2014

....they are part of Ukraine, like it or not.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
34. As per the ICJ ruling on the independence of Kosovo....... Crimea is legally independent.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:50 PM
Mar 2014

Or is it only "legal" when it suits you?

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
36. Is it really indepedent?
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:53 PM
Mar 2014

Given that since arrival of the Non-Russian-Russian-Brigade, Russian Flags have been flying everywhere.

Igel

(35,317 posts)
40. And so's Chechnya.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 03:14 PM
Mar 2014

You know, an autonomous republic wanting to split from a larger political entity with which it shares scant historical or ethnic ties?

Russia screwed that pooch long before Kosovo.

 

arewenotdemo

(2,364 posts)
25. Russia won't invade eastern Ukraine.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:21 PM
Mar 2014

For one thing, it would have much less influence in what would become the new Ukraine.

Ukraine without Crimea is already much less Russian.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
26. Murdoch directed VICE NEWS........ really?
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:23 PM
Mar 2014

Murdoch Jr's very own version of daddy's FOX NEWS. Right on!

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
29. You can't deny what you can see.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:27 PM
Mar 2014

Spin all you want.

(FWIW, Murdoch's investment is reportedly all of 5%).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New Donetsk governor says...