Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 11:23 AM Mar 2014

Poll: Ukraine crisis hurts Obama approval ratings

Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — Foreign policy used to stand out as a not-so-bleak spot in the public’s waning assessment of Barack Obama. Not anymore. He’s getting low marks for handling Russia’s swoop into Ukraine, and more Americans than ever disapprove of the way Obama is doing his job, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll.

Despite the poor performance reviews, Obama’s primary tactic so far — imposing economic sanctions on key Russians — has strong backing.

Close to 9 out of 10 Americans support sanctions as a response to Russia’s annexation of the Crimean Peninsula, the poll indicates. About half of that group says the U.S. sanctions so far are about right, while the other half wants to see them strengthened, the AP-GfK poll found.

Most Democrats say the sanctions were OK, while a majority of Republicans find them too weak.

Read more: http://www.salon.com/2014/03/27/poll_ukraine_crisis_hurts_obama_approval_ratings/

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
1. Obama did what any other President would have done--but the difference is, he has
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 11:31 AM
Mar 2014

Republican-controlled media shrieking about mom-jeans and Vlad's manly man-tits 24/7. Most people don't know enough about foreign policy to make solid judgments about what led up to crises and how we should react--so they only parrot what they hear in the media. I was about the only person in America who thought Bush's post-9/11 "bullhorn" moment was complete bullshit, a cheezy photo-op for a tragedy that he wasn't up to handling, the other 90% of America ate it up like a pudding.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
7. I don't, but I'm afraid thats whats coming as long as Putin is in control
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 12:05 PM
Mar 2014

He is NOT going to stop with Crimea. He will pressure other former Soviet countries. He's going to stand more firmly against us with regard to Iran. He's going to try to take the Arctic. He's already taken control over the Sea of Okotosk. At some point the world will HAVE to stand up to him stronger than sanctions.
I could be wrong, but so far I havent been when it comes to Putin.

Igel

(35,359 posts)
11. Did Putin want war?
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 05:32 PM
Mar 2014

I don't think so.

He put troops in Crimea--today the announcement was that they were pulling out "troops" in the 10s of thousands in the next few days. (Which is interesting, since they never put troops into the Crimea some would have many of us believe.)

By putting troops into Crimea he made it very high-stakes for Ukraininan troops to even just be there. To introduce more troops would have been insanely risky. This also made the vote less free, allowed the government to engage in repression (which many seemed to rather envy), and otherwise keep civil society under control.


Now the talk is of risk of having Luhansk, Donetsk, and nearby areas occupied by Russian troops. With a firm commitment from all of NATO to make sure that the same lack of opposition that met them in Crimea meets them in those areas; even the Ukrainians are less than firmly opposed, simply because *they* don't want war. Indeed, now Russia knows the kind of reception it'll get from the locals *and* from the non-locals. The side that is the least willing to stand up to a threat, even if it's a bluff, loses.

What would happen with beefed up troop presence in those areas? It would make it very high-stakes for Russian troops to be introduced there. Would it mean we want war with Russia, or whoever stations troops there is itching for a fight?

We have 30k US troops in S. Korea for the same reason. We used to have troops for that reason in Central Europe. Nobody says that we're itching for a war with N. Korea or wanted a war with the Warsaw Pact countries.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
4. I think that some people think that an American president has unlimited powers on the world stage.
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 11:45 AM
Mar 2014

That's just ignorant. Short of using force, no American president would have been able to stop Putin's incursion into Crimea. Obama doesn't have a magic wand, neither did the previous presidents.

Sanctions is the way to go and they are already being considered and implemented. They also can't be unilateral and need the full cooperation of the Europeans.



louis-t

(23,297 posts)
5. He gets "low marks" not because the public is so brilliant
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 11:59 AM
Mar 2014

but because the repugs scream all day, every day about how 'weak' and 'naïve' he is.

Dopers_Greed

(2,640 posts)
6. The RW media is out of control
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 12:00 PM
Mar 2014

It's pretty telling that a majority strongly back Obama's policy, yet his approval ratings still go down. No matter what he does, the RW media screams about it, and people listen.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
9. So what do they want
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 12:11 PM
Mar 2014

War with russia over their invision? Threating attack if puttin doesn't resign?

We aren't out of afghanstain yet and people want war with Russia?

I say we don't have any moral authority anymore to complain about Putin's actions after iraq and afghanstain.

 

arewenotdemo

(2,364 posts)
10. He deserves extremely low marks.
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 12:59 PM
Mar 2014

He had Nuland and Pyatt finesse a coup in a politically unstable Russian neighbor.

Only an absolute fool couldn't have forecast how Putin would react.

aceofblades

(73 posts)
13. If I am interpreting your statement correctly,
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 10:34 PM
Mar 2014

can you please explain how those two were either sufficient or even essential to said coup?

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
14. Don't bother.
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 10:50 PM
Mar 2014

It's an emoprog Benghazm. They tend to last about a month.

Wear earplugs is my recommendation.

JusticeForAll

(1,222 posts)
15. LOL this poll makes me laugh
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 10:57 PM
Mar 2014

Half the country couldn't even identify Russia on a map or even what continent it's on, let alone describe coherently the regional impact of the situation OR the president's response to it.

Like another poster said, they are just parroting the blowhards in the media and the Republican party without any cognizance of the actual situation.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Poll: Ukraine crisis hurt...