Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,060 posts)
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 05:14 PM Jun 2014

Federal appeals panel stops same-sex marriages (Indiana)

Source: Indianapolis Star

A federal appeals court issued an emergency order late Friday stopping same-sex weddings in Indiana pending the outcome of an appeal of a federal judge's ruling that the state's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional.

The order came just hours after Attorney General Greg Zoeller turned to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago to stop the marriages that have been conducted across the state since Wednesday.

The emergency order stops same-sex marriages but leaves many unanswered questions about the status of couples married prior to the stay.

Marion County Clerk Beth White, who took an early role in granting licenses and conducting civil ceremonies Wednesday, announced Friday after the stay that her office would stop doing so.

Read more: http://www.indystar.com/story/news/2014/06/27/state-turns-appeals-court-stay-halt-sex-marriages-indiana/11555205/?from=global&sessionKey=&autologin=



This court has 7 active Republican nominee judges and 3 Democratic nominees.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal appeals panel stops same-sex marriages (Indiana) (Original Post) alp227 Jun 2014 OP
That's fine. The SCOTUS will fix it. n/t napi21 Jun 2014 #1
The same Supreme Court... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2014 #13
You're right, but when this issue was before the court napi21 Jun 2014 #15
I hope you are right. nt awoke_in_2003 Jun 2014 #16
And years ago King Canute ordered the tide to stop coming in Botany Jun 2014 #2
".as a straight man I just don't get why anybody should beworried about "the gays" getting married." Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2014 #3
I know Botany Jun 2014 #6
I tell Right Wingers they should LOVE that EVERYBODY has rights... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2014 #7
Let me explain this, and many other things ton you Bickle Jun 2014 #11
I disagree. (With part of your post) Styx Jul 2014 #17
Well, USSC goes on vacation next week... malthaussen Jun 2014 #4
Funny, I thought Treant Jun 2014 #5
The stays were inevitable davidpdx Jun 2014 #10
The Holy and Pious crowd just can't stop, ever, thinking about... SoapBox Jun 2014 #8
Weirdos all right theHandpuppet Jun 2014 #9
I have never understood angrychair Jun 2014 #12
"Emergency order." Orsino Jun 2014 #14
 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
13. The same Supreme Court...
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 03:42 PM
Jun 2014

that found that the 35 foot buffer zone around abortion clinics was unconstitutional- I wouldn't hold too much hope on them doing the right thing.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
15. You're right, but when this issue was before the court
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 02:38 PM
Jun 2014

early this year I think, almost all the federal judges gleened that the majority of the scotus agreed this issue was unconstitutional. I doubt they are all wrong.

Botany

(70,589 posts)
2. And years ago King Canute ordered the tide to stop coming in
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 05:30 PM
Jun 2014


This act will no more stop "the gays" from being able to marry
as did King Canute's order to the ocean to stop coming in .....
Gay marriage will be the law of the land very soon.

BTW as a straight man I just don't get why anybody should be
worried about "the gays" getting married.
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
3. ".as a straight man I just don't get why anybody should beworried about "the gays" getting married."
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 05:40 PM
Jun 2014

There are people who honestly believe gay feelings are the product of SATAN.

.....and they struggle with those feeling every day....

Botany

(70,589 posts)
6. I know
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 06:37 PM
Jun 2014
When I hear a right winger going on and on about how bad it is to
be gay and then he goes into the mechanics of some sort of sex act or acts
I always think of, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

beworried botany =
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
7. I tell Right Wingers they should LOVE that EVERYBODY has rights...
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 08:34 PM
Jun 2014

The more people who have them, the harder it is for that "Big Government Monster" they fear to take them away.

Bickle

(109 posts)
11. Let me explain this, and many other things ton you
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 03:13 AM
Jun 2014

When someone doesn't like something or someone, they will never settle for changing the channel. Nothing short of launching it into the sun. If they care enough to say something, it needs to be wiped from the face of the earth.

So whenever you're asking this question, just full in " it exists, and I don't like it"

If we wiped religion from the face of the earth, far fewer people would have issues with this, as most of the roots of gay hatred are there, be they newer or more ancient ones.

 

Styx

(30 posts)
17. I disagree. (With part of your post)
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 01:07 AM
Jul 2014

The roots of homophobia aren't in the religion, they predate the religion. The book(s) have homophobic passages because there were homophobes back then, too, and they helped write the book(s), partially to justify and enshrine their prejudices.

malthaussen

(17,217 posts)
4. Well, USSC goes on vacation next week...
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 06:02 PM
Jun 2014

... so by the time they meander back in to work the appeals for the 7th and 10th circuits should be good to go. Any further appeals pending from other circuits?

-- Mal

Treant

(1,968 posts)
5. Funny, I thought
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 06:34 PM
Jun 2014

stays were only granted if the other party was going to be noticeably harmed if the court order went through. In this case, I fail to see the harm, other than butt-hurt, which doesn't count.

Ah, it would be nice if the law were the same for everybody, but we already know that's not true.

As of this particular moment, I have a one finger salute for the 7th, and all the other courts that have stayed these decisions (often after painfully short windows of opportunity for desperate couples).

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
10. The stays were inevitable
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 10:20 PM
Jun 2014

Granted I disagree with them and would like more than anyone to see them dropped. What is going to take is several appeals going to SCOTUS and a major decision that resolves all of the cases.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
8. The Holy and Pious crowd just can't stop, ever, thinking about...
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 08:57 PM
Jun 2014

what happens to women's privates (as in pregnancy, birth control and/or abortion) and don't even begin thinking what them homosexuals do!

Weirdos.

angrychair

(8,733 posts)
12. I have never understood
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:51 PM
Jun 2014

the legal rational for these type of stays from the court. What sort of legal cause does someone give for the court to order a stay on appeal? "I need a stay so I can appeal because "the gays" getting married will...." whatever the nutjob reason is supposed to be. Where is the proof of personal harm and cause that can be given to stop marriages? Is this something that automatic? Otherwise I don't understand the reasoning.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
14. "Emergency order."
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:32 PM
Jun 2014

Quickly, Mr. Justice! Dudes may be rubbing their wee-wees together, or something!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal appeals panel sto...