Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
Thu Jul 31, 2014, 02:37 PM Jul 2014

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 5 Male Justices Have A 'Blind Spot' On Women's Issues

Source: Huffington Post

Posted: 07/31/2014

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Thursday in an interview on Yahoo News that five men on the court have a "blind spot" when it comes to discrimination against women.

The five conservative justices last month ruled in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., that closely held for-profit corporations can refuse for religious reasons to cover contraception in their health insurance plans. Ginsburg, the two other women on the court and Justice Stephen Breyer dissented with the majority opinion, arguing that allowing some employers to choose what kinds of health coverage their women employees receive is a form of discrimination.

Asked by Katie Couric whether the five male justices fully understood the ramifications of their decision, Ginsburg replied, "I would have to say no."

"It's a little bit like the Pregnancy Discrimination Act -- not getting a simple point," Ginsburg said, referring to a 2009 decision in which the majority ruled that women cannot receive retirement credit for maternity leave taken before the law was passed in 1978. "But justices continue to think and can change."


Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/31/ginsburg-hobby-lobby_n_5636254.html



She's still a helluva lot more optimistic than I am, that's for sure.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
2. I'm not so sure I agree with Ginsburg on one point
Thu Jul 31, 2014, 03:00 PM
Jul 2014

She believes the 5 Neanderpiggies didn't really comprehend the ramifications of their decision. I think they did but just didn't give a damn. Of course, if you take another perspective on what Justice Ginsburg said, then she was politely inferring that they were too stupid to understand their own ruling. Now that I could buy.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
5. She explains here- Ruth Bader Ginsburg on breaking legal ground for women.
Thu Jul 31, 2014, 03:33 PM
Jul 2014
Ruth Bader Ginsburg on breaking legal ground for women, her first case before the Supreme Court, and her husband's support.

http://www.makers.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000046
 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
6. Oh it's not a blindspot, they just keep looking in the kitchen...
Thu Jul 31, 2014, 03:49 PM
Jul 2014

...and are constantly surprised (dismayed?) when they don't find the women there.

Gothmog

(145,627 posts)
8. Scalia has been going senile for some time now
Thu Jul 31, 2014, 05:54 PM
Jul 2014

The fact that Scalia has a blind spot should surprise no one

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
16. Well, there's DOMA, and marriage equality in general.
Fri Aug 1, 2014, 02:30 PM
Aug 2014

Kennedy is more accurately thought of as a swing vote than a moderate. He's a conservative but is somewhat less doctrinaire than his four colleagues. He will (in, admittedly, a minority of cases) disagree with them, and provide the crucial fifth vote that the four liberals need.

An obvious example is United States v. Windsor. By a 5-4 vote, Kennedy and the four liberals held that it was unconstitutional for the federal government to withhold benefits (Social Security, etc.) from same-sex couples who were legally married under state law.

That decision did not, by itself, establish marriage equality nationwide. It was, however, immediately beneficial to quite a few married same-sex couples around the country. Furthermore, the logic of the opinion (written by Kennedy) was not the narrow ground of federalism, holding that laws concerning marriage were traditionally the province of the states and that the federal government had to defer to each state's law. Instead, Kennedy based the decision on the Equal Protection Clause. That's why Scalia, in dissent, argued (correctly, as it turned out) that Kennedy's opinion "arms well every challenger to a state law restricting marriage to its traditional definition."

If Kennedy had stayed with the conservatives in Windsor, I doubt that we would have seen the wave of lower-court decisions that have brought marriage equality to many additional states.

dem in texas

(2,674 posts)
10. So many men equate birth control for women to viagra for men
Thu Jul 31, 2014, 07:42 PM
Jul 2014

they think women want birth control so they can go out and screw like crazy and not worry about getting pregnant. they have no idea of the toll pregnancy takes on a woman's body and health, not to mention how hard it is to raise a child. So sad that we have five supreme court justices that are so ignorant about women's health needs.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
15. there are women who think that way too.
Thu Jul 31, 2014, 11:47 PM
Jul 2014

Hateful religious or libertarian types--either way, (I've seen both), they're self-righteous and hateful conservafascists.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 5 Ma...