Beef processor files for bankruptcy over 'pink slime' uproar
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - Ground beef processor AFA Foods filed for bankruptcy protection on Monday and said it plans to sell some or all of its assets, citing the impact of media coverage related to a meat filler critics have dubbed "pink slime."
Meat processors have faced a backlash over the use of an ammonia-treated beef filler they call "finely textured beef." Food activists have campaigned to have it banned arguing the product was unappetizing, but supporters say the product is safe to eat.
AFA is one of the largest ground beef processors in the United States and produces more than 500 million pounds of ground beef products annually, the company said in documents filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware.
The company sells its retail products, which include frozen hamburgers, ready ground beef and beef skillet mix, under the brand names "Moran's" and "Miller Quality Meats."
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/02/us-afafoods-bankruptcy-idUSBRE8310HX20120402
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)As in the miller puts his quality oat bran, wheat hulls, and ground corn cobs into the product?
wordpix
(18,652 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)What do they put in deli turkey?
Robb
(39,665 posts)...Unreal.
randome
(34,845 posts)But a little business sense to make the product look more 'user friendly' could have alleviated much of this.
iemitsu
(3,888 posts)no amount of telling us it is safe to eat will change that.
sterilizing anything might make it "safe to eat" but it does not make it nutritious or a healthy choice.
randome
(34,845 posts)I don't even know if it IS nutritious or not. I just wanted to point out that many people were reacting to the term 'pink slime' -a media term- without bothering to learn anything else about it.
And the company might have at least colored it differently. Or mixed it differently. Or something.
But those are all moot points now.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)In his novel, The Jungle, Upton Sinclair too wrote of those "delicate sensibilities" so often trivialized.
"They use everything about the hog except the squeal." Chapter 3, pg. 38
Robb
(39,665 posts)Here's a question for you: how much ammonia do you think is present in untreated beef?
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)i could taste it in the mcdonalds double cheese burgers and couldnt stomach it. i wouldnt call that a case of "delicate sensibilities" it was digusting and i wouldnt buy it. the stuff is so suceptible to infection it has to be bathed in ammonia. ammonia is a poison why would i want to give it to my child? what scientific illiteracy
Robb
(39,665 posts)Ammonia gas, which is used under high pressure to alter the pH of meat to make it less likely for pathogens to survive, is not the same as ammonium hydroxide -- ammonia dissolved in water, the cleaning liquid you imagine is involved.
It is similar to refusing to eat sodium chloride because it contains the same "stuff" as Clorox.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)but youre correct in stating that regarding this process in am under-informed but i dont think your NaCl comparison is as accurate as the bleach analogy i stated. salt enhances flavor ammonia is a poison and leaves traces of itself in the food
bottom line (for me anyway)is i could taste it i used to eat alot of mcd's dbl cheeseburgers and it got to the point where i could no longer stomach them i told my wife there's something wrong with these and i can no longer eat them and gave them up. months later i found out they stopped using this stuff and now theyre delicious again.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,280 posts)Only a tiny trace of actual NH4+OH- is formed at equilibrium. (K~~10-10)
The instant ammonia gas contacts water -- as in wet beef -- it dissolves, so it is a quibble that the ammonia is added as a gas and not a solution.
The distinction between ammonia gas and aqueous ammonia solution (aka ammonium hydroxide) is not particularly relevant here. As soon as it contacts the beef it is aqueous ammonia. This could not be more different from the distinction between chloride and hypochlorite, which are in different oxidation states.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)... but the rich, adorable Englishman said we shouldn't eat it!!
katsy
(4,246 posts)As safe as pink slime may be, people have the right to not eat what they don't want to eat. End of story.
People have a right to know what is in their food and refuse to purchase any thing that grosses them out. They have the right to refuse to pay for a product even for NO reason at all. Customer's money. Customer's body. Their decision. Science plays no part in this. If science should play a part in this, give a good reason why I shouldn't eat grandma.
The jobs sacrificed are not the fault of customers who refuse an unappetizing product. It's the fault of the company management alone. Now that they've declared bankruptcy, they'll screw over their vendors and lenders paying out like 10 cents on the dollar of debt and voila! Everyone got screwed except the management team whose stupidity produced a product they thought customers would WANT to eat. They are at fault, no one else. Theirs is the kind of vision that would produce Broccoli O's cereal and think kids would be flooding the stores to buy them. I take that back... compare broccoli with cow lips and ass and broccoli would win hands down.
My guess is that scientifically literate people led the charge to take that crap out of our food chain. Just an opinion. I talk with friends, family and neighbors, all highly educated, and we share info about safe food, locally produced food, organic links etc. I wouldn't buy anything from an outfit like that for any reason and I don't even want to hear their bullshit. The farmer down the road I trust.
Travelman
(708 posts)DHMO. Dangerous stuff, that. Did you know that 2/3 of the makeup of DHMO is used in the construction of some nuclear weapons? Good Lord, what dangerous stuff that is!
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)Hilarious, but comparing the famous water hoax to people being upset over ammonia-treated beef waste is a false equivalency.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)How much ammonia do you think is present in untreated beef?
wordpix
(18,652 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,280 posts)Sell whatever shit you want as food, but don't tell anybody what's in it.
... and YET they went bankrupt ! Unreal.
Mosby
(16,334 posts)Just saying.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)Pastured, humanely-raised beef is a whole different subject.
http://www.naturalnews.com/035310_red_meat_grass-fed_beef_processed_food.html
I don't eat red meat myself, btw. But not because of healthiness reasons.
If BPI wouldn't have employed Kit Foshee for 10 years with his god damn delicate sensibilities and his concern for the public we would still be eating this delicious E.Coli ridden pink slime. Was he being too delicate for being concerned about BPI's process of throwing out just the box of product that failed their own PH test while sending out the rest of the boxes untested?
... people will eat the same amount of beef, just not THAT beef. There is no net job loss.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Calling Mitt Romney!!!
wordpix
(18,652 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Cook it up in the can with a little garlic, and there ya go. Pink slime is probably better than the road kill and not terribly fresh finely textured and processed horsemeat that is in the bargain dog food brands. And you don't have to worry about additives from China that will cause your dog to go into kidney failure.
And for people who say "Ewww, I wouldn't feed that to MY dog," and denigrate the concept totally, all I have to say is that it is wonderful to be wealthy enough to be able to afford the "Newman's Own" or Halo "organic" dog food, but poor people have pets, too, and any dog food that offers them nutrition, even if not optimal, is better than no dog food at all.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)robinlynne
(15,481 posts)Evasporque
(2,133 posts)Profit growth in food production means finding ways to make "more" profit off of less of the most expensive ingredients...
1. Additives....add cheap indigestible fillers.
2. Add air....air is free and you can say it is crunchy and new and improved.
3. Add HFCS and flavorings to reduce the amount of actual food and increase profit.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Ian David
(69,059 posts)Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)nadeltanz
(4 posts)My thoughts are so much "pink slime" was being put in the meat, that AFA became dependent on putting it in, i.e. the Company was putting more than the legal 15%. I wouldn't be surprised if it was discovered 50% or more of the "pink" stuff was added. Is it nomal to place ammonia in any food?
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)line cause business' never lie. what happens to the ammonia they put in the "food". it may not go into the final product , who knows, but it's in there and im sure it doesnt just disappear w/o a trace
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Travelman
(708 posts)Ammonia evaporates very quickly.
BTW, you do know that you have ammonia in your body right now, don't you? You know that your body makes ammonia?
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)your body also excretes the ammonia
"BTW, you do know that you have ammonia in your body right now, don't you? You know that your body makes ammonia?" yes but if i drank a bottle of ammonia it would likely kill me
Travelman
(708 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)appleannie1
(5,068 posts)I don't eat a lot of ground beef but if I do get it, I want fresh ground. The difference in taste and texture is amazing and I know how to shape my own hamburgers thankyou.
Amerigo Vespucci
(30,885 posts)I know Lucky's own ground beef has the slime. I wasn't sure about Moran's. Now I am.
mistertrickster
(7,062 posts)Quit whining, Cons.
mistertrickster
(7,062 posts)Don't eat anything that comes from an animal.
It's just not that hard . . .
eppur_se_muova
(36,280 posts)The problem, as always, is not that they did anything wrong, but that they got caught.
ETA: You can bet this bankruptcy is a way of dumping workers and eliminating debt. The management will be back in business with a "new" company making the same product within a year -- with lower starting wages than before. Bottom feeders are nothing if not adaptable.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Since the pink slime huzzah is fairly recent, is it not?
I think there is more to this story than meets the eye.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)Its been what, a couple months since this became a big story, and a month or so since companies started rejecting their product?
Blue Owl
(50,478 posts)n/t
benld74
(9,909 posts)As of December 2011, it posted annual revenue of $958 million.
AFA said it has $219 million in assets and $197 million in liabilities. AFA also said it has secured a commitment for $56 million in debtor-in-possession financing from its lenders GE Capital and Bank of America
They were running a day to day operation MADE possible by selling the slime. IF they ran their busines properly, they would still be in business.
ANOTHER case of GETTING TOO GREEDY. How greedy? 958 million evenue greedy.