Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,685 posts)
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 11:31 AM Sep 2014

New York: Bank didn't lend to blacks in Buffalo

Source: AP-EXCITE

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — A bank refused to offer mortgages to African-Americans living in Buffalo, New York's attorney general said in a lawsuit that he said was part of a wider investigation into an illegal practice known as redlining.

Evans Bank violated fair housing and discrimination laws by intentionally denying services and products to Buffalo's east side, home to more than 75 percent of the city's African-American population, the federal lawsuit alleges.

The bank's president, David Nasca, called the accusations "meritless." He said Evans, which has 13 branches in western New York, will vigorously defend itself.

"We remain confident that our residential lending practices meet all applicable laws and regulations," Nasca said in a statement emailed to The Associated Press.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20140902/us--bank-redlining_lawsuit-f2f1aea0ec.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York: Bank didn't lend to blacks in Buffalo (Original Post) Omaha Steve Sep 2014 OP
The plan WovenGems Sep 2014 #1
Same crap happened in the Twin Cities back in the Wellstone ruled Sep 2014 #2
In 1975, strong new reporting requirements became law for most lenders Gormy Cuss Sep 2014 #4
Mr. Nasca can take comfort that the proof lies in the bank's pudding indepat Sep 2014 #3
Except for state borders, isn't it unwise to define a "lending area" ? mwooldri Sep 2014 #5

WovenGems

(776 posts)
1. The plan
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 12:13 PM
Sep 2014

Violate the law then argue in court that anti-discrimination laws are discriminatory in that they don't allow personal bias.
Don't analyze this plan or you get a headache.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
2. Same crap happened in the Twin Cities back in the
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 12:45 PM
Sep 2014

1970's. Norwest Bank which latter was merged with Wells Fargo was charged with Red Lining which is basically the same thing. Slap on the wrist. BTW,same group did no-doc's to folks that had a pulse,and a line of BS,which as everyone found out,housing collapse. When you would see part-time College and,yes,High School Students pushing paper and doing UnderWriting,you just knew this was going to go bad. Just push the paper so their Team Lead would get their Bonus or Perks.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
4. In 1975, strong new reporting requirements became law for most lenders
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 02:11 PM
Sep 2014

and that put the brakes on redlining. The law is the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA.) The way it's written all large banks and lenders pretty much have to comply and provide data on the demographics of their lendees and applicants.

If Evans Bank has been redlining the HMDA data should be the start of a case against the bank. I'm guessing that it's big enough to be required to report (13 branches) but I don't know.

mwooldri

(10,303 posts)
5. Except for state borders, isn't it unwise to define a "lending area" ?
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 02:13 PM
Sep 2014

After all, even if it was defined in such a way to attempt to ensure that the area defined is non-discriminatory... somehow someone along the line will be unintentionally discriminated against - and unintentional discrimination is still unlawful.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New York: Bank didn't len...