Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,026 posts)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 10:02 AM Sep 2014

Senate Republican Leaders Introduce Bill That Would Permanently Hobble Federal Labor Law

Source: ThinkProgress

The National Labor Relations Board is a federal agency that has the exclusive power to enforce much of America’s labor law. If an employer tries to unlawfully intimidate workers against joining a union, or if it retaliates against pro-union workers, or if it refuses to bargain with its workers’ union, the NLRB is responsible for enforcing the law against that employer. Yet, if a bill introduced by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) — the top Republican on the Senate committee responsible for labor issues — were to become law, then the NLRB would likely become a stagnant, often frozen institution that could be unable to act in the face of flagrant violations of the law.

Although the NLRB’s members are not federal judges, the Board functions very much like a court. The Board has five members who release published opinions that are cited as precedents in future cases that come before the NLRB. When the members of the Board disagree, the view held by a majority of the Board’s members prevails, and the members in the minority may publish a dissenting opinion. Board members serve five year terms, and, when vacancies arise, new Board members are typically selected to maintain a 3-2 partisan divide with the party that controls the White House also controlling a majority of seats on the Board.

One advantage of this arrangement is that, when the NLRB is faced with an issue that divides its members along partisan lines, the three members in the majority can out-vote the two members in dissent, thus ensuring that the business of the Board continues. McConnell and Alexander’s bill would change this by adding an additional seat to the Board, which would be controlled by the opposition party. Thus, either party would be able to veto any action the Board wanted to take, because neither party would control a majority of the Board’s seats.

If this arrangement sounds familiar, that’s because it is. The Federal Election Commission is one of the most ineffective institutions within the federal government, largely because it is a six member agency with each party controlling three seats. Thus, the FEC’s Democrats can block any action that may aid Republicans, and its GOP members can do the same for actions that could benefit Democrats. As Trevor Potter, a former Republican member of the FEC explains, in recent years “most important votes at the FEC have resulted in partisan 3-to-3 ties, leaving the commission essentially unable to act.”

Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/09/19/3569362/senate-republican-leaders-introduce-bill-that-would-permanently-hobble-federal-labor-law/

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Republican Leaders Introduce Bill That Would Permanently Hobble Federal Labor Law (Original Post) Galraedia Sep 2014 OP
Ammo for Alison Lundergan Grimes. Half-Century Man Sep 2014 #1
Right. The way she fired away at McConnell with her ACA ammo? FlatStanley Sep 2014 #20
I am not part of her campaign. Half-Century Man Sep 2014 #22
I was merely pointing out her failure to use ammo in the past. FlatStanley Sep 2014 #25
Koch mtasselin Sep 2014 #2
Banana Republicans, at it again. marmar Sep 2014 #3
Workers, are you paying attention? nt ladjf Sep 2014 #4
And guess who signed this baby into law. ReRe Sep 2014 #5
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, of course. NCarolinawoman Sep 2014 #12
I thought everyone would know... ReRe Sep 2014 #15
I really wanted to watch this LittleGirl Sep 2014 #19
LittleGirl.. ReRe Sep 2014 #28
We couldn't elect an FDR today. FlatStanley Sep 2014 #21
right to work turbinetree Sep 2014 #6
Right to Work is a good thing? ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #9
O_o I think you mean unions and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Galraedia Sep 2014 #10
And pushed by Rand Paul. It'll either be him or Cruz leading the Senate, if not leader, as the whip. freshwest Sep 2014 #23
Really rotten. SammyWinstonJack Sep 2014 #7
The Republicans don't understand how good they have things now. surrealAmerican Sep 2014 #8
It would unleash the wolves on businesses IMO. LiberalFighter Sep 2014 #13
I can see the celebrations in all the red neck bars after work on Friday bragging about how great world wide wally Sep 2014 #11
, blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #14
And people vote these filthy freaks into office... SoapBox Sep 2014 #16
The difference here is that Republicans are anti-labor WhoIsNumberNone Sep 2014 #17
Republicans are against anything that will help the workers or the American people. sammy750 Sep 2014 #24
As if things are not bad enough for the working man. Enthusiast Sep 2014 #18
Republicans viciously hate working people randys1 Sep 2014 #26
Republicans don't like Americans Turbineguy Sep 2014 #27
Because labor is so powerful????? mountain grammy Sep 2014 #29
I wonder how many "democrats" awoke_in_2003 Sep 2014 #30
I thought the Republicans were against Court Packing K lib Sep 2014 #31
Modern Day Republicans = ancestors of slave owners, slave traders, and support staff Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #32
Bit confused on what you mean SnakeEyes Sep 2014 #34
The Democrats need to advertise this sort of crap that the GOP is trying to do. Major Hogwash Sep 2014 #33
UNREC brooklynite Sep 2014 #35
I have a new campaign slogan, pass it around. Give the Kochs a nightmare, Vote. Pass it along. Todays_Illusion Sep 2014 #36
I'd bet dollars to donuts they'll be able to find some like minded Dems to support their effort. nt NorthCarolina Sep 2014 #37

mtasselin

(666 posts)
2. Koch
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 10:11 AM
Sep 2014

This is being orchestrated by the Koch brothers, they have the money and the politicians in their back-pocket and are going to do there best to destroy the working people in this country. The unfortunate thing is that they will have the help of not only working people, but some democratic politicians. These libertarians or John Burch society people must be remove from power why we still have chance to save America.

NCarolinawoman

(2,825 posts)
12. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, of course.
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 11:34 AM
Sep 2014


With the groundwork being laid by Teddy R., as seen in post #6.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
15. I thought everyone would know...
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 11:41 AM
Sep 2014

... especially if they had been watching Ken Burns "The Roosevelt's" this week on PBS. (You can watch it online at http://pbs.org until the 28th of this month.)

LittleGirl

(8,287 posts)
19. I really wanted to watch this
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 12:53 PM
Sep 2014

but when I found out it was 14 hrs of it, no way, I don't have time for that. sheesh.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
28. LittleGirl..
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 11:13 PM
Sep 2014

You have a couple hours a day, don't you? You can watch it online until Aug 28th. I guarantee you, it is worth it. What happened back then is pertinent to most of what's happening right now in our country. Hope you reconsider.

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
6. right to work
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 10:41 AM
Sep 2014

This is the best institution set up under the Roosevelt Administration by Francis Perkins. And ever since then it has been under attack by conservative and blue dog democrats.
Teddy Roosevelt understood in his time that the working person needed protection from corrupt politicians and corporations and he began the progressive process.
Now and since the "Taft-Hartley" act has been in place the workers in this country have had a harder time to organize as "ONE" voice against the oligarchs it is time to repeal the right for less law.
It is now time to impeach/vote these two hypocrites and other republicans out of office, they are from the same states where one of the right to work for less colleges by the name of Corker injected himself in the VW union drive, which was against the law.
Republicans have no morals when it comes to rights for humans. They think a building with a name on it has more rights and the greenback.
Zephyr Teachout has it right in her new book and Doris Kearns had it right in her book the Bully Pulpit and David Kay Johnston, Elizabeth Warren have it right in there books

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
9. Right to Work is a good thing? ...
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 11:06 AM
Sep 2014

RtW was put of the attack on unions that seems surprisingly prescient, in that it predicted the cultural shift from common good to selfishness ... "I'm benefiting from collective bargaining, so I have an obligation to pay for it" to :I'm benefiting from collective bargaining; but, I feel no obligation to pay for it."

Galraedia

(5,026 posts)
10. O_o I think you mean unions and Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 11:18 AM
Sep 2014

Right-to-Serf is actually a right-wing law designed to hurt labor unions.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
23. And pushed by Rand Paul. It'll either be him or Cruz leading the Senate, if not leader, as the whip.
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 04:33 PM
Sep 2014

But honestly, how many Socialists would not vote for a Democrat to stop this happening in November?

I hope none, despite some rhetoric otherwise.

surrealAmerican

(11,362 posts)
8. The Republicans don't understand how good they have things now.
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 10:54 AM
Sep 2014

If they succeed in removing the worker protections that exist within the system, workers will have no choice but to work outside of the system to insure their own survival.

world wide wally

(21,744 posts)
11. I can see the celebrations in all the red neck bars after work on Friday bragging about how great
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 11:19 AM
Sep 2014

Republicans are. "That'll teach us!"

WhoIsNumberNone

(7,875 posts)
17. The difference here is that Republicans are anti-labor
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 12:42 PM
Sep 2014

so it wouldn't be equally ineffective for both parties like the FEC. Since the Republicans can be assumed to be against anyone who will bring a claim before the board, a tie would essentially be a win for the Republicans 99.9% of the time. (I would say 100, but you never know- at some time in the future there could be some unlikely set of unforeseeable circumstances where some labor issue will actually serve the Republicans purposes)

sammy750

(165 posts)
24. Republicans are against anything that will help the workers or the American people.
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 06:19 PM
Sep 2014

Republicans are anti people, against everything that promotes or help people.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
33. The Democrats need to advertise this sort of crap that the GOP is trying to do.
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 01:06 AM
Sep 2014

They need to make good ads that would run nationally, be seen across the entire country, exposing the Republicans for what they are -- pond scum.

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
35. UNREC
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 08:58 PM
Sep 2014

Yes, I appreciate that this is the actual headline, but it's uncalled for hyperbole. Absent a constitutional amendment, NO law passed by Congress is "permanent". The next Congress can always amend or replace it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate Republican Leaders...