Senate Republican Leaders Introduce Bill That Would Permanently Hobble Federal Labor Law
Source: ThinkProgress
The National Labor Relations Board is a federal agency that has the exclusive power to enforce much of Americas labor law. If an employer tries to unlawfully intimidate workers against joining a union, or if it retaliates against pro-union workers, or if it refuses to bargain with its workers union, the NLRB is responsible for enforcing the law against that employer. Yet, if a bill introduced by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) the top Republican on the Senate committee responsible for labor issues were to become law, then the NLRB would likely become a stagnant, often frozen institution that could be unable to act in the face of flagrant violations of the law.
Although the NLRBs members are not federal judges, the Board functions very much like a court. The Board has five members who release published opinions that are cited as precedents in future cases that come before the NLRB. When the members of the Board disagree, the view held by a majority of the Boards members prevails, and the members in the minority may publish a dissenting opinion. Board members serve five year terms, and, when vacancies arise, new Board members are typically selected to maintain a 3-2 partisan divide with the party that controls the White House also controlling a majority of seats on the Board.
One advantage of this arrangement is that, when the NLRB is faced with an issue that divides its members along partisan lines, the three members in the majority can out-vote the two members in dissent, thus ensuring that the business of the Board continues. McConnell and Alexanders bill would change this by adding an additional seat to the Board, which would be controlled by the opposition party. Thus, either party would be able to veto any action the Board wanted to take, because neither party would control a majority of the Boards seats.
If this arrangement sounds familiar, thats because it is. The Federal Election Commission is one of the most ineffective institutions within the federal government, largely because it is a six member agency with each party controlling three seats. Thus, the FECs Democrats can block any action that may aid Republicans, and its GOP members can do the same for actions that could benefit Democrats. As Trevor Potter, a former Republican member of the FEC explains, in recent years most important votes at the FEC have resulted in partisan 3-to-3 ties, leaving the commission essentially unable to act.
Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/09/19/3569362/senate-republican-leaders-introduce-bill-that-would-permanently-hobble-federal-labor-law/
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Fire away Ms Grimes.
FlatStanley
(327 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)It was merely a suggestion.
FlatStanley
(327 posts)mtasselin
(666 posts)This is being orchestrated by the Koch brothers, they have the money and the politicians in their back-pocket and are going to do there best to destroy the working people in this country. The unfortunate thing is that they will have the help of not only working people, but some democratic politicians. These libertarians or John Burch society people must be remove from power why we still have chance to save America.
marmar
(77,081 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)Anyone?
NCarolinawoman
(2,825 posts)With the groundwork being laid by Teddy R., as seen in post #6.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... especially if they had been watching Ken Burns "The Roosevelt's" this week on PBS. (You can watch it online at http://pbs.org until the 28th of this month.)
LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)but when I found out it was 14 hrs of it, no way, I don't have time for that. sheesh.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)You have a couple hours a day, don't you? You can watch it online until Aug 28th. I guarantee you, it is worth it. What happened back then is pertinent to most of what's happening right now in our country. Hope you reconsider.
FlatStanley
(327 posts)turbinetree
(24,703 posts)This is the best institution set up under the Roosevelt Administration by Francis Perkins. And ever since then it has been under attack by conservative and blue dog democrats.
Teddy Roosevelt understood in his time that the working person needed protection from corrupt politicians and corporations and he began the progressive process.
Now and since the "Taft-Hartley" act has been in place the workers in this country have had a harder time to organize as "ONE" voice against the oligarchs it is time to repeal the right for less law.
It is now time to impeach/vote these two hypocrites and other republicans out of office, they are from the same states where one of the right to work for less colleges by the name of Corker injected himself in the VW union drive, which was against the law.
Republicans have no morals when it comes to rights for humans. They think a building with a name on it has more rights and the greenback.
Zephyr Teachout has it right in her new book and Doris Kearns had it right in her book the Bully Pulpit and David Kay Johnston, Elizabeth Warren have it right in there books
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)RtW was put of the attack on unions that seems surprisingly prescient, in that it predicted the cultural shift from common good to selfishness ... "I'm benefiting from collective bargaining, so I have an obligation to pay for it" to :I'm benefiting from collective bargaining; but, I feel no obligation to pay for it."
Galraedia
(5,026 posts)Right-to-Serf is actually a right-wing law designed to hurt labor unions.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)But honestly, how many Socialists would not vote for a Democrat to stop this happening in November?
I hope none, despite some rhetoric otherwise.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)If they succeed in removing the worker protections that exist within the system, workers will have no choice but to work outside of the system to insure their own survival.
LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)They forget that there were labor unions before FDR.
world wide wally
(21,744 posts)Republicans are. "That'll teach us!"
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Go figure.
WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)so it wouldn't be equally ineffective for both parties like the FEC. Since the Republicans can be assumed to be against anyone who will bring a claim before the board, a tie would essentially be a win for the Republicans 99.9% of the time. (I would say 100, but you never know- at some time in the future there could be some unlikely set of unforeseeable circumstances where some labor issue will actually serve the Republicans purposes)
sammy750
(165 posts)Republicans are anti people, against everything that promotes or help people.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)Turbineguy
(37,343 posts)or anyone else for that matter.
It's against their religion.
mountain grammy
(26,624 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)will jump on board with this.
K lib
(153 posts)Or maybe they cant do math.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)SnakeEyes
(1,407 posts)They are people that came before slave owners/trade?
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)They need to make good ads that would run nationally, be seen across the entire country, exposing the Republicans for what they are -- pond scum.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)Yes, I appreciate that this is the actual headline, but it's uncalled for hyperbole. Absent a constitutional amendment, NO law passed by Congress is "permanent". The next Congress can always amend or replace it.