Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 12:08 AM Nov 2014

North Dakota Abortion Amendment Fails

Source: Propublica.org

"A month ago, North Dakota's Measure 1 looked like a winner. The proposal sought to enshrine "the inalienable right to life of every human being at any stage of development" in the state constitution. It was up 17 points in the polls.

But on November 4, Measure 1 was crushed, and with it the hopes of both the state's Catholic hierarchy and the national band of activists who make up what has become known as the personhood movement. A proposed Colorado amendment with similar aims also went down to defeat.

The takeaway? Despite the efforts of its firebrand supporters, personhood — the principle that an embryo is a human being from the moment of conception — remains an idea whose time may not yet have come, at least at the ballot box."

Read more: http://www.propublica.org/article/north-dakota-abortion-amendment-fails?google_editors_picks=true

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Dakota Abortion Amendment Fails (Original Post) LiberalElite Nov 2014 OP
This "personhood" -type bill failed in Colorado, too. Again. Archae Nov 2014 #1
good Liberal_in_LA Nov 2014 #23
The pro-fetus whackos lose again. roamer65 Nov 2014 #2
I really think if the abortion bills was put to the people to vote on them we would have Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #3
And if they would allow comprehensive sex ed leftieNanner Nov 2014 #6
Dontja know that providing for "those children" would lead to generations of welfare recepients? Hoppy Nov 2014 #15
worse than future welfare probably Democrats, now that would be a failure for the GOP. Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #18
Nice to have a little good news. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2014 #4
I suspect it was on the ballot to get the conservatives to turn out to vote. CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2014 #5
It's odd though... LAGC Nov 2014 #10
These antiabortion bills are going the way of the anti gay rights ads in recent past.. CTyankee Nov 2014 #25
Funny how more than 60% of voters rejected the personhood bill in CO mountain grammy Nov 2014 #7
You'd likely know better since you're there rpannier Nov 2014 #12
I'm so glad to hear this. SheilaT Nov 2014 #8
"I don't believe men should ever have a say in this conversation." nomorenomore08 Nov 2014 #11
Thank you. SheilaT Nov 2014 #13
I heard you! I especially agree with this statement: snappyturtle Nov 2014 #17
their obsession is truly weird. redruddyred Nov 2014 #28
These people don't want to control abortion PSPS Nov 2014 #9
THANK GOD, the ads for the amendment were disgusting. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #14
K&R n/t Feral Child Nov 2014 #16
Stick that up your big hats, RCC. Arugula Latte Nov 2014 #19
+1 BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #22
They don't need Amendments bucolic_frolic Nov 2014 #20
Whew shenmue Nov 2014 #21
pro-choice-legalization-higher wage states voting for republicans. redruddyred Nov 2014 #24
Join me shenmue Nov 2014 #26
I think it was on Rachel Maddow's show that we were Ilsa Nov 2014 #27
Too many people Aerows Nov 2014 #29

Archae

(46,337 posts)
1. This "personhood" -type bill failed in Colorado, too. Again.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 12:15 AM
Nov 2014

It failed even in Mississippi, for crying out loud!
But these fanatics who say they are "pro-life" will try anything, lie, cheat, anything, to get their way.

Just look how the most militant "pro-lifers" will destroy property, harass personnel, even commit murder.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. I really think if the abortion bills was put to the people to vote on them we would have
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 12:37 AM
Nov 2014

the same results. If these same groups was so anxious to provide for the children they want born as they are to prevent abortions I might listen to some, but they are only for forced births.

leftieNanner

(15,124 posts)
6. And if they would allow comprehensive sex ed
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 01:23 AM
Nov 2014

in schools and good access to affordable contraception, there wouldn't be such a need for those abortions. But noooooo! (Sorry, I just had a John Belushi flash there)

 

Hoppy

(3,595 posts)
15. Dontja know that providing for "those children" would lead to generations of welfare recepients?
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 08:25 AM
Nov 2014

They're not like you and me or their mothers wouldn't have gotten pregnant in the first place.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
5. I suspect it was on the ballot to get the conservatives to turn out to vote.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 01:13 AM
Nov 2014

You know, red meat for them, get them fired up.

And to that extent, it worked.

LAGC

(5,330 posts)
10. It's odd though...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 02:15 AM
Nov 2014

Even with so many GOP victories last night, many states passed measures boosting minimum wage and now this news about anti-choice measures going down in defeat.

It's like so many Republican voters don't even know what the party platform is, or are suffering from some serious cognitive dissonance.

Talk about a disconnect here...

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
25. These antiabortion bills are going the way of the anti gay rights ads in recent past..
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 04:14 PM
Nov 2014

I was wondering when this would happen.

I see now that this is the wave of the future. Folks have moved on and don't want the anti gay stuff and don't want to change the pro choice stance of their state.

We have seen the future and it is us....

mountain grammy

(26,624 posts)
7. Funny how more than 60% of voters rejected the personhood bill in CO
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 01:26 AM
Nov 2014

then elected Gardner who is still sponsoring such a bill in the US House of Representatives. They reject the message but not the messenger. Very strange.

rpannier

(24,330 posts)
12. You'd likely know better since you're there
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 02:45 AM
Nov 2014

But everything I read, said that Udall ran a really poor campaign. So much so that one of larger financial supporters publicly told him to stop talking about abortion and talk about other issues

I haven't seen anything good about the way his campaign was run

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
8. I'm so glad to hear this.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 01:26 AM
Nov 2014

I was an adult before Roe v Wade. I could tell you many stories of women with unwanted pregnancies, and what they did in desperation.

It enrages me that those who promote any sort of anti-choice measures clearly have no understanding of the realities of the situation. Even in the best of circumstances, birth control fails. But rarely is it the best of circumstances, and all too often women find themselves pregnant, when they didn't want to be. I don't believe men should ever have a say in this conversation . And as for the women that would deny choice, I say: If you don't believe in abortion then don't have one.

Period. End of discussion.

For all of us, as individuals, there are circumstances under which we'd go ahead and have the baby, given an honest choice. And other circumstances under which we wouldn't. No one ever has the right to judge anyone else's choice. My life is different from your. That is all any of us need to know. And in the end, we should all be treating each other with dignity and compassion.

This covers EVERYTHING. I am so sick of the wars between moms with jobs outside the home and moms without. The battles between those with children and those who don't have them. Listen up! We are all in this together. Our individual circumstances vary, but we should all be helping each other out insofar as we can.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
11. "I don't believe men should ever have a say in this conversation."
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 02:29 AM
Nov 2014

No they shouldn't. Except to support women's right to bodily autonomy - anything else essentially says that men ought to have dominion over women's bodies, and that is all kinds of fucked up.

"For all of us, as individuals, there are circumstances under which we'd go ahead and have the baby, given an honest choice. And other circumstances under which we wouldn't. No one ever has the right to judge anyone else's choice. My life is different from your. That is all any of us need to know. And in the end, we should all be treating each other with dignity and compassion."

Very well said.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
13. Thank you.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:42 AM
Nov 2014

Sometimes I feel as if what I say is unheard, but your acknowledgement shows me that it is not.

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
17. I heard you! I especially agree with this statement:
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:27 AM
Nov 2014
And as for the women that would deny choice, I say: If you don't believe in abortion then don't have one.


I've never heard of a case in the U.S. that forced a woman to have an abortion. I just don't get it. I wish these pro-lifers would put their efforts into something 'better'....e.g. feeding hungary children. Let's take care of the children we have.
 

redruddyred

(1,615 posts)
28. their obsession is truly weird.
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 05:31 PM
Nov 2014

esp when we consider the growing problems of poverty, climate change. opposing abortion isn't only misogynist, it's also mind-blowingly stupid.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
14. THANK GOD, the ads for the amendment were disgusting.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:25 AM
Nov 2014

Obviously paid actors who acted a RW stereotype of a "fallen woman" who had an abortion, regretted it, and found Jesus.

bucolic_frolic

(43,182 posts)
20. They don't need Amendments
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 02:02 PM
Nov 2014

Courts are already recognizing fetuses as people in cases involving
pregnant women and murder or car crashes.

It's their back door method.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
27. I think it was on Rachel Maddow's show that we were
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 04:23 PM
Nov 2014

Treated to the details of Colorado's birth control program for teens. They give the young women the option of using either the copper IUD or progestin so they don't have to worry about running out of oral contraceptives or payments every month for pills. It's cut their unwanted pregnancy rate for teens by 40%.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
29. Too many people
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 05:59 PM
Nov 2014

Republican, Democratic, Independent and in between know they wouldn't be here if their own mother was not allowed to terminate a pregnancy that would kill their mother before she had them.

I know I'm one.

An inviable pregnancy is an inviable pregnancy. One that would kill your mother, terminates all chances of her ever having a child again, because both she and the clump of cells they want to protect perish.

Easy way to promote abortion - deny health care to women so that they die while trying and failing to reproduce.

Oh, and then whine when women resist bearing a bunch of kids. I have to ask, are you serious when you ask such things?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»North Dakota Abortion Ame...