Rangel: Southern GOP Still Believes In Slavery, Wins US Senate Through Racism
Source: Mediaite.com & CNN
Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) doubled down on his belief that southern Republicans still believe in slavery and think the Confederates won the Civil War, implying that the Democrats major senatorial losses came as a result of institutional racism. Several southern Democrats lost their Senate seats Tuesday night to Republican challengers, leading Rangel to suggest that voter ID laws were really just racially-charged methods of suppressing the minority vote to their favor.
Im just saying that its unfortunate America doesnt deal with the problem of racism, Rangel continued. Until we fight hard to eradicate it, then we still have to be frustrated by people. They all come from the south and they all have these feelings about superiority and thats true whether youre picking cotton or youre president of the United States.
Blitzer noted that Rangel seemed to be doubling down on his previous remarks. Youre not walking away from them? As you know, they caused quite a stir, raising the specter of racism out there. I want to point out to you, an African-American Republican was elected, the United States Senator in South Carolina, Tim Scott. Rangels response: Were talking about a cancer that we have in the United States of America. America knows who they are. They know how they feel. And were talking about dealing with them. [...] Racial superiority, unfortunately, is a disease that a handful of people have. And they were holding back the Republican majority in the House of Representatives. Maybe now that Republican leadership doesnt need them, they can go along with people who want to improve the quality of life for all Americans and not those who just look like them.
Asked by Blitzer to name names, Rangel refused, instead saying the whole world knows who they are and certainly Americans do, and certainly [House] Speaker [John] Boehner does. I meant that they used to call themselves slave-holding states. Theyve been frustrated with the Emancipation Proclamation. They became Republicans, then tea party people. These are the people that are trying to frustrate people from voting, changing the voting rights that we fought so hard for. And all Im saying is, if you want to challenge the statistics, find out where the slave-holding states are, find out where the tea party is."
Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rangel-to-cnn-southern-gop-still-believes-in-slavery-wins-through-racism/
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I guess the 35 percent who didn't could be rasist. I don't know but 65 percent of the Republicans voting for him is pretty high.
big_dog
(4,144 posts)Sec. of State Kobach's New Rules Block 20 Percent Of Kansas Voter Registration Applications - See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/kobachs-new-rules-block-20-percent-kansas-voter-registration-applications#sthash.BX4npI1i.dpuf
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)big_dog
(4,144 posts)insulating them from racism, to further their aims, the decision in Ferguson may push this issue to the forefront very soon
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)They still voted for an African American.
big_dog
(4,144 posts)this is no different than Jim Crow, just with a nicer face
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)1) The only Republican on the ballot!
2) They get another useful "nigra" to show how non-racist they are.
3) Maybe it will help get more blacks to vote Republican (or so they futilely hope).
4) He's what they call a "house nigra".
Pardon the "nigra", but that's the way they talk down there!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)AnalystInParadise
(1,832 posts)Some people will use that racism dog whistle forever. I have just gotten used to the idea that for some anyone who disagrees with their voting preference is assuredly a racist. I tend to be more open minded about why people vote the way they do, but that is probably because I am somehow a racist also and I just don't know it.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)So true. Sometimes I just get so sick of it. I think I will just read it and go on with the next reply.
MADem
(135,425 posts)There used to be a lone Black GOP representative in Congress by the name of JC Watts. His father--his OWN FATHER--told him that a Black man voting for a Republican was like the chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.
JC had a smart daddy. JC should have listened to his Paw. The GOP didn't treat him very well, when all was said and done.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)knew that people like you and others here on DU will deny racism until you're blue in the face; and (2) because Uncle Toms like Scott will go along with everything they want him to do, including selling other blacks/Hispanics out.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)But the low information ones are probably shocked to even find out he WAS black.
They saw the R and pulled the lever because you know - those blacks are always taking something from them!
Just kidding - I know he's been there as an appointment - right? But still. The people that make up their mind the day of the election and only pay attention when they have to go and 'keep the minorities from taking things from them' were probably shocked to read the paper on Wednesday morning.
And for that alone - I'm glad he's a Republican!
radicalliberal
(907 posts). . . which is precisely what white bigots want him to do. He's just another Clarence Thomas -- another "Uncle Tom," a traitor to his race.
Edit: Scott is also a big fan of Strom Thurmond.
geretogo
(1,281 posts)and racism will be with us until the end of the Empire .
big_dog
(4,144 posts)some in the South can't even go that far, because it would derail what they are trying to do (supress votes)
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)refuse to admit racism? I can't wrap my head around it. It's so baffling. You see it right before your eyes. And many white people, regardless of party, see it. And yet, there are folk right here on a Democratic Party discussion board who just simply can't admit or accept it.
I don't understand that.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Lot of good it did them.
big_dog
(4,144 posts)when you stand up for your beliefs you win! (imagine that) Election results
LA, Senate - 100.00% reporting
Mary Landrieu 42.08%
Democrat 618,840
Bill Cassidy 40.96%
Republican 602,439
Rob Maness 13.76%
Republican 202,413
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Campaign. Can that be true?
madville
(7,412 posts)Considering that the republicans got 53% of the vote, it will be a tough runoff for her but turnout is pretty unpredictable at this point.
reddread
(6,896 posts)talks out of both sides of his loudmouth and does NOTHING to solve the problems.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)I took the bait. I'm glad you didn't.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)What Rangel believes is that the U.S. enters all sorts of military conflicts because many Americans, particularly wealthy, white Americans, have no direct connection with it. It's out of sight and out of mind. His gambit is that if we had an actual draft instead of an economic draft that we won't be so cavalier about sending troops off to risk their lives to fight for corporate interests.
Rangel's proposal is a tricky maneuver (and yes, it's a risky one), which is probably why some people obviously don't understand it.
Shemp Howard
(889 posts)Shemp Howard
(889 posts)Rangel is actually making a clever move when he calls for the draft to be reinstated. How many of the neocons would vote for war if they knew their children could be pulled from their cushy civilian jobs, and sent to the front lines?
As a side note, I believe Rangel is overstating the race angle. It exists certainly, but IMHO it is not the dominate force here. Progressives need to focus more on offering middle class solutions, as difficult as that might be.
BumRushDaShow
(129,096 posts)daring the chicken hawk neocon war hawks to put their money where their mouth is and shit or get off the pot. He knows that war is unpopular and a draft even more so, meaning the frivolous calls for engagements everywhere in the world on a whim, would cease.
He believes that if there was a military draft and everyone had to serve our leaders might thinking before waiting American blood and treasure. But it has nothing to do with what is being discussed here.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)As much as many hated the draft, it did basically give every american a stake in the US's foreign policy decisions. Now of course that the GOP has eliminated good union jobs the only option to get ahead for poor and working class people is to join the military and fight the wars for the rich.
alp227
(32,033 posts)Republicans have mastered the art of appealing to racists without looking explicitly racist. From Nixon's "law and order" dog whistle to Reagan speaking about "states' rights" in Philadelphia, MS (where the civil rights activists were murdered) to Rush Limbaugh's non stop demonization of Latino immigrants and black people to even worse crankery on WorldNetDaily...
wolfie001
(2,252 posts)alp227
(32,033 posts)wolfie001
(2,252 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)Paladin
(28,264 posts)There is nothing imaginary or trumped up about the pervasive presence of racism in the Southern GOP. The filthy comments and "jokes" I received by email about Obama in 2008 and 2012 weren't imaginary; I lost a number of friends over them. The plain fact is that a whole bunch of aging white people are furious about a black guy occupying the White House for two terms. They showed up at the mid-terms, and way too many Democrats stayed at home. And here we are.